A cardinal casts a ballot alone by candlelight, illustrating the solemnity and spiritual gravity of the papal election and the depth of conclave meaning.

A Church in Waiting: A Conclave of Possibility

Who will lead the Catholic Church next? The conclave may reshape its global, theological, and moral influence.

Download Print-Friendly Version

On April 21, 2025, Pope Francis, 266th Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church, passed away. At that time, the Catholic Church entered a sede vacante period, which is Latin for “the chair is vacant.” On May 7, 2025, the College of Cardinals, 135 of which are eligible to vote but only 133 will participate, will convene in the Sistine Chapel to elect a successor to Pope Francis. Who will it be? What could this mean for the future of the Catholic Church and other Christians? This article will attempt to answer these questions.

How The Conclave Works

If you’ve seen the movie Conclave, you already have a somewhat accurate picture of how a papal election works. The College of Cardinals—comprised of Catholic leaders from around the world—gathers to elect the man they believe is best suited to lead the Church’s 1.4 billion members.

Technically, any baptized male is eligible, but the pope is almost always chosen from among the cardinals. To be elected, a candidate must receive a two-thirds majority—about 90 votes, depending on attendance. The voting will begin on May 7 and continue until a new pontiff is chosen. Once elected, the pope must accept the role and choose a regnal name—the name by which he will be known throughout his pontificate. Afterward, the ballots are burned. If a pope has been elected, white smoke will rise from the Sistine Chapel chimney, signaling to the world that a new leader has been chosen. He will then appear before the public in St. Peter’s Square.

Since the Second Vatican Council concluded … no one is sure exactly where the Church is headed.

While there have been many speculations about who is likely to be elected, since Pope Francis selected the vast majority of cardinals in this conclave, many have not had time to get to know one another or discuss which direction they think the church should take. The past several conclaves have lasted less than a week, but as this is a very different make-up of cardinals who scarcely know each other, it may take longer. As of 2025, the longest conclave was three years, lasting from November 1268 to September 1, 1271, when Pope Clement IV was elected.

Why the Conclave Matters

Whether you are a Catholic or not, the outcome of this conclave is of vital importance. Ever since the Second Vatican Council concluded in 1965, where the church issued proclamations on revelation, liturgy, religious liberty, ecumenism, and even the church itself, the state of the Catholic Church has been one where no one is sure exactly where the Church is headed. This is in large part because there is no universal consensus on how to interpret that council. Some see it as not a radical break with the past, but merely some updating and non-fundamental change. This is known as the hermeneutic of continuity, which Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI championed. Others see the Second Vatican Council as a rupture with the Catholic tradition and long for a return to the church as it was in the past. This position is most associated with Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s Society of Pius X and Catholics who refer to themselves as Traditionalists. Others see Vatican II as progress and want to see more reform and a greater break with the past. Pope Francis and his supporters generally fall into this camp. Which camp will prevail is unknown, and thus the future of the Catholic Church is unknown. The next pope will play a significant role in determining where the Catholic Church is headed, for better or worse.

But if you are not a Catholic, this upcoming conclave is still of value to you, especially if you are a Christian. This is because the Second Vatican Council emphasized ecumenism, and the three different camps hold different opinions on the topic. For example, Traditionalist Catholics often reject it, believing that unity can only be achieved through conversion to Catholicism. Others, like Pope John Paul II and Pope Francis, champion interfaith outreach.

Who it will be, and what his leadership will mean, remains to be seen.

Notably, in 2019, Pope Francis met with President Russell M. Nelson of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints—a first in papal history—when President Nelson visited Rome to dedicate an LDS temple. If ecumenical dialogue is important to you, this conclave may be one of the most consequential elections in recent Catholic history.

The pope’s influence also extends beyond religion. As the sovereign of Vatican City and a representative at the United Nations, the pope has diplomatic and moral influence across political and humanitarian spheres as a member state.

