chuttersnap-N1AIhjauyrU-unsplash (1)

Let’s Forgive 2020

If you’re eager to move on from 2020, join the club. Before we do, let’s do one thing first.

In 2006, Michael Rowe was 13 years into a 20-year prison sentence for murder. His victim had been 17-year-old Wilfredo Colón, a drug dealer in a rival gang; they had been involved in a territory dispute. Years later, as Rowe was sitting in the prison visiting room, he noticed a familiar face among the visitors. It was Anthony Colón, Wifredo’s younger brother. Rowe tried to keep his head down, hoping Anthony wouldn’t notice or recognize him. But Anthony did recognize him, and to Rowe’s surprise, he warmly smiled. Anthony approached Rowe, and reached out to shake his hand. Anthony’s words for his brother’s killer? “Brother, I’ve been praying for you. I forgave you. I’ve been praying I would see you again.” In the years between Wilfredo’s murder and Rowe and Anthony’s meeting, Anthony had gone from an angry, resentful teenager to a husband, father, and devout Christian. Rowe had married his girlfriend from before his incarceration, and completed his high school and undergraduate education. After their meeting, Anthony started visiting Rowe regularly until his release, even attending Rowe’s master’s degree ceremony. Rowe was later released, and he went on to work in various nonprofits serving at-risk and formerly incarcerated young men. According to Anthony, God has a purpose for both of them. 

Fyodor Dostoevsky’s masterpiece Crime and Punishment tells the story of Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov, a bitter, impoverished young law school dropout who has the sense that he is too brilliant for the rest of the world. His conflicted morals lead him to murder a miserly old pawnbroker and her sister—the pawnbroker because he thinks the world will be better without her taking advantage of others, and the sister because she has the misfortune of walking in on the crime. Raskolnikov, miserable with guilt, paranoid, and confused, finds an unlikely supporter in Sonya, a devout Christian young woman who is forced to prostitute herself to care for her family in the absence of her drunk, and later dead, father. Despite considering Sonya a “religious fanatic,” Raskolnikov asks her to read the Bible to him, finding comfort in the story of Christ raising Lazarus from the dead. Through Sonya’s love and guidance, Raskolnikov turns himself in to the police and eventually begins his road to redemption.

This is the good news of the gospel: that we are utterly, unequivocally redeemable – even (and especially) when everything feels lost. Regardless, Jesus Christ bids every single one of us to come unto him and be made whole. The murderer, the jealous brothers who sold their brother into slavery, the prophet who rejected God’s call, the adulterer, the ne’er do well son—none are too far gone. We are all children of the Almighty God. We can all embrace the fresh start that the gospel offers.

As we seek to move into a new year, it may be time to dust off one of the most durable of Christian principles and apply it in a rather unique way. Let’s forgive 2020.

Essential to redemption is, of course, forgiveness—not just that we can be forgiven, but that we must forgive. The Lord does not mince words on this subject. “I, the Lord, will forgive whom I will forgive, but of you it is required to forgive all men” (D&C 65:10). 

This year has brought out a unique kind of hatred – and not just between people. Twitter last week, started an advertising campaign highlighting what they described as “Screw 2020” tweets. While Netflix has thrown together a star-studded comedy calling for “Death to 2020.”

It’s been nearly impossible, as this tough year has come to a close, to ignore the way 2020 has been anthropomorphized to collectively receive all of our hate.

So as we seek to move into a new year, it may be time to dust off one of the most durable of Christian principles and apply it in a rather unique way. Let’s forgive 2020.  

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland has called forgiveness “central to the grandeur of the Atonement of Jesus Christ.” And in their new book, All Things New: Rethinking Sin, Salvation, and Everything in Between, Terryl and Fiona Givens write: 

Regardless of my personal sanctity or righteousness, I cannot experience a celestial existence if love does not flow without inhibition between myself and all members of that heavenly community. Because … loving relationships are not preparation for heaven— they constitute heaven. In a very real sense, our own willingness to set aside our hurts and injuries has a direct, essential bearing on the quality of that heaven enjoyed by others—and vice versa.

Likewise, in Surprised by Hope, N.T. Wright describes forgiveness as “a way of life, God’s way of life, God’s way to life.” He continues:

If you close your heart to forgiveness, why, then you close your heart to forgiveness. That is the point of the terrifying parable in Matthew 18, about the slave who had been forgiven millions but then dragged a colleague into court to settle a debt of a few pence. If you lock up the piano because you don’t want to play to somebody else, how can God play to you? That is why we pray, “Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.” That isn’t a bargain we make with God. It’s a fact of human life. Not to forgive is to shut down a faculty in the innermost person, which happens to be the same faculty that can receive God’s forgiveness.

When we choose to forgive, then, it does not just serve the person whom we are forgiving. In fact, the primary beneficiary may actually be ourselves, as we are freed from the burden of anger and we become more like our Heavenly Parents.

As applied to 2020 then, we don’t need to force ourselves into looking for faux-silver linings, we rather need to open our hearts to moving on.

As 2020, a year of sickness, death, contention, injustice, suffering, isolation, and exhaustion, comes to a close, we all need the fresh start that the gospel brings. We all need forgiveness and redemption. For those of us inclined to write goals and resolutions for the new year, perhaps then we could expand the forgiveness of the year to find opportunities to forgive others around us too.  

