Plague-article-image

Learning in a Time of Plague

During a pandemic, it’s tempting to think that it is somehow misguided to be focusing on education. C.S. Lewis boldly and beautifully suggests otherwise.

A student recently confided in me that in light of her growing fears in the face of the current global pandemic it was getting harder and harder for her to concentrate on her academic workload. She assured me that it was not so much the amount of reading and writing that was being required, or even that she had to learn (along with her professors) how to navigate her coursework now that it had been moved entirely to a digital, online, and remote instructional format—although such developments had been challenging in their own right.  Rather, she indicated, her struggle was with seeing the importance of spending so much of her time studying the History of Psychology, Late Elizabethan Literature, Latin 101, and the Sociology of Gender when the world seemed increasingly perilously perched on the edge of a total societal meltdown. 

Fortunately, this is not the first time our world has been thrown into crisis

Each new day we are greeted with more frightening news about death counts, vague and distressing predictions about the likely course this plague may take, each one more dire than the last, and, perhaps most concerning, a proliferation of revelations about how little we actually know about this disease and its lethal spread. In short, my student’s concerns seemed to boil down essentially to this:  “What is the point of all this academic work when people are dying, and the world we’ve always known may be disappearing forever?”

While I certainly understood the fear and confusion this good student was experiencing— having partaken of it myself from time to time—and the central question she was asking, I felt that something more than just empathy was needed here. What she needed was a reassurance that the things she was being called upon to do as a student mattered—still had real meaning—in the face of a global crisis. Many of us have asked similar questions about day-to-day, mundane duties we’re fulfilling in different professions and fields, as well as on the home-front:  does any of this still matter when all this other stuff is happening around us?  Fortunately, this is not the first time our world has been thrown into crisis, either by plague or disaster, natural or man-made nor is it the first time we have had to ask ourselves the sorts of questions my student put to me.

On October 22, 1939, just weeks after Germany had invaded and conquered Poland, thus initiating the Second World War, Oxford scholar and ardent Christian thinker C. S. Lewis preached a sermon at St. Mary the Virgin Church in Oxford entitled “Learning in War-Time.” Lewis had been a soldier in World War I, that “war to end all wars,” and having lived through its aftermath (including the Spanish Flu pandemic that killed over 50 million worldwide and the Great Depression), was now looking on as the great nation-states of the world plunged headlong once again into global conflict a mere two decades later. He, too, was confronted with the very same questions my student was posing to me. Professor Lewis was repeatedly asked how anyone could be expected to spend time and energy indulging their academic curiosity while the world itself was hanging in the balance, as the march to another worldwide war continued onward relentlessly—a march even the least prescient could see would bring about the deaths of millions and witness the unleashing of the most primitive forms of barbarism and cruelty.

“A University is a society for the pursuit of learning,” Lewis wrote. It is a place where students are expected to start making themselves, “into what the Middle Ages called clerks:  into philosophers, scientists, scholarly critics, or historians.” However, in the midst of great crisis, this can seem to be a very odd, perhaps even immoral, thing to be investing oneself in doing. “Is it not,” he asked, “like fiddling while Rome burns?” Here, Lewis firmly answers in the negative, seeking instead to reframe our understanding of the issues at hand, and the values that matter, in the context of a more grounded and hope-filled Christian understanding. He reminds us that it is:

“important to try to see the present calamity in a true perspective, the war [or, in our case, COVID-19] creates no absolutely new situation: it simply aggravates the permanent human situation so that we can no longer ignore it. Human life has always been lived on the edge of a precipice. Human culture has always had to exist under the shadow of something infinitely more important than itself. If men had postponed the search for knowledge and beauty until they were secure the search would never have begun.”

He continues:

“Plausible reasons have never been lacking for putting off all merely cultural activities until some imminent danger has been averted or some crying injustice put right. But humanity long ago chose to neglect those plausible reasons. They wanted knowledge and beauty now, and would not wait for the suitable moment that never comes. Periclean Athens leaves us not only the Parthenon but, significantly, the Funeral Oration. The insects have chosen a different line:  they have sought first the material welfare and security of the hive, and presumably they have their reward. Men are different. They propound mathematical theorems in beleaguered cities, conduct metaphysical arguments in condemned cells, make jokes on scaffold, discuss the last new poem while advancing on the walls of Quebec, and comb their hair at Thermopylae. This is not panache; it is our nature.”

