A Woman Looking Scared With Cameras In a Home | Public Square Magazine | Secret Lives of Mormon Wives by Hulu

How Hulu Exploits Latter-day Saint Women to Make Cheap Drama

Does Hulu's 'Secret Lives' challenge patriarchy or mock faith? It sensationalizes shallow performances and cheap drama.

I’ll admit it—I watched Secret Lives of Mormon Wives. What drew me in was a concern: I anticipated an indictment of the faith I love. Hulu seems to have a growing obsession with portraying religious communities in an inaccurate and negative light. While the cheap drone shots of temples every few minutes signaled that familiar intent, what struck me wasn’t an indictment of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints—it was a testament to what feels more like Hulu’s tabloid exploitation of young women.

These women, most of whom are in their twenties and navigating the complexities of marriage, motherhood, faith, and unrealistic societal expectations, are the ones on display. They are caught in a world where they’re expected to do it all—be perfect wives, mothers, and individuals in a society that celebrates instant gratification and social validation. I couldn’t help but be reminded of the tired old trope from the 1980s: “Bring home the bacon, fry it up in a pan, and never let you forget you’re a man.” But that expectation has evolved into something even more exhausting, where perfection is expected in every post.

This portrayal doesn’t reflect the broader membership.

As I watched, I found myself endeared to many of the cast members. They are charming women, with aspects of their personalities that are engaging and relatable. In some ways, they are seemingly doing their best to navigate a difficult path. However, I couldn’t shake the feeling that they were being exploited by the very platform that claimed to tell their stories. Hulu has capitalized on their vulnerabilities, creating a narrative that reinforces stereotypes and perpetuates a shallow, sensationalized version of Mormonism. The result is not an honest exploration of faith, as the title would imply—it is nothing but a spectacle.

Hulu has used these women to create another notch in their collection of anything but “secret” dramas. But what did we expect?

Modern Mormonism: An Indictment of “Progressive” Faith?

Hulu claims to showcase members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but it fails to accurately represent the way the vast majority of members live their faith. Secret Lives of Mormon Wives focuses on a subset of Mormonism, with the cast identifying themselves as “progressive” or “modern Mormons.” They are part of our family of faith, but this portrayal doesn’t reflect the broader membership.

Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints strive to live their faith with deep conviction, fully committing to principles that guide every aspect of life. The gospel of Jesus Christ calls for complete devotion—it is not a casual religion. The Lord invites us to fully embrace His teachings and experience the blessings that come as a result— “Prove me now herewith,” He invites. In contrast, Secret Lives of Mormon Wives presents a version of faith that seems more concerned with image, social validation, and conforming to modern cultural trends. 

Could it be that what we’re seeing isn’t a flaw in the faith itself but a reflection of the challenges that arise when faith is practiced more superficially or without grounding in its deeper doctrines? Could the instability we see in the show stem more from practicing faith as a mere tradition or an afterthought rather than the faith itself? These are questions worth considering. The series also raises issues about the culture of Instagram, TikTok, selfies, and performative spirituality

The tragedy lies in the cycle of exhibitionism and external validation, where individuals become trapped in social media’s endless demand for more attention, more likes, and more drama. Hulu has perpetuated this cycle, exploiting these young women and reinforcing a shallow version of faith that leaves both them—and those watching—feeling empty.

Challenging Gender Roles? Or Missing the Wisdom of Layered Care?

One of the dominant narratives in this series is the idea of challenging the so-called patriarchy and traditional gender roles. The cast members often express frustration with what they perceive as outdated expectations placed on them by their faith. But who is truly applying the pressure and shaping the narrative? 

It’s worth asking: Could there be wisdom in traditional structures that the show is overlooking, especially when it comes to providing stability and the best outcomes for children? Family is not a one-size-fits-all proposition, and the beauty of traditional family systems is in their adaptability through different seasons of life.

