Man w/ Flowers, Looking at Tombstone in Cemetery | Make The Good Times Stop: Pop Culture’s Fixation on Eternal Oblivion | Public Square Magazine | Eternal Oblivion

Making Meaning of COVID Loss

Job's words, "The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord," are especially meaningful post-COVID.

The Germans would have a word for it, like they do for Sehnsuchta feeling of longing for something unknown. But so far no descriptor exists for the sensation of coming across pre-planned events scribbled on a 2020 calendar that no longer exist. April’s dental and hair appointments. May’s banquet to laud the teenager’s track team season, which disappeared after the first meet. Or trips, like the June flights to celebrate a son’s commencement, canceled after six long years of PhD work. And what of July, August, September? Will anyone really go back to school, or will this ever be over? 

Our family’s COVID losses arrived, mercifully, more in volume than in magnitude: high school’s spring rituals canceled, several college internships revoked, a church mission evacuated just as language fluency emerged, and living disruptions resulting in, at one point, eleven of us quarantined togetherreplete with in-laws, a granddaughter, all our idiosyncrasies, and grocery shortages. But we’ve hung on to our health, so far, and, also so far, our jobs, unlike many whose losses cut painfully deeper.

But we also experienced, along with the discomfiting sensation of a life unmoored and upended, some unexpected grace. During the quarantine phase, we played games, took walks, painted a weathered fence, and got out the sewing machine initially to make face masks, but also ended up sewing pajamas and a pink toddler dress. After the birth of a new grandson, we took our first family photo in five years with everyone present. And then, as restrictions lifted and everyone dispersed, the nomenclature came up short again. How to describe the phenomenon of missing the compensation that loss bestowed as the shared cooking, cleaning, and bonding came to an end and, of those still left, no one wants to go on a walk anymore?

What about the art of accepting what’s beyond our control and of harboring hope for better things to come? Can our losses at least give us that?

As if to compensate for a dearth of idioms with which to make sense of loss and its paradoxes, an abundance of literature expounds on the subject. As spring 2020’s global and personal losses persisted into summer, I revisited Rabbi David Wolpe’s contribution, Making Loss Matter: Creating Meaning in Difficult Times. Wolpe’s vision takes up Job’s refrain that Novel Coronavirus continues reiterating around the world: “The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.” There is taking, but also giving, and even in loss, nature abhors a vacuum. Our deprivations, both minor and disastrous, make room for new matternot just silver linings and opened windows to accompany closed doors, but alternate paths that replace shredded multi-colored coats with meaningful missions. If nothing else, when all is said and done, loss at least bestows wisdom if our hearts are open to it. 

After all, according to Wolpe and the biblical and personal journeys he wends through, life consists of a continual series of losses to grow from. We lose our old selvesselves which can embarrass us in retrospect even while retaining “an unrecoverable magic”yet we evolve into more mature selves and identities. We lose our childhood homes, repeating the story of leaving Eden for the threatening world at large, but find new ones, sometimes even inside ourselves. We lose in love, for as Wolpe points out, “there is no deep love without loss.” Yet we learn to love again, finding that “out of pain comes the steepest growth because the resources of the soul are most severely taxed.” And we also lose faith, both atheistic and religious, as we replace simplistic notions that the world must be just or fair, or that we will be spared suffering if we are good enough, with a deeper faith “tough and lasting…durable enough to outlast even its own periodic absence.” 

For fastidious planners like me who calendar out months, even years at a time under the illusion that goal setting will somehow hold future demons at bay, a much-needed takeaway is Wolpe’s assertion that “acceptance of the unpredictability of life, the loss of the illusion of control, is a crucial mark of maturity… [for] life refuses to be broken and tamed.” The calendar items, jobs, and health that Covid-19 keeps erasing contribute not only to our sense of loss but compound our sense of powerlessness. Here, Wolpe’s chapter on lost dreams is particularly helpful, for dreams, indeed, get deferred, careers halted, businesses downturned, and good health ravaged. But losing our dreams “of what should have been,” writes Wolpe, gives us “the gift of what might be.” Just as juvenile delusions of grandeur give way to more realistic possibilities, a dream can be transformed, at least leaving “wisdom in its wake.”