Furthermore, Lewis points out that the life of learning, at least for the student and the professor, must always be an act of submission to the will of God, to the magnification of His purposes and the glorification of His name through the resolute, hopeful, and steady continuance of devotion to seeking truth and beauty, the enduring things of both the spirit and the mind. The temptation to think that our times are not “normal” times, that the human condition has not been one continuous series of struggles, privations, tragedies, and catastrophes, and therefore we are excused from fulfilling the duties and embracing the opportunities that God has blessed us with, is to succumb to a terrible lie. “Do not,” Professor Lewis cautions, “let your nerves and emotions lead you into thinking your present predicament more abnormal than it really is.” Rather, he suggests, “If our parents have sent us to Oxford, if our country allows us to remain here, this is prima facie evidence that the life which we, at any rate, can best lead to the glory of God at present is the learned life. . . . The intellectual life is not the only road to God, nor the safest, but we find it to be a road, and it may be the appointed road for us.”

Finally, Professor Lewis concludes his sermon with these beautiful words:

“But if we thought that for some souls, and at some times, the life of learning, humbly offered to God, was, in its own small way, one of the appointed approaches to the Divine reality and the Divine beauty which we hope to enjoy hereafter, we can think so still.”

In short, then, the current pandemic is truly terrifying, its upheavals no doubt changing the world in ways that will take years to fully grasp, but when it comes to the importance of the life of the mind and the divinely appointed obligation we have to pursue through careful study that which is true and beautiful, nothing has really changed at all.

About the author

Edwin E. Gantt

Edwin E. Gantt is a Professor of Psychology at Brigham Young University. He is the author of numerous scholarly articles and books, including Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Psychological Issues and Who is Truth? Reframing Our Questions for a Richer Faith (co-authored with Dr. Jeffrey L. Thayne). He has a Ph.D. from Duquesne University.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Kinda Pregnant, Kinda Forgettable, Mostly Raunchy

Amy Schumer is a mood.  About ten years ago it seemed like she was about to break out as the next great all-American comedian. But her material never softened. She never found a safe sitcom to mold her jokes into something that would be network-approved. She had her hard stand-up audience and she kept it. “Kinda Pregnant” is perhaps the most Amy Schumer film yet made, and certainly the most since “Trainwreck.” If you like the Amy-Schumer schtick, I imagine you will like this movie. The film is mostly an extension of Schumer’s 2019 special “Growing,” in which she talked about her own pregnancy and her experience with it.  In this film we learn that Schumer’s character Lainy has always wanted to be a mom, but she is now forty and her boyfriend is finally ready to propose. But alas he wasn’t proposing marriage, but proposing having sex with another woman. She soon learns that her best friend Kate is pregnant. Worried that Kate is becoming closer friends with their also pregnant co-worker, Lainy tries on a fake pregnancy belly at a maternity store, and when the clerk accidentally sees her wearing it and is very kind, Lainy decides she’ll pretend to be pregnant. She goes to a pregnancy yoga class, and meets Megan who she makes instant friends with. This means Lainy is living a split life, one pregnant and one unpregnant. There is not a lot of territory left to mine in the fake pregnancy category. Between “Glee,” “Gone Girl,” “Labor Pains,” “Preggoland,” “Desperate Housewives,” and “Baby Mama” the plot device has gone from comedy to drama to action and back again. In typical Schumer fashion she goes gross-out raunchy, which occasionally lapses into a serious talk about the physical and emotional realities of pregnancy and how society treats them.  On that final front, the film does have some interesting observations. The physical realities of pregnancy are weirdly under-discussed, for a society that seems to hold pregnancy as a high honor. But ultimately whatever positive message was there falls apart for two reasons. First the film wants to celebrate family and child birth, but feels the constant need to hedge its endorsement so as not to risk Schumer’s progressive bona fides. And the entire thing is lost in a cavalcade of profanity and gross out jokes about everything from masturbation to farting. I watched “Dog Man” a few weeks ago, a movie for 8-year-old boys, and I’m honestly not sure which movie had more juvenile fart jokes.  The movie does have a few very funny scenes, but for a Happy Madison production, it’s unusually slow. And the writing doesn’t give us the kind of endlessly quotable lines Happy Madison is usually known for. In terms of the comedy, the movie is less bad and more just forgettable. The movie has a very female sensibility, given its subject matter, but it’s presented with the kind of raunchy comedy that has a smaller female audience. If you love Amy Schumer’s comedy, especially if you’ve loved her more recent materials, and you have recently had a baby and feel like no one else really gets what you’re going through, there is a good chance this movie will be among your favorites. Though I’d still recommend using a service that will clean up the worst excesses of the vulgarity—this is a film that earns its R-rating. But if you aren’t in that small group, I imagine the movie might amuse you, but otherwise it will leave you feeling insipid and put off.  One and a half out of five stars. “Kinda Pregnant” premiers on Netflix today, February 5, 2025.

My General Conference Odyssey

Words of prophetic counsel are a constant presence and fixture in most Latter-day Saint lives. But it wasn’t until I started studying them intently that something changed inside me.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!