There are layers of care and support that evolve as individuals and families grow. A mother with young children may focus on nurturing and providing emotional stability during those early, formative years. But that role shifts and expands as her children grow older, as her family’s needs change, and as she herself evolves. There’s wisdom in this design—each season of life provides an opportunity for both men and women to contribute in complementary and meaningful ways that go beyond the rigid definitions often caricatured in the media.

Social science backs up what religious teachings have long said: children thrive best in environments where they are surrounded by love, stability, and consistent care from both parents. Many women, in turn, find deep fulfillment not only in nurturing relationships within the family but also in using their unique talents and skills in ways that benefit both the family and society.

Traditional family structures, when viewed through this lens, are far from being rigid or oppressive. Instead, they provide layered care and a framework for flourishing support where men and women can contribute to the needs of the family. In contrast, this series presented a chaotic alternative.

When families break down, so does the fabric of civilization itself.

While the cast members do an admirable job explaining aspects of the Latter-day Saint faith that are often mocked—such as garments, the Word of Wisdom, and the role of family and priesthood—the show itself is a disservice to the deeper values these teachings represent. If anything, it makes a mockery of these values, reducing them to punchlines in a poorly executed drama.

The closest thing to a coherent theme in Secret Lives of Mormon Wives is the idea of “challenging the patriarchy.” This aligns neatly with the current cultural moment, where traditional family roles and structures are often seen as oppressive rather than protective. The show attempts to highlight the supposed failings of these women’s religious and family lives, but what it unintentionally proves is the importance of family structure and faith for mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being. We know, through both religious teachings and social science, that stable families are the foundation of thriving individuals and societies. When families break down, so does the fabric of civilization itself. Hulu, in its bid to stand out, has missed an opportunity.

A Missed Opportunity

In the end, what if Secret Lives of Mormon Wives had taken a different path? Could it have been something truly revolutionary by exploring the richness of faith and family in a more thoughtful way? If producers really want to be unique, they could try exploring the depth of commitment that brings real joy and the value of family structures that help humans thrive. Instead, Hulu chose the easy path—the tabloid drama, the sensationalist spectacle, the shallow, performative spirituality that dominates social media today. Nothing new to see here.

The show is more an indictment of the self-proclaimed “progressive” version of faith it seeks to promote. It showcases a “common wrecker” version that lacks substance, depth, and the transformative power of “a builder that works with care.” The Lord has promised, for those who are “all in“—those who are willing to “prove me now herewith”—peace, stability, and joy. The show proves that treating faith as a cultural accessory results in chaos, discontentment, and fractured relationships.

Hey Hulu, want to stand out, to be unique? Here’s a thought: promote what really works. Show what happens when humanity commits to ideals that bring out the best in each other, principles that are designed to last, not trends that fade with the next viral post.

About the author

Carol Rice

Carol Rice serves as the Director of Communications for Public Square Magazine, a collaborative project of the Elizabeth McCune Foundation. She holds a Master of Arts in Professional Communications and a Bachelor of Arts in Marriage and Family Relations with an emphasis in family advocacy. Carol's work focuses on advancing public discourse around family dynamics, communication, and social issues. She and her husband are parents to five children and reside in Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven: Episode 4, “Church and State”

