
The choice between pride and shame is a false binary—transcending both enables a growth mindset more conducive to durable Christian discipleship.

Discernment is not spiritual mind reading, but the grace to judge with humility, charity, and Christlike care.

The Church Educational System is answering young adults’ loneliness with faith, mentors, and real belonging.

How should fidelity to country be manifested? It must combine reverence for founding principles with responsible critique and relentless pursuit of just laws.

Those who disagree with medical and social transition efforts deserve therapy that respects their values.
The New Yorker published a story last week about the authorship and provenance of the 1971 book Go Ask Alice. The book is presented as the diary of a teenage girl, but a new book suggests that it was composed by Beatrice Sparks, a woman who claimed to only have found the diary and edited it. The article is a fine read, asking interesting questions about the ethics of publication, and the difficulties of identifying authorship. But near the end of the article they include this line, “As a few ex-Mormons have pointed out, Sparks was not the first Mormon to publish a text ostensibly based on an original source that the rest of the world did not get to see.” The line takes a not-quite veiled swipe at the founding of the religion that Sparks was a member of. I can’t help but wonder if Sparks was a Catholic, would the author have been as comfortable opining, “Sparks is not the first Catholic to put out a book where the original sources aren’t available.” This kind of winking attack feels more fitting on the ex-Mormon Reddit than in a major publication like the New Yorker.

What does it mean when we’re deeply uncomfortable with what someone else has said? Has a great wrong been done? Christian teaching highlights another (uncomfortable) possibility.