A family dinner scene featuring a robot figure in place of a parent, symbolizing raising the AI generation.

The Allure of Automation: AI’s Intrusion on Parental and Family Agency

Does AI undermine parental agency? It shifts reliance onto digital tools that erode genuine family bonds.

This is our next article in our Proclamation series. To read the last one: Why Marriage, Sex and Family are Keys to Sanctification

I’m still startled by an electronically declared “Hello, Master” whenever I turn on my truck. The artificial intelligence sweeping our society impacts me daily with a casual, “Hey, let me do that for you” or “I’ve got this” availability when I pick up my mobile device or log online. While technology connects us in infinite ways, the physical and psychological effects of reduced in-person, one-on-one relationships loom large, potentially impacting individuals, families, and the broader society.

 The prospect of singularity caused me to consider artificial intelligence’s potential impact on parental relationships and the doctrinal verities of agency and truth.

Approaching Singularity

 AI advances will offer even more opportunities to intertwine self and technology. Artificial intelligence is defined as “the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems” or “automation based on associations.” Those simulations and associations are astonishing.

The more far-reaching, socially-shifting aspects of AI may require increased engagement by involved parents.

 Artificial intelligence’s rapid advancement causes most technology experts to predict that singularity will happen in the near future as AI’s capacities surpass human cognitive capabilities enabling its autonomous function. For now, technology right out of the movies to real life materialized in the form of brain-computer interfaces which enable a neurally-linked brain implant to translate a person’s neural signals into computer commands.

 In 1999, technological prophet Ray Kurzweil predicted AI would impersonate human beings by 2029, asserting that Artificial General Intelligence, or AI with the ability to reason, will soon be a reality and promising that by 2029 “AI will be ‘better than all humans,’ in ‘every skill possessed by any human.’” Noting humans’ propensity for failure and weakness, Kurzweil optimistically looks forward to AI-enhanced and linked minds and bodies. “If we can meet the scientific, ethical, social and political challenges posed by these advances, we will transform life on earth profoundly for the better. … [Humans] are far from optimal, especially with regard to thinking.” Kurzweil advocates for transhumanism “where we are partly organic tissue and partly mechanical parts, the natural progression will be toward greater and greater dependence on ever more rapid computer-augmented thinking and consciousness.” For Kurzweil, transhumanism enables immortality.

 Singularity and Parenting 

 As AI advances forward, a flurry of articles and books about its foreseen impact on parenting emerge. “The rapid acceleration of AI capabilities signals a paradigm shift where traditional models of parental engagement may no longer suffice.”  A paradigm shift isn’t necessarily negative. Certainly, every generation experiencing technological advances adjusts its parenting styles. 

 Parents embracing AI find tools to more effectively manage time, automate repetitive tasks, monitor and enhance their family’s health and safety, and receive recommendations specific to their particular family’s circumstances. And while incredibly convenient apps exist to streamline the everyday household’s functionality, the more far-reaching, socially-shifting aspects of AI may require increased engagement by involved parents. In studying the family response to interactive AI, Druga, Christoph, and Ko suggest eight roles parents play as they navigate AI with their children: cheerleader, mediator, mentor, student, teacher, observer, tinkerer, and collaborator. 

 Some not-too-far-in-the-future hypothetical scenarios parents may face could include these proposed by Murchú:

  • Emotional Synchronisation: Parents could experience their child’s emotional state during learning in real-time through neural feedback loops. For instance, a parent might directly sense their child’s frustration with a mathematical concept, allowing for immediate intervention.
  • Thought-Based Tutoring: Parents could engage in direct thought-to-thought tutoring sessions where complex concepts are shared through neural visualization. Example: A parent explaining photosynthesis by sharing their mental model directly into their child’s cognitive space, enhanced by AI-generated interactive molecular visualizations. 
  • Decision Impact Visualisation: Real-time modeling of how parental decisions affect cognitive development. For instance, an AI might show parents a neural network visualization of how choosing between coding classes or music lessons would differently shape their child’s synaptic development.
  • Manage Cognitive Enhancement Choices: Parents could face decisions about implementing various cognitive enhancements for their children.
  • Emotional Intelligence Programming: Parents could help children develop enhanced emotional capabilities through AI-mediated emotional training.
  • Bio-Digital Balance: As children integrate more deeply with technology, parents would need to guide the harmony between biological and digital aspects of their children’s development.

While many parents will step up to the role of shepherding their children through increased technological influence, after a long day at work, other parents may prefer to let their kids navigate AI themselves in an increasingly leveled-up version of screen time. Murchú posits that “While the transformative potential of AI in parental engagement is undeniable, the risks of dependency and societal inequity cannot be overlooked. Over-reliance on AI could erode critical parental skills, reduce human autonomy, and create disparities between technologically advanced and underserved communities. … Failure to address these challenges risks undermining the fundamental human aspects of parenting and education. As we approach technological singularity, maintaining a balance between leveraging AI capabilities and preserving human agency will be critical.” 

