New Yorker’s Odd Swipe at the Church

The New Yorker published a story last week about the authorship and provenance of the 1971 book Go Ask Alice. The book is presented as the diary of a teenage girl, but a new book suggests that it was composed by Beatrice Sparks, a woman who claimed to only have found the diary and edited it.

The article is a fine read, asking interesting questions about the ethics of publication, and the difficulties of identifying authorship.

But near the end of the article they include this line, “As a few ex-Mormons have pointed out, Sparks was not the first Mormon to publish a text ostensibly based on an original source that the rest of the world did not get to see.”

The line takes a not-quite veiled swipe at the founding of the religion that Sparks was a member of.

I can’t help but wonder if Sparks was a Catholic, would the author have been as comfortable opining, “Sparks is not the first Catholic to put out a book where the original sources aren’t available.”

This kind of winking attack feels more fitting on the ex-Mormon Reddit than in a major publication like the New Yorker.

On Key

You Might Also Like

Louis Moeller 'Different Opinions' | How CRT & Classical Liberalism Collide | Public Square Magazine | Critique of Liberalism Critical Race Theory | Who is the Father of Classical Liberalism

How CRT and Classical Liberalism Collide

Most people seem not to appreciate how deeply some of the popular ideas advanced by advocates of Critical Race Theory conflict with the foundations of liberal democracy. More, not less, attention needs to be given to this disconnect.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!