Summary — The episode begins with the detectives checking in on Bishop Low’s home, which they find ransacked and deserted. Pyre finds a letter written by Ron’s wife to the Prophet expressing concern about her husband’s refusal to pay taxes. The detective contacts the Church about the letter and is told the letter was handed down to one of the bishop’s counselors, LeConte Bascom, who works at the bank. Brother Bascom says he had to turn Ron down for a loan because his brother’s refusal to pay taxes made him a liability, though it’s heavily implied that the real reason is that his wife’s letter was seen as an embarrassment to the Church. In flashbacks, we see Dan marching in a Pioneer Day parade, shouting about the government’s illegal taxes, as well as smoking and kissing a woman who isn’t his wife. Dan’s father says he’s ashamed of his immoral behavior and anti-tax nonsense and advises him to study the scriptures to set himself back on the right path. This unfortunately drives Dan into researching more obscure history of the Church, including information on polygamy.  He makes a business trip down to Colorado City to visit the breakaway polygamist sect there and manages to get the name of a pro-polygamy pamphlet called “The Peace Maker.” He reads this pamphlet and brings up the idea to his wife Matilda, telling her she’s limiting his spiritual power if she doesn’t let him marry a second wife.  During this conversation, Dan is pulled over for speeding and refuses to cooperate with the officer, leading them on a police chase that ends with his arrest. At the jail, Dan’s brothers try to convince him to stop his resistance to the government. Ron feels it’s his responsibility to show Dan the error of his ways, but instead, Dan runs circles around him, leaving him speechless and admitting that he’s going to lose his business and home. Dan somehow turns this fact into evidence that his views are correct and ends up winning over Ron to his side. In the present, Detective Pyre is being leaned on by the Laffertys’ stake president to release them into his custody but refuses. The detectives have identified the car the killers were probably using and plan to hold a press conference to ask for tips when the police chief returns from vacation and demands that all mentions of fundamentalism Mormonism be scrubbed from the press briefing. (It’s implied he’s being leaned on by the Church.) Pyre tries to toe the line at the conference but eventually caves to a persistent reporter and admits that he thinks that the murders may have something to do with fundamentalist beliefs. The next day at church, the ward is shunning the Pyres, and a specific couple is assigned to keep an eye on their faith. Meanwhile, a police officer has located Bishop Low fly fishing in the mountains and safe. Church History — During Dan’s explanation of polygamy, we get flashbacks to the infamous scene where Emma finds out about the doctrine of polygamy for the first time and throws the revelation in the fire. Though church members will be familiar with this story, the tone is portrayed very differently than we are used to. Emma is shown as being absolutely skeptical of Joseph’s translation of the Book of Mormon and other prophetic acts, even though she firmly testified of the truth of these things even after her break with the Church after Joseph was murdered. Joseph is portrayed as proclaiming the doctrine of polygamy only for his own physical gratification, which is a common anti-Mormon trope with little evidence behind it. While it is true that one of Joseph’s wives was only 14, the facts behind the situation are more complex than portrayed in the show. The pamphlet “The Peace Maker” is portrayed by Dan Lafferty as an “essential LDS tract” written by Joseph Smith, and no one in the show ever corrects this perception. In fact, the tract was not written by Joseph Smith, and he repudiated it during his lifetime. This episode presents a slanted view of church history, giving only one side of the conversation and showing the modern church as trying to hush it up rather than having its own interpretation of events. Shibboleths — Pyre claims that writing a letter to the prophet is like writing to “Heavenly Father himself,” which is absolutely wrong. While members of the Church do revere the prophet and listen to his teachings, he is not God, and this equivalency is not one Saints would make (though outsiders think we do). The idea that doing business with fundamentalists is like “doing business with the mafia” is totally alien to me. They are regarded as somewhat of an oddity in Utah, but not dangerous like organized crime. One unusual phrase occurs when the stake president claims that the Laffertys need to be released into his custody for “healing prayer.” I honestly have no idea what this phrase refers to and have never heard it in an LDS context. And the formal type of shunning portrayed happening to the Pyres is not something we do. Though obviously, wards vary in their culture, there is no formal instruction not to talk to those who have questions. Rather, we are encouraged to keep being friends with those who are struggling with faith and support them however we can. Changing History — It is interesting to note that in the actual chain of events, it was Sister Low, not Bishop Low, who was on the Lafferty hit list. Sister Low was a Relief Society President who supported Dan’s wife as she sought a divorce. Why does the show change this? Perhaps the idea that the Church has female leaders doesn’t fit well with the show’s depiction of the oppression of women in the LDS church. Brenda Lafferty’s sister has also expressed her disappointment with the way the show is misconstruing her sister’s murder in pursuit of an

Trying to Christmas Like Jesus

It’s hard for most of us to resist the sheer momentum of America’s consumerist Christmas. But once you’ve witnessed precious families just barely surviving—like Joseph and Mary of old—it’s impossible to celebrate Christmas the same way.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!