 Considering Singularity within the Doctrines of Agency and Truth

 The Father’s plan of happiness and Jesus Christ’s atonement champion human agency. Lehi taught his children that God “created all things … things to act and things to be acted upon. And to bring about his eternal purposes … the Lord God gave unto man that he should act for himself.”

The principle of agency will help parents navigate AI with their children.

The Family: A Proclamation to the World is a divinely directed, prophetic guideline that combats technologically-induced decreased parental interactions by explaining our renewable relationship with Heavenly Parents and the relationships that should flourish in mortality as we “act for [ourselves].”

 Parents have a sacred duty to rear their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the commandments of God, and to be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives—mothers and fathers—will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.

 Elder David A. Bednar reiterated that the principle of agency will help parents navigate AI with their children. “God’s creations include both ‘things to act and things to be acted upon.’ And, importantly, moral agency is the divinely designed ‘power of independent action’ that empowers us as God’s children to become agents to act and not simply objects to be acted upon. … Because AI is cloaked in the credibility and promises of scientific progress, we might naively be seduced into surrendering our precious moral agency to a technology that can only think telestial. By so doing, we may gradually be transformed from agents who can act into objects that are only acted upon.”

Parents bombarded with options and gadgets can still turn to an ever-reliable source of truth.

 Becoming agents to act stimulates the creative prowess within. According to Brigham Young, “Every discovery in science and art that is really true and useful to mankind has been given by direct revelation from God. It has been given with a view to prepare the way for the ultimate triumph of truth, and the redemption of the earth from the power of sin and Satan.  We should take advantage of all these great discoveries … and give to our children the benefit of every branch of useful knowledge, to prepare them to step forward and efficiently do their part in the great work” (Deseret News, 22 Oct. 1862, 129).

 Though creations and discoveries are neither intrinsically good nor evil, they can become tools for both good and evil. From his prophetic watchtower, David O. McKay aptly described our day: “Discoveries latent with such potent power, either for the blessing or the destruction of human beings, as to make men’s responsibility in controlling them the most gigantic ever placed in human hands. This age is fraught with limitless perils as well as untold possibilities” (David O. McKay, in Conference Report, Oct. 1966, 4).

 While an incredibly useful component of society, in this stage of its development, this simulation or associative intelligence is still artificial, and humans create its data stores with inherent biases and predispositions. However, parents bombarded with options and gadgets can still turn to an ever-reliable source of truth. The Lord declared, “I am the way, the truth, and the life,” and that true intelligence is “the glory of God … or, in other words, light and truth,” and while it cannot be created or made, it is the power by which everything in our universe is made.  God’s “work and glory to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” relies on parents’ knowing truth about eternal identities and then conveying that truth within eternal relationships.

Artificial intelligence can be a powerfully supportive or destructive tool for parents trying to fulfill this “sacred duty.”

 AI “has the potential to obscure our true identity as sons and daughters of a loving Heavenly Father, distract us from the eternal truths and righteous work necessary for spiritual growth, engender pride and a diminished acknowledgment of our dependence upon God, and distort or replace meaningful human interaction,” Elder David A. Bednar warned. “Truth is knowledge of things as they really are. Artificial intelligence cannot simulate, imitate, or replace the influence of the Holy Ghost in our lives. No matter how sophisticated and elegant AI technology ultimately may become, it simply can never bear witness of the Father and the Son, reveal the truth of all things, or sanctify those who have repented and been baptized.”

The opportunity to raise children “in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the commandments of God and to be law-abiding citizens” is an incredible trust given by God to parents.  Artificial intelligence can be a powerfully supportive or destructive tool for parents trying to fulfill this “sacred duty.” While AI prophet Ray Kurzweil’s general assessment that humans are “far from optimal” may be realistic, our Heavenly Father, the divine source of real truth, compensates for the natural man’s failings by underpinning His parent-child relationship with us by providing a Savior whose atoning grace enables us to navigate parental roles amidst technology’s singularity with agency and truth.

About the author

Delisa Bushman Hargrove

Delisa Bushman Hargrove is a freelance writer and editor. On her channel at Patheos.com, she explores various aspects of faith-based living and is especially drawn to doctrinal symbolisms effectively interspersed within the Father’s plan of salvation.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Nigerian religious freedom concerns

There is concerning news out of Nigeria. Mubarak Bala was sentenced to serve twenty-four years in prison for the crime of being an atheist. Bala whose been in prison for several years awaiting conviction has been forced to worship as a Muslim. Today the United States Commission on Religious Freedom issued a statement condemning the prosecution. While Nigeria’s constitution protects the freedom of religion, in practice religious freedom is concerning in Nigeria. This sad incident intersects with US politics because of Biden administration’s treatment of Nigeria. Last November, the State Department, controversially, removed Nigeria from the list of countries of particular concern on religious freedom. This incident was one of the major factors in the poor score I gave in my one-year report card on President Biden’s work on religious freedom. This incident with Bala suggests that religious freedom is now functionally non-existent in Nigeria.