By next week, the Catholic Church will likely have a new pope—and potentially a new trajectory. Who it will be, and what his leadership will mean, remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the days ahead will not be dull.

As a convert to Catholicism and a committed Traditionalist, I don’t claim to be an impartial observer. But no matter the outcome, I intend to follow the counsel of Pope Boniface VIII in his papal bull Unam Sanctam: to submit to the authority of the newly elected pontiff.

About the author

Tarik D. LaCour

Tarik D. LaCour is a Ph.D student in philosophy and a Master’s student in evolutionary biology at the University of Texas at Austin. When he not brooding on human nature, the nature of time, and evolutionary theory he also enjoys spending time with his wife and two daughters, as well as obsessing over the Texas Longhorns, Dallas Cowboys, Los Angeles Lakers, and New York Yankees. He blogs personally at Boltzmann Brains on Substack.
On Key

You Might Also Like

“Madame Web” is a Good Film for Young Teens

Sony’s series of Spider-man adjacent films have mostly focused on anti-heroes. Since Spider-man, the hero, is by corporate necessity absent from these films they need to turn less than heroic characters into the protagonist.  This doesn’t make those films bad, but it does make them more complicated, and not often the best fit for the teenaged kids that could otherwise most benefit from the superhero narrative of good vs. evil. In that respect, Madame Web is a welcome reprieve. This is an unabashed superhero origin story. And in many respects, it demonstrates the durability of the genre.  Madame Webb owes much of its success to the animated Spider-verse films. Those films introduced audiences widely to the idea of multiple spider people, and in a recurring motif from the first film the basic beats that define those various spider people, and the near infinite variations those beats can take. Madame Webb hits each of those beats while toying with the formula enough to keep it interesting.  The moral at the center of the film focuses on our ability to influence our futures. After a traumatic incident, Cassie discovers that she has precognition. At first she feels helpless to stop the future predicted in the visions. But when three innocent girls are about to be murdered by the villainous Ezekiel Sims she can’t stand by and is thrust into the role of protector. As the film reaches its climax, both Cassie and the three teenagers she protects learn to step up. And the film seems best suited to teens about their age and a little younger thirteen to sixteen. Dakota Johnson has the acting chops to anchor the film. She ably handles the expositional relationship building, the determined character develop, and the thriller action scenes. Sydney Sweeney, Isabel Merced, and Celeste O’Connor, who play the three teenagers each portray a character who will one day become Spider-woman in the comics. They never try to do too much, and always deliver when the film requires it. Adam Scott is also a standout as “Ben Parker” who spends much of the film excited to become an uncle.  The villain, Sims is far and away the film’s weak point. His motivation is confusing. And it appeared at several points as though his dialogue was dubbed. But his simplicity as a villain helped along the film’s theme. There was little question about what the right thing for our protagonists to do was, only whether or not they would do it.  The film utilizes its range of PG-13 profanity, and the violence is just enough that I probably wouldn’t want my own kids to see the movie until they were teens. In terms of messages about family the film really shines. The film begins with a flashback to Cassie Webb’s mother nine months pregnant and upset about how her child is getting in the way of her work. But much of Cassie’s growth as a character comes from dealing with the damage of that attitude, and learning to embrace her own nourishing side. Each of the three girls are dealing with similar struggles. And Cassie learns the full strength of her powers as she also learns the full truth about her roots.  I certainly don’t want to overpromise on the film. It’s effects are clunky, and the plot is predictable. But it’s a movie you can let young teeangers watch without having to worry about explaining too much afterward, and that they will dependably get a good takeaway from. And if the parents happen to catch it too, they  will at least have a fun time. Two and a half out of five stars.  “Madame Web” releases in theaters on February 16th.

Deciding Who to Trust

The question of trust is front and center in crises in America today. Some declare a need to “trust more”—while others insist on less and a need for more scrutiny and critique. What if they are both right?

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This