sound-potters-pottery-hub-turn-form (1)

Shaping Souls: The Power and Purpose of Fidelity to God

Rediscover the profound significance of fidelity to God. This analysis illuminates its role in our lives, bridging the gap between ancient wisdom and modern realities.

Fidelity is a word that we seldom hear or speak of today. In fact, I think I have not heard that word spoken more than a few times in recent years. Perhaps this is because it is a quality or characteristic that we do not encounter very often—or often enough—in our day. It is, in fact, a quality of one’s character that defines and describes his or her devotion and allegiance to some person or principle. A few synonyms of fidelity include faithfulness, loyalty, constancy, integrity, reliability, and devotion. 

Let’s focus on just two of those synonyms—faithfulness and reliability. 

More than Belief

Fidelity to God includes or entails faithfulness to God. What does it mean to say that a woman is faithful to Deity? How do we describe a faithful man? What is it about a person of faith that stands out? Maybe it would be worthwhile, first of all, to discuss briefly what faith is not. 

Faith is not gullibility or falling for anything. Faithless people are sometimes quite critical of those who possess what they do not. They assume that people who live their lives by faith are naïve, easily swayed, simple-minded, and, in some cases, even dangerous. This is not faith. A faithful person is a thinking being, one who can judge, assess, discern, and reason, one who, for instance, can distinguish clearly between good and evil, light and darkness, right and wrong, important and unimportant. A faithful person does not fall prey to either the foolish or the perverse. Genuine faith can only be exercised in that which is true.

A faithful person is a thinking being.

Faith is not blind. In fact, those with faith are frequently able to see and discern things that a faithless person could never perceive. This is why it has often been said that believing is seeing, not the reverse. Nor are people of faith like blind sheep. There are millions of people throughout the world who exercise bold, intelligent obedience. Indeed, true faith is not blind, or deaf, or dumb.

Faith is not the power of positive thinking, nor does it consist in willing something into existence. Obviously, it’s a good thing to be positive, to be upward-looking, to be optimistic about now and the future. One only has to spend a short time with a naysaying pessimist in order to appreciate being with someone whose words are affirming, enriching, and edifying. But faith is not the power of positive thinking. Nor can one with a positive attitude simply will things into existence.  

True faith does not rise or fall with physical, tangible evidence; it cannot be held hostage by the presence or absence of the latest scientific or archaeological discoveries. In speaking of historical analysis, Professor Patrick Mason has written that “there is nothing more unstable than basing one’s life and outlook purely on the latest scholarship, let alone one’s casual perusal of it. What appears to be solid is actually quite transient.” In other words, “scholarship makes for a fairly wobbly foundation upon which to build one’s most profound commitments. I can’t imagine a more maddening life than to rise each morning to consult the learned journals to see what one’s position de jour is.”

I served for a time as the department chair of one of the most brilliant and informed persons I have ever known. Professor Hugh W. Nibley at Brigham Young University was a beloved twentieth defender of the faith. During those years, I came to know something, not only about his mind (which was amazing) but also a great deal about his soul, a man of deep and abiding faith. “[T]he words of the prophets,” he stated, some three-quarters of a century ago, “cannot be held to the tentative and defective tests that men have devised for them. Science, philosophy, and common sense all have a right to their day in court. But the last word does not lie with them. Every time men in their wisdom have come forth with the last word, other words have promptly followed. The last word is a testimony … that comes only by direct revelation. Our Father in Heaven speaks it, and if it were in perfect agreement with the science of today, it would surely be out of line with the science of tomorrow. Let us not, therefore, seek to hold God to the learned opinions of the moment when He speaks the language of eternity.” 

In my forty years of teaching university students, serving many years in a pastoral capacity, and as a result of poring over holy scripture, I have come to believe that those who have faith in God have come to trust God. How does one come to trust the Almighty? How, in fact, do we come to trust a fellow mortal? For example, what does it mean to say that I trust my wife, Shauna? Well, to begin with, I trust her in the sense that I know she loves me, that she knows me well enough to understand my heart, my deepest desires, and longings. I trust her in that she knows, only too well, my weaknesses and my inclination to be less than I should be, and yet she regularly displays the patience and long-suffering that is so often required on her part. I trust her because she is ever ready and willing to forgive me. I trust her in that I know I can share my heaviest burdens, my darkest moments, and my lingering doubts and that she will think no less of me. Finally, I trust Shauna because I know that ours is a winning team, that our companionship blesses and elevates my life and makes me so much more, so much better than I would be on my own. Further, I have confidence in her in that I know she will always come through. And Heaven only knows how much I rely on her wisdom and judgment, her discernment, and her unending devotion and loyalty. And so it is with our trust in God. 