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven

In an age that claims to value “own voices” media, it is sad that Under the Banner of Heaven is probably going to be the biggest story that the public sees about members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints this year or this decade. While the tale it tells is based on an actual occurrence and about some actual problems within the broader movement of people hearkening back to Joseph Smith, one thing that can’t be said for either the book or the show was that they were written by a member of our community. The producer may have “grown up” as a Latter-day Saint, but he left the faith before he was an adult. If you’ve never had the experience of holding a calling, making temple covenants, or negotiating the relationships that make up a ward (Latter-day Saint congregation), are you really the best person to interpret our community? So I’m stepping in to offer my perspective. I am not a historian or theologian. So, though I try to be informed about the difficult parts of our religion’s past, I can only give you the perspective of what an average member would know or believe about these situations. I undoubtedly will get some of the nuances wrong. This will not be the best place if you’re looking for information about the historical accuracy of the show. (Consider checking FAIR’s guide or Book of Mormon Central.) However, I am an active participant in the larger Latter-day Saint literary community. I’ve written essays about my own life as a woman in the Church and fictional stories about others. I studied Latter-day Saint literature in college and continue reading contemporary Latter-day Saint literature. I am on the board of the Association for Mormon Letters, an organization that promotes literature written by, for, or about those who tie back to the prophet Joseph (including members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but not exclusive to our denomination). So you might say I have some experience with portrayals of the Latter-day Saints and separate fundamentalist communities. The purpose of this series of recaps is two-fold. First, I want to summarize the series for ordinary Latter-day Saints who don’t intend to watch it so they won’t be surprised around the metaphorical watercooler this week. Second, I will catalog the series as it compares to Latter-day Saint literature more broadly. As a writer, reader, and advocate of Latter-day Saint literature, this is my home turf. I am interested to see where the show gets things right and wrong. Granted, my experience isn’t the experience of every member; like any community, Latter-day Saints are not a monolith. But I will compare the show to my personal knowledge of our community and talk about what sticks out. Without further ado, here are my impressions of the first two episodes of Under the Banner of Heaven. Episode 1, “When God Was Love”  Summary—The episode opens with Detective Pyre being called away from his family’s Pioneer Day celebrations to visit a crime scene. At an ordinary suburban house, he finds a scene of chaos with a mother (Brenda Lafferty) and her 15-month-old daughter (Erica) murdered in a gruesome way. (Luckily, we are only shown large quantities of blood on the floor and walls; the show shies away from showing the bodies, though we will get hints through dialogue about the exact method of killing.) Soon the husband (Allen Lafferty) is taken into custody, his clothes soaked in his wife’s blood. The killer claims that his wife was murdered by men with beards like “Mormon prophets” and continually ties his wife’s murder back to early church history stories, particularly Joseph and Emma marrying against her father’s will. We then get a flashback to a young Brenda. She is an energetic and ambitious young woman who transfers to BYU after being tired of “holding girl’s hair back while they puked” at her party school in Idaho. Allen introduces Brenda to his family at a large family dinner. His brothers seem both strangely attracted to her and judgmental of her for her ambition and less strict faith (caffeinated soda is mentioned). The Lafferty family band together to clear a neighbor’s land to prevent it from being seized by the federal government to build a highway. In the present, Detective Pyre’s partner Bill visits Allen’s brother Robin’s home and finds the house abandoned and papers burning. They arrest Robin after a chase through a motel. This episode depicts the First Vision. It shows Joseph going to the woods to pray and a light shining down on him. The script draws parallels between Joseph’s prayer and Robin’s prayer in the woods before he is caught by the police, which doesn’t really make much sense except that they are both kneeling in a natural setting. We also get a scene of Joseph and Emma discussing whether to marry against her father’s wishes. The show tries to make a big deal of them choosing between “God’s will” and her father’s authority, implying that the problem is that they can justify almost anything as God’s will. I found this assertion pretty strange, given that Joseph and Emma were hardly the first couple to marry against a parent’s wishes. It seems a thin justification on which to hang a condemnation of trusting God. Shibboleths—It’s apparent that the showrunners have made an effort to try to include jargon of Latter-day Saints in the dialogue. Sometimes this works: the Pyre family prayer scene feels exactly like the ones that take place in my family. Others make it apparent that the writers are not members of the community. While we do refer to God as Heavenly Father, particularly in prayer, we don’t use this term exclusively like the characters in the show. I regularly hear members refer to him as “God” or “the Lord,” and a brief search of the church’s 1980’s general conference talks shows that this isn’t a new innovation. While there is

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!