Admittedly, I’m often tempted into poet Elizabeth Bishop’s more pessimistic vision. In her famous poem “One Art,” she posits that “the art of losing’s not too hard to master,” then ironically belies that premise by poignantly listing the things that “seem filled with the intent to be lost that their loss is no disaster”: “lost door keys, the hour badly spent,” “my mother’s watch,” “my last, or next-to-last, of three loved houses,” and finally, “losing you (the joking voice, a gesture I love) I shan’t have lied…though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.”

Grace persists, too, even for us twenty-first-century wimps.

The art of losing is indeed hard to master and often feels like disaster even with all the practice life bestows. But what about the art of accepting what’s beyond our control and of harboring hope for better things to come? Can our losses at least give us that?  Victor Frankl surrendered the manuscript of his life’s work when he entered a concentration camp but replaced it with the conviction that instead of writing about his ideas, he would have to live them out. He, of anyone, proved that, however powerless we find ourselves in certain conditions, we haven’t lost our ability to find meaning in them.

I should have re-visited Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl’s lived testament, as news of the pandemic escalated and I panicked over potential sickness, lost opportunities, and retirement funds, and the demise of the easily traveled pre-pandemic world we’d known. Instead, I found a strange solace in reading Caroline Moorehead’s biography of Lucie de la Tour du Pin, Dancing to the Precipice. It doesn’t get much more out-of-control and loss-filled than going from being a French noble of the ancien regime (with your mother a lady-in-waiting to Marie Antoinette) to escaping the guillotine, losing several fortunes and homes, traipsing from country to country, and, in the cruelest twist of all, burying all but one of your beloved children. 

Two centuries before Martin Seligman’s academically compelling observations on the power of positive psychology—that even after controlling for socio-economic and differing circumstances, those who rewire their thought processes toward hope over despair do better in careers, relationships, and health—Lucie seems the historical poster child for Seligman’s “learned optimism.” I particularly appreciated the biographer’s pauses after each blow to note the silence in Lucie’s correspondence or memoirs as she took time to grieve, recuperate, and reemerge with gratitude for what was left: a good marriage, a loyal friend, a new home, however small or shared, and life itself. 

My ancestors’ personal histories offer similar perspectives. They make me feel wimpy with sagas of crossing oceans and western plains alongside parents and siblings dying. My parents’ journeys, too, entail childhoods in Great Depression small towns, young adult years during life upended by World War II, and child-rearing years that included receiving Vietnam War draft lottery numbers for my older brothers. But continually interspersing their losses is grace: the security of childhood homes, falling in love, getting a job, recovering from serious illness, and finding solace in religious observance and meaning in family obligations. 

Grace persists, too, even for us twenty-first-century wimps. An online semester, a campus job, and a gig at a grocery store replaced my son-in-law’s and two college kids’ lost internships. The teenager with the forfeited track season searched in vain for a summer job until his older siblings’ former employer texted that, with business picking up in June, he could use a part-time fry cook. Nothing glamorous, but they are grateful for the work. The re-routed missionary from Asia has been temporarily reassigned, along with a small horde of other uprooted missionaries, to Bakersfield, California. His new mission president has already reached out on Zoom to welcome his displaced flock. And I’ve added a new item on the family calendar that doesn’t look like it will get erased: return to church on June 28, 2020. 

The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.

 

About the author

Betsy VanDenBerghe

Betsy VanDenBerghe is a former editor for the Ensign. She has written for First Things, National Review, Washington Post, and Real Clear Politics. She is a graduate of Harvard's Radcliffe Publishing Course.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Church Vandalism

A spate of vandalism is targetting Catholic churches in the wake of the leaked opinion reversing Roe v. Wade.   https://kdvr.com/news/local/boulder-church-vandalized-for-2nd-time/   This occurs at a time when hate crimes on the basis of religion are on the rise across the country. And most of this violence seems to be based on a mistaken idea about what the actual impact of a Supreme Court Ruling in the Dobbs case would actually mean.    

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 3 Discussion and What’s True?