Forgiveness for your anti-masker brother-in-law. Forgiveness for your neighbor, who thinks your small business should stay closed to contain the spread of the virus. Forgiveness for the CEO who didn’t take a pay cut and instead took away Christmas bonuses. Forgiveness for the person who said your protest was the wrong kind. Forgiveness for the Biden voter. Forgiveness for the Trump voter. Forgiveness for a co-religionist who said something insensitive or unkind or judgemental about your gender or race or politics. Forgiveness for the family member who is quick to judge and slow to listen. 

All of them.  How would that feel?  

We all need a fresh start – a new life – in 2021. If forgiveness is God’s way to life, then let’s take Him seriously and embrace this gift, letting go of what has come, so we can receive something new in the year to come. 

About the author

Amanda Freebairn

Amanda Freebairn is an associate editor and the editorial production coordinator at Public Square Magazine, and a contributor to Deseret News. She holds an M.Ed. from Arizona State University. She and her husband live with their 3 children in Bluffdale, Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven

In an age that claims to value “own voices” media, it is sad that Under the Banner of Heaven is probably going to be the biggest story that the public sees about members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints this year or this decade. While the tale it tells is based on an actual occurrence and about some actual problems within the broader movement of people hearkening back to Joseph Smith, one thing that can’t be said for either the book or the show was that they were written by a member of our community. The producer may have “grown up” as a Latter-day Saint, but he left the faith before he was an adult. If you’ve never had the experience of holding a calling, making temple covenants, or negotiating the relationships that make up a ward (Latter-day Saint congregation), are you really the best person to interpret our community? So I’m stepping in to offer my perspective. I am not a historian or theologian. So, though I try to be informed about the difficult parts of our religion’s past, I can only give you the perspective of what an average member would know or believe about these situations. I undoubtedly will get some of the nuances wrong. This will not be the best place if you’re looking for information about the historical accuracy of the show. (Consider checking FAIR’s guide or Book of Mormon Central.) However, I am an active participant in the larger Latter-day Saint literary community. I’ve written essays about my own life as a woman in the Church and fictional stories about others. I studied Latter-day Saint literature in college and continue reading contemporary Latter-day Saint literature. I am on the board of the Association for Mormon Letters, an organization that promotes literature written by, for, or about those who tie back to the prophet Joseph (including members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but not exclusive to our denomination). So you might say I have some experience with portrayals of the Latter-day Saints and separate fundamentalist communities. The purpose of this series of recaps is two-fold. First, I want to summarize the series for ordinary Latter-day Saints who don’t intend to watch it so they won’t be surprised around the metaphorical watercooler this week. Second, I will catalog the series as it compares to Latter-day Saint literature more broadly. As a writer, reader, and advocate of Latter-day Saint literature, this is my home turf. I am interested to see where the show gets things right and wrong. Granted, my experience isn’t the experience of every member; like any community, Latter-day Saints are not a monolith. But I will compare the show to my personal knowledge of our community and talk about what sticks out. Without further ado, here are my impressions of the first two episodes of Under the Banner of Heaven. Episode 1, “When God Was Love”  Summary—The episode opens with Detective Pyre being called away from his family’s Pioneer Day celebrations to visit a crime scene. At an ordinary suburban house, he finds a scene of chaos with a mother (Brenda Lafferty) and her 15-month-old daughter (Erica) murdered in a gruesome way. (Luckily, we are only shown large quantities of blood on the floor and walls; the show shies away from showing the bodies, though we will get hints through dialogue about the exact method of killing.) Soon the husband (Allen Lafferty) is taken into custody, his clothes soaked in his wife’s blood. The killer claims that his wife was murdered by men with beards like “Mormon prophets” and continually ties his wife’s murder back to early church history stories, particularly Joseph and Emma marrying against her father’s will. We then get a flashback to a young Brenda. She is an energetic and ambitious young woman who transfers to BYU after being tired of “holding girl’s hair back while they puked” at her party school in Idaho. Allen introduces Brenda to his family at a large family dinner. His brothers seem both strangely attracted to her and judgmental of her for her ambition and less strict faith (caffeinated soda is mentioned). The Lafferty family band together to clear a neighbor’s land to prevent it from being seized by the federal government to build a highway. In the present, Detective Pyre’s partner Bill visits Allen’s brother Robin’s home and finds the house abandoned and papers burning. They arrest Robin after a chase through a motel. This episode depicts the First Vision. It shows Joseph going to the woods to pray and a light shining down on him. The script draws parallels between Joseph’s prayer and Robin’s prayer in the woods before he is caught by the police, which doesn’t really make much sense except that they are both kneeling in a natural setting. We also get a scene of Joseph and Emma discussing whether to marry against her father’s wishes. The show tries to make a big deal of them choosing between “God’s will” and her father’s authority, implying that the problem is that they can justify almost anything as God’s will. I found this assertion pretty strange, given that Joseph and Emma were hardly the first couple to marry against a parent’s wishes. It seems a thin justification on which to hang a condemnation of trusting God. Shibboleths—It’s apparent that the showrunners have made an effort to try to include jargon of Latter-day Saints in the dialogue. Sometimes this works: the Pyre family prayer scene feels exactly like the ones that take place in my family. Others make it apparent that the writers are not members of the community. While we do refer to God as Heavenly Father, particularly in prayer, we don’t use this term exclusively like the characters in the show. I regularly hear members refer to him as “God” or “the Lord,” and a brief search of the church’s 1980’s general conference talks shows that this isn’t a new innovation. While there is

Living as the Angels Do

Even with so much suffering around us, I rejoice to have witnessed much suffering tangibly relieved by real-life, creative ministries to the poor. What more is still possible?