us-immigrants-1900jpg-62a0960c644a8081 (1)

The Charity Most of Us Lack

Are all refugees welcome, or only the ones who look like us?
Immigrants arriving at Ellis Island, New York from Russia.

There are a couple of phrases in the Bible nearly all Christians (including Latter-day Saints) pass over without understanding or internalizing.

The first is found in the Old Testament. Leading up to the Babylonian captivity, the Lord Jehovah was desperately trying to get the Jews to repent. He was kind enough to give them a list of transgressions and sins that needed to be corrected in order for them to avoid disaster. This list included the following:

Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth! (emphasis mine).

Pretty obscure, right? What it means is woe to them who crowd out the poor from their neighborhoods and lands. As you nod your head and agree with the lack of charity manifested when that happens, take a moment to imagine yourself at a town meeting where low-income, high-density housing is being proposed for your own neighborhood. Are you yay or nay? If you are nay, you surely have some sensible reasons, but I would argue none of those reasons qualify you as a person having the kind of charity God requires of His disciples.

Here’s the other scripture:

Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, … Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil (emphasis mine).

What does that even mean—”seeketh not her own”? It could be a warning about coveting your own property and focusing too much on your own needs and desires, which is perhaps how most of us interpret it.  But it might be better interpreted to mean sticking to your own circle of friends without reaching out to others in charity. Christ once taught, “For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?”

Our Concern for Ukraine

My grandfather, with his siblings and parents, left Ukraine for the United States in 1914. They were Jews who lived in Kamenka, a Jewish shtetl (village) that was essentially a suburb of Kyiv. By fleeing at that time, they avoided the increasing pogroms that killed about 100,000 of their people in subsequent years. They missed World War I and the Russian Revolution that killed many more. They missed the great Ukrainian famine perpetrated by Russia that killed millions, and they missed the Nazi incursion that killed about 1.5 Ukrainian Jews. They watched World War II from the relative comfort of their simple homes in Baltimore.

My grandmother fled Vilnius in what is now Lithuania around the same time. Vilnius had been a haven for Jews and a center for Jewish culture. Both of these ancestral locations were part of Russia at the time. My family did not have much love for Russia. But they carried a love for Vilnius and Kyiv that never died.

We saw Europe “join house to house” and now we are seeing Europe “seek her own.”

Needless to say, I am one of many Americans who have been reading news about the Russian invasion of Ukraine on more than a daily basis. I’m hovering, watching, listening, reading as much as I can. Ukraine has so recently become a free country—free from Russia and then free from despotism. We are all inspired by the willingness of everyday Ukrainians to defend their country and democracy.

We are also inspired by the countries of Europe throwing open their borders to the flood of refugees fleeing Ukraine, a flood that began as thousands but that could grow to millions. But wait …

… didn’t those same countries very recently close their borders and throw up barricades to turn away floods of refugees from Africa and the Middle East? At that time, we saw Europe “join house to house” and now we are seeing Europe “seek her own.”

As Ukrainians fled the country, crossing the border into neighboring Poland, Bulgaria’s Prime Minister Kiril Petkov said,

“These are not the refugees we are used to. They are Europeans, intelligent, educated people, some are IT programmers … this is not the usual refugee wave of people with an unknown past. No European country is afraid of them.” And likewise said Al Jazeera English anchor Peter Dobbie. “These are not people trying to get away from areas in North Africa. They look like any European family that you would live next door to.”

And CBS News correspondent Charlie D’Agata said,

“This isn’t a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan, that has seen conflict raging for decades. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European—I have to choose those words carefully too— city, one where you wouldn’t expect that or hope that it’s going to happen.”

All this has caught the eye of Lorraine Ali at the Los Angeles Times, where she draws attention to a bias in some of the press commentary that betrays an inclination for more charity towards white people:

A number of correspondents, consciously or not, framed suffering and displacement as acceptable for Arabs, Afghans, and others over there—but not here, in Europe, where the people “have blue eyes and blond hair” and where they “look like us.” (And yes, those are actual quotations from news clips.)

Political commentator Mehdi Hasan also made sure the discrepancy didn’t go unnoticed—stating on his MSNBC show Sunday:

Europe has been home to some of the worst wars and worst war crimes in human history—I mean, the Holocaust. So why this surprise that bad things are happening in Europe? And second, when they say, ‘Oh, civilized cities’ and, in another clip, ‘Well-dressed people’ and ‘This is not the Third World,’ they really mean white people, don’t they?”

The idea is brought to the forefront more profoundly as black African students studying in Ukraine have been stopped at the border while trying to flee.

A Measure of Introspection Is Demanded of Us as Christians

True charity is or should be the central aspiration of every Christian. The scriptures tell us that without charity, defined as the pure love of Christ, we are nothing.

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

And yet, I think nearly 100% of us are guilty on some level, in some ways, at some times, of “joining house to house” and “seeking our own.”

Of course, there are times and places where borders do need to be reinforced and boundaries maintained. Any country without some kind of boundary can hardly be considered a country. But from individual homes to worship houses to entire countries, when our decisions of who is allowed in—or not—exclude someone on an external characteristic over which they have no control we all need to think twice.

And this may be an especially good time to reflect upon our feelings when North African refugees were banging on the closed gates of the borders in Europe, or when Haitian, Mexican, and Central American refugees were (are) flooding to the southern borders of America. Borders are important to preserve order and safety, but what are the true sources of our own, personal borders internally that influence our opinions of world events, our actions in our own country, and our behavior in our neighborhoods?