Reliability: A Measure of Fidelity to God

So to have faith in God, we must come to trust Him, including His purposes for us, even more than our hopes and dreams for ourselves. One religious leader, Neal A. Maxwell, put it this way: “Too often we construe faith in the Lord to mean only the acceptance of His existence, an acknowledgment that He is there. What is wanted, since He is there, is our trust in Him, including His plans for us. Let us not complain of large classes in this mortal school when, at the same time, we consistently decline His offers to tutor us privately.” And, of course, linked closely with trusting His plans for us is trusting in His timetable, which is often different than our own.  

Fidelity to God entails reliability on my part. As I grow in faith, I come more and more to trust God, but I also become a person who can be trusted by Him, one who is reliable and dependable. That means that I will be at my duty station when I am called upon to serve and will be available when the call comes to do the difficult or be inconvenienced. If a thousand people of various Christian faiths were asked to choose which of the many qualities and characteristics that Jesus of Nazareth demonstrated stands out to them, I would suppose that the large majority of that congregation of Christ-followers would reply, His love. And if there is one correct answer to that query, it would seem to be how much He loved people.

Fidelity to God entails reliability on my part.

That love was manifested so very often in His willingness to be inconvenienced. Reflect for a moment on how many times we read in the New Testament Gospels of those occasions where Jesus is weary, in need of respite, or yearns to have time to be alone with God, His Father—but He chooses instead to love and lift and lighten the burdens of the hungry, the disenfranchised, the “sinners.” His followers are likewise called upon to be inconvenienced, to put aside their own agenda for a time, to step out of their comfort zones, to do what they have been charged to do rather than what they would prefer doing. God needs reliable boys and girls, women and men. He calls out for those who are reliable, who are people of fidelity.

Some seven hundred years before the coming of Jesus, Isaiah preached and prophesied of a day like our own: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes and prudent in their own sight!” In retrospect, I can look back on my past with deep appreciation, with fond gratitude for men and women of God who set a standard of goodness, an example of nobility toward God that seems more difficult to find in today’s world. That is, with my parents and loved ones, they taught me and showed me what God required of me and what He expected of me. They helped to form and shape my conscience and my spiritual sensibility, to be able to see things as they really are. 

Fidelity in a Changing World

Fidelity to God requires that those of us who love God—who treasure His word and are striving to live and abide by those words—stand up and speak out, let our voices be heard. Fidelity requires that we teach and testify of those absolute truths and absolute values that have made our nation great and good through the generations, but, sadly, truths and values that are steadily being pushed to the margins of an increasingly secular society. Our challenge, of course, is to assist those within our society as best we can, as lovingly but persuasively as we can, knowing full well that “if God be for us, who can be against us? Trusting in that sublime promise, we thereby position ourselves to hear, and hopefully for many others to hear, the quiet voice of the Lord whisper reassuringly and from time to time, “This is the way, walk ye in it.”

About the author

Robert L. Millet

Robert L. Millet is a Professor Emeritus and Former Dean of Religious Education at Brigham Young University.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Vivd Oil Color Painting of a Couple | Finding Sexual Harmony Within Relationships | What is Sexual Morality in Relationships?

Sexuality and Truth in Harmony

We are often told that great sex requires us to break boundaries and follow our passions wherever they lead. But what if great sex requires us to take account of the moral value of ourselves and others?

