A Cemetary with Headstones & American Flags | Importance of a Happy Memorial Day | Having a Happy and Reflective Memorial Day

The Politics of Remembrance & The Legacy of Memorial Day

Memorial Day is about remembering and honoring the dead. But it also reveals a history of conflict and the challenge of unity across U.S. history.

As a child, I remember spending a good portion of Memorial Day in cemeteries—learning about the influence departed family members and military heroes had on my life. I must confess I did not always appreciate spending the day that way. As I have grown older, I have learned to better appreciate the wisdom of appropriately remembering the past and those who sacrificed so much so that we can enjoy our present freedoms.

Prior to the American Civil War, there were no national holidays of remembrance. Historians debate when and where the first local observances of memorial days began across the nation, but they generally agree that the first national celebration of Decoration Day (as Memorial Day was originally called) began on May 30, 1868. The idea of a national remembrance holiday was proposed and championed by the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), a powerful Union veterans’ organization. The GAR’s 1868 General Order #11 declared that the “30th day of May 1868, is designated for the purpose of strewing with flowers, or otherwise decorating the graves of comrades who died in defense of their country during the late rebellion, and whose bodies now lie in almost every city, village, and hamlet churchyard in the land. … cherishing tenderly the memory of our heroic dead … Let no vandalism of avarice or neglect, no ravages of time, testify to the present or to the coming generations that we have forgotten as a people the cost of a free and undivided republic.” Memorial Day was celebrated on May 30 each year from 1868 to 1970 when it was redesignated as the last Monday in May.

Public discourse today is unnecessarily contentious.

You might think that the recognition of Memorial Day has been free of political rancor, but you would be mistaken. In spring 1873, GAR members stationed at Camp Douglas outside Salt Lake City solicited funds from northern Utah residents to “decorate the graves of their fellow comrades” on the upcoming Decoration Day. Brigham Young and other local religious leaders made donations that offended some of the GAR members. General Patrick Edward Connor (the first commander of Camp Douglas) declared he desired only “loyal citizens to participate in the [grave-decorating] ceremony, and those of the audience who chose to come he would like to meet him at his office after adjournment” (presumably to ensure they met his definition of being a loyal citizen). The GAR post issued a resolution declaring:

Inasmuch as the Grand Army of the Republic is about to commemorate the day [Decoration Day 1873], and decorate the graves of their fellow comrades, and it appearing that Brigham Young, the President of the Mormon Church, and other leaders of said church … have contributed certain sums of money to assist in defraying the expenses of such decoration, and it further being self-evident that said contributions were not made in good faith, but to subserve the ulterior sinister motives of said Brigham Young, and whereas the acceptance of said contributions would be an insult to the memory of our fellow comrades, Therefore it is Resolved, That the [GAR] General Committee be and are hereby ordered to refund to Brigham Young and all other Mormon leaders, all moneys contributed by them for the purpose.

An increasing portion of public discourse today is unnecessarily contentious—similar, in some ways, to that petty 1873 squabble in Salt Lake City over money freely donated to a worthy cause. We can do better—individually and collectively.

Let us recognize and honor the people who have dedicated their lives and, in many instances, sacrificed their lives for us. One of those people was Father Emil Kapaun, a Catholic priest from Pilsen, Kansas, who served as an American Army chaplain during World War II and the Korean War. On November 1–2, 1950, during the battle of Unsan, nearly 20,000 North Korean and Chinese Communist forces surrounded and attacked 800 Soldiers of the U.S. Third Battalion, Eighth Cavalry Regiment. Throughout the battle, “Kapaun moved fearlessly from foxhole to foxhole under direct enemy fire in order to provide comfort and reassurance to the outnumbered Soldiers. He repeatedly exposed himself to enemy fire to recover wounded men, dragging them to safety. When he couldn’t drag them, he dug shallow trenches to shield them from enemy fire. As Chinese forces closed in, Kapaun rejected several chances to escape, instead volunteering to stay behind and care for the wounded. He was taken as a prisoner of war by Chinese forces on Nov. 2, 1950.”

We are each responsible to teach the rising generation.

He was force-marched with other detainees to the first of two prisoner-of-war camps in North Korea, where he continued to openly aid and assist his fellow captives. For his heroic actions, Chaplain Kapaun posthumously received the Medal of Honor from President Barack Obama in 2013. Part of his citation explains that:

Once inside the dismal prison camps, Kapaun risked his life by sneaking around the camp after dark, foraging for food, caring for the sick, and encouraging his fellow Soldiers to sustain their faith and their humanity. On at least one occasion, he was brutally punished for his disobedience, being forced to sit outside in subzero weather without any garments. When the Chinese instituted a mandatory re-education program, Kapaun patiently and politely rejected every theory put forth by the instructors. Later, Kapaun openly flouted his captors by conducting a sunrise service on Easter morning, 1951.

When Kapaun began to suffer from the physical toll of his captivity, the Chinese transferred him to a filthy, unheated hospital, where he died alone. As he was being carried to the hospital, he asked God’s forgiveness for his captors and made his fellow prisoners promise to keep their faith. Chaplain Kapaun died in captivity on May 23, 1951.

I would suggest that we would do well—not just on Memorial Day—to remember and respectfully honor Chaplain Kapaun and the more than one million men and women who have given their lives in American military service. Learning from their examples can help us better understand the great blessing it is to live in this country. We are each responsible to teach the rising generation and daily practice with each other the time-honored virtues of service, duty, respect, and civility.