Summary – The episode opens with Detective Pyre leading a group of officers up the mountain to rescue Taba, who is completely fine and sitting on the ground outside one of the cabins. (The episode doesn’t explain how he got there after having a gun pointed at his face at the end of episode 2.) Pyre calls for more backup and finds a little girl wandering in the woods, lost and scared. The officers apprehend her and she tells Pyre about how things function up at the “fort” and about “Uncle Allen and Auntie Brenda” when her mother Sara arrives. Pyre questions Sara about Brenda’s experiences in the temple. The episode then depicts the beginning of an endowment session in a pretty good imitation of the garden room in the Salt Lake Temple. Brenda shares with her sisters-in-law her worries about making a covenant to “surrender” to her husband. One of the signs is shown as well as the penalty motion. Sara claims the end of the world is nigh, that her husband Sam’s job is to separate the wheat from the tares, and that Brenda was subject to the doctrine of blood atonement. A large squadron of police officers prepares to storm the Lafferty “fort,” when Pyre realizes that the situation resembles the Haun’s Mill Massacre and decides to instead approach unarmed. A wild-looking Sam and his family are taken into custody while one man escapes into the woods.  Meanwhile, Pyre’s mother with dementia is recovered after she wandered out during the twin’s birthday party. We see a flashback to Father Lafferty confronting Dan about refusing to pay taxes and beating him with his belt. The next day, Dan receives a “revelation” that he is the rightful leader of the family. In the present, Pyre and his wife take the girls to their baptismal interview with their bishop, and Pyre stays behind to discuss his mother’s health with the bishop. He also brings up how his current case ties into difficult church history topics, which the bishop encourages him to “put on a shelf.” At home later, Pyre and his wife fight about whether to postpone the girls’ baptism until after the case is closed.  At the police station, Sam Lafferty is ranting and raving. Pyre corners Allen about his criminal record due to unpaid parking tickets. He shares how his brothers pressured him into it, and as a result, he was arrested and missed Brenda’s graduation from BYU. Brenda’s anger about this led her to confront Dan about his beliefs (which involve a lot of strange reasoning about the constitution and separation of powers), and during the confrontation, Dan reveals his plan to run for sheriff and eventually pull down most government institutions from the inside. Allen ties this story to Brigham Young encouraging Joseph Smith to fight persecution, but Allen says he made a deal with Brenda that he would leave their influence if she gave up her career to start a family.  Pyre and Tab interrogate Sam Lafferty, who claims to be the Lord’s destroying angel, murdering those who are on his “holy list.” Robin Lafferty, still in custody, overhears Sam’s rants and demands to know if Brenda and her daughter are okay. Pyre shows him pictures of their deaths and Robin breaks, revealing that the Lafferty’s are likely also planning an attack on their bishop and stake president, who tried to stop their apostasy. Flashback to Brenda finding out she is pregnant and deciding to try to help the Lafferty family back onto the path of the mainstream church. Church History – This episode has a violent depiction of the Haun’s Mill Massacre, which most members will readily recognize. Less well known is the obscure early church concept of blood atonement, which the Lafferty’s appear to believe is still in force and to be enacted by them. Allen also pins violence in the early church on Brigham Young’s influence on Joseph Smith, with Emma Smith being against it. This neatly parallels the Lafferty situation, but it’s a significant simplification of the complex web of influences and responses to constant violence against the early Saints. We also get a mention of Joseph Smith running for president, which from my understanding he mostly did to draw attention to the plight of the church rather than expecting to win and reform the government. The show also alludes to the alleged assassination attempt on Governor Boggs by Porter Rockwell. Shibboleths – Sara Lafferty asks Pyre if he “follows his covenants.” This phrasing is off: LDS members would say “keep your covenants” or “honor your covenants.” (A search for the phrase “follow the covenants” on the church website yields only one result.) In the temple, Robin’s wife remarks on the importance of “keeping our agency strong,” another formulation that makes no sense. To Latter-day Saints, agency means the God-given ability to choose. This isn’t something we can strengthen, but an inherent condition of mortality. During their fight, Sister Pyre worries that delaying the baptism will shame her in front of their “congregation.” Members would never use this word, especially in private. We exclusively refer to our congregation as a “ward.” Her concern about people wondering if her daughters “failed” their interview seems off as well. Finally, let’s talk about LDS family size. Several times in this episode we get references to “at least 10” or “dozens” of kids as though this is the typical size of an LDS family. But in actuality, in 1980, only 12% of Utahns had a family of 6 people or more, and only a fraction of that 12% would have 10+ children. The wards I have lived in have maybe one family that has more than 5 kids. It’s just not that typical. I Don’t Love to See the Temple – Alright, here we are at the biggest controversy of the series: the decision to portray sacred temple ordinances. The temple scene takes place from timestamp 14:00 to 17:00. Only three minutes long, yet

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This