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 5, “The One Mighty and Strong”

Summary – Pyre is interrogating Sam, who shouts scripture at him about the “one mighty and strong.” Pyre uses false details about the murder to trick Sam into revealing that he isn’t the murderer. The police chief is getting ready to release the brothers, so Taba stalls him while Pyre talks to Robin about his brothers’ involvement in the “School of the Prophets” and gets him to reveal two names: Bernard Brady, a Provo businessman, and Prophet Onias. The detectives follow up with Bishop Low and his wife, located at the end of the last episode, asking them about the excommunication of Dan and Ron. The bishop is reluctant to reveal details because of clergy confidentiality but eventually reveals that Dan was excommunicated based on the testimony of his daughters that he attempted to forcibly take them as polygamous wives. We get a flashback to a heartbreaking scene where Matilda has sex with Dan to distract him as her daughters escape out a window in the middle of the night. Dan was excommunicated, and the girls were placed with a family in the ward (as the bishop refused to call CPS) but later ran away, and now they and their brother are missing. At his daughter’s baby blessing, Ron confronts the bishop about his brother’s excommunication, not knowing about Dan’s attempted polygamy and thinking that it’s about his political beliefs. Brenda has a conversation with Sister Low and Diana, indicating that both know that Ron is abusing her but only Brenda is willing to do anything about it. In fact, Sister Low feeds Diana a line about how her only duty is “creating a home and environment to sustain and support our Priesthood holder.” To Detective Pyre, the bishop claims to have followed church procedure but eventually encouraged Diana to leave and gave her money to do so. The detectives follow up on Robin’s lead about Bernard Brady by arriving at his house in the foothills of Provo with a warrant. We find out that the Bradys sheltered Ron when he was having a hard time. In a flashback, Ron receives a summons to a church disciplinary court and blames Diana for it. He punches her in the face and begins throwing the food she’s preparing on the floor, saying he’ll starve her into obedience. Diana grabs a kitchen knife and drives Ron from the house, telling him not to come back. Back in the present, Bernard admits to being in the School of the Prophets study group and driving miles to pick up Prophet Onias and the Laffertys but denies being further into the group than that. But when he sends his wife out of the room to make lemonade, he produces a notarized letter he sent to himself with details of the Laffertys’ hit list, including that Diana is on the list because she wrote a letter that got Ron excommunicated. The detectives rightly chastise him for not taking this information to the police earlier. Brady reveals that he knows the location of “the farm,” a Lafferty compound. With Allen’s help in drawing a map, the detectives plan to stake out the property in the morning. Detective Pyre returns home for FHE and finds that his wife and kids have been invited to the bishop’s house for the evening and are spending the night there. Pyre believes this is an attempt to keep an eye on his family and control the narrative about the case. The next morning on the way to the raid of the farm, Pyre questions Brady about the details of Ron’s excommunication, which we see in flashback. He is indeed excommunicated after lashing out at the church leaders about them not following the “correct” doctrines of the church. When Ron returns home, he finds that his teenage daughter has cut the markings out of his garments, which he puts on anyway with only a sports coat and jeans over the top. He says goodbye to his kids and leaves the home. When the farm is raided, the only people inside are three teenage girls, who we learn are from a polygamous compound in British Columbia and were brought down by Prophet Onias to be Ron’s wives. The girls show the detectives a cupboard they had been forbidden to touch, which the detectives open to reveal a single shirt belonging to Ron with some papers in the pocket, a hit list, and a revelation directed at Diana commanding her to repent and return to him. Allen is in disbelief that Ron could have written these things, but Brady confirms that Ron is a violent man. He explains that Ron fled to his parents’ home after his excommunication, where his mother confirms his calling as “the one mighty and strong” and says he’s only a heartbeat away from his rightful place. His father is lying sick in bed and asks Ron to call a doctor, but Ron recalls his cruelty to them as children and refuses. It’s implied that he indirectly caused his father’s death in order to take over the leadership of the family. Church History—This episode contains the most fabricated piece of church history in the show. When Bernard Brady reveals that Diana’s information led to Ron’s excommunication, he makes an analogy to Joseph Smith’s martyrdom. He claims that while Joseph was in hiding after destroying the press of the Nauvoo Expositor, Emma wrote a letter to Joseph encouraging him. John Taylor intercepts this letter and adds a line meant to make Joseph turn himself in, thus indirectly causing the prophet’s death. Taylor’s motive is to put Brigham Young at the head of the church, instead of Emma’s young son, in order to continue the doctrine of polygamy, which he and Brigham are already heavily involved in. Reputable historians both in and out of the church say there is no evidence to support this interpretation of events, though the succession crisis between Brigham Young and the ten-year-old Joseph Smith III is real and