About the author

Kenneth L. Alford

Kenneth L. Alford, a retired U.S. Army Colonel, is currently a professor of Church History and Doctrine at Brigham Young University.
On Key

You Might Also Like

When Did We Stop Trusting the Media? A Review of “September 5”

When did we begin to lose trust in the news media? There are plenty of theories. Some suggest March 6, 1981, Walter Cronkite’s last broadcast. Others suggest it was the coverage of President Bill Clinton’s perjury and impeachment. Others suggest it was the advent of 24-hour news stations. The newest film from Paramount Pictures suggests another option in its title, “September 5.” September 5, 1972, is the day that the Black Sabbath militant group kidnapped Israeli Olympic athletes. In total, eleven Israelis were killed. But according to the journalists at the center of the movie, none of that was nearly as important as making sure the “ABC” logo was on the TV screen while the coverage went on. A brief epilogue about how the incident turned out ends with these eerie words, “900 million people watched.”  “September 5” is interesting because, in a movie presumably about the attacks, we see none of it ourselves except through camera lenses and TV screens. It’s not a movie about the attacks at all; it’s a movie about watching the attacks. The film opens as Geoff takes over the control room for ABC Sports. He’s running the night shift, when word comes in about the attacks.  The ABC studios are yards from where the attacks are happening. So they rush Peter Jennings into the Olympic village, and put their own studio camera on top of the building so they can keep a camera on the room where the hostages are being held at all times. Geoff wakes up his bosses, Marvin and Roone, who often debate the relative merits of their decisions, such as whether to turn the story over to ABC News rather than the sports division or whether or not to call the attackers “terrorists.” These compelling arguments make for thoughtful viewing. Ben Chaplin, who plays Roone, an American Jew, does particularly good acting work as he tries to find a nugget of morality in what they are doing.  But every argument ends with the decision being made that will best help ratings and ABC. No matter how many times they argue about good practices, such as waiting for a second confirmation that the hostages were all safe before reporting, the better angels of our trio of decision-makers always lose.  By the way, the hostages weren’t safe, ABC did get the story wrong because they were relying on German state news, and Germany was trying to look safe and less militaristic in their first major international attention since the end of WWII. But for a moment, when the station thought the hostages were safe, their only concern was getting them in the studio for interviews.  Marvin Bader tries to use the language of “the story” as though his audience deserved to have “the story” in real-time. And no matter what decision they made it was in pursuit of capturing the story. But this justification rang shallow as the movie moved on. When the German police burst in to get them to stop telecasting their rescue attempts live because the militants were watching, they stopped to get them to put their guns down, but turned the feed back on nearly as soon as they had left. All of this makes this an engaging movie that is worth watching. When journalists are the main characters, we expect them to be the good guys. “All the President’s Men,” “Spotlight,” “The Post.” Even the film “Shattered Glass” about a dishonest journalist, spends more time highlighting the good journalists who caught him. “September 5” doesn’t offer the media such a convenient way out. By making its characters clear-headed and conflicted, they are more than simple villains. They are exactly what the pressure of studio news would naturally produce. There are real powerful forces driving the decisions of the news industry that are at odds with what is right or good, and all too often, there’s nothing we can do about it. If we are curious about how the spiral of trust began, this film serves as a worthwhile primer while being entertaining as all get out. The film is rated R. It is thematically tough, dealing with questions like whether to broadcast an execution live, but none of the violence of the incident is actually seen the movie. In terms of a ratings feel, I might compare it to the film “Gravity” while using the word “f***” three more times than is allowed in a PG-13 film. I wouldn’t recommend this for young children or young teens, but the themes about how media manipulates us would be important for older teens, and I might consider watching this film with my kids once they turn 15 or so.  If I did, I’d ask them questions about the nature of journalism. Is getting the story more important than the lives of the kidnapped Olympic team? Do we need to know about what’s happening in real-time on the other side of the world? How has constant news coverage made the world a better or worse place? What motivates those who choose what to show on the news, and how they tell those stories? Four out of Five Stars. September 5 has already had a limited release, and it is rolling out in individual markets across the country through January. 

Politicizing the Pandemic

Living in a pandemic is scary enough. But when we can’t figure out what is true (and even the data gets politicized), it makes things all that harder. That makes it even more important to think critically and look into different perspectives.

National Day of Prayer Primer

In commemoration of The National Day of Prayer, here are some readings on prayer. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich Last year, Samuel Hislop recommended this book. The book contains an extended conversation between Ivan and Alyosha about the nature and efficacy of prayer. A must-read on the nature of faith in difficult times. The Priceless Privilege of Prayer Bruce D. Porter gave a BYU devotional examining ways that our prayers can be dishonest, looking at the example of Huckleberry Finn. President Nelson on the National Day of Prayer  President Nelson today published on social media, “On this National Day of Prayer, I have been pondering the evolving meaning in our society of the phrase ‘thoughts and prayers.’ For many, this is still a sincere expression of condolence and concern. For others, it is viewed as a perceived lack of action in the face of tragedy.” He goes on to explain how important prayers can be in the face of tragedy, and how it inspires him to action. The Power of Prayer Meleane Unga gave a devotional at BYU-Hawaii and spoke about how her father’s prayers growing up helped give her a model for how to deal with difficulties in her life. A powerful example of the personal importance of prayer. Four-Year-Old Me Prayed My Mom Would Have Eight Arms You’ll have to forgive me for including an old article I wrote myself detailing how I learned to recognize the unexpected answers to prayer. Religion for Adults Means Embracing Complexity Sarah Hurwitz wrote in the Wall Street Journal in 2019 about what a grown-up faith means, including the importance of prayer. One of the most thoughtful pieces on prayer in a national newspaper in the last decade.        

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!