Let’s look into our own souls and wrestle with these two aspects of charity—looking out for your own land and your own people—with which we all struggle.

About the author

Gale Boyd

Gale Boyd has been a teacher, poet, author, and editor and is currently the copy editor for Public Square Magazine. Born in D.C. and raised in L.A., she joined the Church at age 16, converting from Science, which was the religion in her home. She discovered her true heritage a few years later and began her deep dive into Judaism at that point. Fifteen years into her temple marriage, her then family of seven began their 14-year adventure in international living by moving to Israel, where they lived for 8 years, adding one more child and changing the trajectory of eight lives.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 6, “Revelation”

Summary – The detectives show up at the Lafferty home to interrogate Ma Lafferty about the whereabouts of Ron and Dan. She claims they are not there. Pyre takes Brother Brady to the basement to interrogate him about the School of the Prophets meetings there. Brady claims that he experienced a “burning of the bosom” during those meetings and questions why Pyre is so sure those revelations weren’t true. In a flashback, Ron travels to Oregon in search of “true Mormonism” from a man named John Bryant. He discovers Bryant’s commune practicing a “free love” version of polygamy and drinking wine, claiming it’s natural and spiritual and that the Word of Wisdom is an outdated part of the temperance movement. During a communal bath, Bryant explains that he’s received a revelation that he is the One Mighty and Strong and asks to baptize Ron. After he does, Ron is overcome with love and kisses Bryant. Ron returns home to find the School of the Prophets working hard to print pamphlets of warning to the Church based on Prophet Onias’s revelations. They demand that polygamy and the priesthood ban for black members be restored. Onias tells Ron he believes that the six Lafferty brothers are chosen to help him in his work. He takes Ron up the mountain to his Dream Mine, where he believes a great treasure is buried under a capstone. Onias tells Ron that he believes Ron is the One Mighty and Strong and that Diana will come back to him when she sees how blessed he is in this work. Later in the episode, Ron writes a revelation to Diana and reads it to the School of the Prophets. They vote on its authenticity and approve it as true, declaring Ron as the one mighty and strong. Meanwhile, in the present, Taba finds a recently sawed-off shotgun and takes this as evidence that Ron and Dan are nearby. When the detectives confront Ma Lafferty, she calls Taba a dark-skinned Lamanite and claims that the only law she’s subject to is the law of God. When they press her, she blames everything on two men who were with her sons, Chip and Ricky, who had long hair and smelled like skunk. In flashback, Allen comes home to Brenda who is distressed about baby Erica’s fever, but Allen refuses to let her go to a doctor until he can figure out whether his brothers are right about not trusting modern medicine. They get into an argument during which he hits her. Brenda stands up and walks out. A little while later, Brenda’s sister comes to take her to the doctor while Brenda’s dad, Bishop Wright, stays with Allen and grills him about being too extreme in his religious beliefs. Meanwhile, Brenda tells her sister she wants to leave Allen because “this is how it started with Diana,” but her sister pressures her to stay or to let her bishop make the decision for her.  At the Pyre’s home, Pyre visits with Bishop Wright and Brenda as he tries to reassure them. The Wrights wonder if Pyre will be swayed by the “power” of the Lafferty name and question what he’ll do if the case causes trouble for people “above.” Pyre swears loyalty to Brenda alone and says that the Laffertys have no hold on him. Brenda’s sister gives Pyre a pile of her sister’s letters, hoping to piece together the events leading up to the murder. After the Wrights leave, Pyre gives his mother a bath. Grandma Pyre admits that she pinched Pyre’s wife and claims “the devil made me do it.” Pyre uses a “fake” priesthood blessing to calm her and get her to rinse her hair. In flashbacks, Diana and Brenda’s letter got her a meeting with a member of the Seventy. The men offer the solution that “true revelation causes an increase in love and appreciation for the brethren.” Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as a counterargument, saying that Brigham Young commanded it and it couldn’t have been inspired. The seventies try to push the issue aside, but Allen accuses them of inconsistency and storms out. Brenda asks the seventies to approve a divorce, but instead, they give Brenda a blessing, calling her to bring the Laffertys back into the fold. Brenda takes up this cause very literally, buying forbidden store-bought goods for her sisters-in-law and sending missionaries to talk with them. As a result of this meddling, Matilda arrives on Brenda’s doorstep with a warning: “A wife who alienates her husband from her children risks her life.” Because of this threat, Bishop Low and his wife smuggle Diana and her children out of town, though Brenda insists on staying to carry out her calling. Pyre asks Allen about the likelihood that his brothers will leave Diana alone, but this conversation devolves into a discussion of Pyre’s faith crisis. Allen says he “tried to defeat the Church in my mind and see what was left.” He tells Pyre about a red book in his house that tells “a truer story of our people.” Pyre takes Allen’s book home and is reading it in the car and sobbing when his wife discovers him. He admits that he’s struggling, and she asks him to pray with her. He tries but he can’t. She tells him that she refuses to struggle through this with him and demands that he bear his testimony in church to strengthen their children’s faith.   Church History – Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as the ultimate example of how revelation is inherently unsafe and unclear. He claims that Brigham Young ordered the massacre. The historical record about whether this is the case is complex, and beyond my scope of expertise. However, I do know that the Church was much more hesitant to comment about the massacre in the 80s, whereas now it has published an essay about the topic as well as supported the publication of a thorough book

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This