Therapy session with religious symbols in the background.

Can Therapy Be Faith-Friendly? Why Bringing Jesus into Counseling Might Not Meet Your Spiritual Needs

How can therapy honor faith? Effective therapy respects religious values, offering a complete path to mental wellness.

In the United States, graduate programs that teach students how to be therapists stress the importance of “broaching” diverse and cultural contexts of a client’s life. The underlying idea is that many people might feel it is difficult to approach certain aspects of their experiences with their counselor. Topics that are typically considered important to broach include affectional orientation, gender orientation, socioeconomic status, ability status, race, and spirituality or religion. 

In not bringing these aspects of their experience into session, it is thought that the individual is only conveying ‘parts’ to the counselor instead of the ‘whole,’ which, in turn, can negatively affect the therapeutic process. Often when the therapist brings attention to a certain cultural aspect, the individual can open up and can feel “this is okay to talk about.” That is why a counselor is encouraged to broach. It is said that: 

A therapist who is broaching is aware of cross-cultural similarities and differences and the workings of power in the therapy dyad and makes deliberate efforts to demonstrate this understanding to the client, which includes explicit discussion in sessions [emphasis added].

My particular university was very focused on developing culturally competent counselors. Most of my classes emphasized the importance of incorporating the client’s experience in developing positive rapport and facilitating good therapeutic treatment. The mantra I heard throughout my counseling education is, “If you are not culturally competent, you should not be a counselor.” 

However, mainstream therapeutic practice has often come up short when it comes to broaching one particular part of culture and identity: religion. Religion is a huge part of many people’s lives, and many clients want their beliefs to be understood and respected within a therapeutic space. This is actually a reasonable expectation.

I can pinpoint the moment the attitudes around mental health began to shift.

While it is true that not all places are perfect in approaching religion and spirituality, organizations like ASERVIC, the Association for Spiritual, Ethical, and Religious Values in Counseling, are promoting education on appropriate religious and spiritual competencies. These competencies include:

1. Understanding basic belief systems, major world religions, agnosticism, and atheism.

2. Recognizing that the client’s beliefs (or absence of beliefs) are central to their worldview and have influence over their psychological well-being. 

3. Knowing your own limitations as a clinician in understanding a client’s religion and spiritual experience. 

4. Recognizing and using spiritual or religious concepts consistent with the client’s worldview or perspective. 

5. Understanding religious themes and contexts and addressing these when therapeutically relevant and counseling with reliable religious resources when necessary. 

Living and working as a therapist in Utah, I can say that these spiritual and religious competencies matter, even beyond the Latter-day Saint population. 

Why Broaching Matters For You

Now you may be wondering why I feel the need to educate you on broaching. Fair question. 

It is because these competencies are important to you as a religious individual who may potentially engage in therapy. Therapists should be competent in exploring religion within therapeutic settings. In fact, it is an expectation. And you should feel like you can bring Jesus into therapy with you in a meaningful way. In fact, as members of the Church of Jesus Christ, we are encouraged to do so. 

I can pinpoint the moment the attitudes around mental health began to shift more within the Latter-day Saint community. In 2013, Elder Holland gave his conference talk, Like a Broken Vessel, and it had a rippling effect on how we saw and continue to see mental health experiences. In this impactful talk, he stated

… these afflictions are some of the realities of mortal life, and there should be no more shame in acknowledging them than in acknowledging a battle with high blood pressure or the sudden appearance of a malignant tumor. 

In contrast to much of the casual, misinformed dialogue around mental health experiences back in 2013, Elder Holland even encouraged us to seek out professional help for these types of struggles and difficulties. He refuted the ideas from previous years and decades, which painted struggling individuals as lazy, broken, or entitled. Elder Holland expressed hope and advice later in his talk: 

If things continue to be debilitating, seek the advice of reputable people with certified training, professional skills, and good values. Be honest with them about your history and your struggles.

As a therapist and as someone who has engaged in their own therapy, I can attest to the positive benefits that can come from seeking that kind of help. Certainly, we can recognize the divine inspiration that Elder Holland received, which led many people to get the help they needed when they might have otherwise hesitated.

However, psychology and therapy are generally secular disciplines, and sometimes professionals do not always understand or appreciate different values in their clients, even if they may think they do. In the ASERVIC guidelines addressed earlier in this article, professionals are encouraged to know their limitations and to be aware of their own biases. Indeed, if professionals and individuals seeking services are not cognizant of the reality of bias in therapy, it can lead to recommendations that are not aligned with clients’ values. Sometimes, individuals may feel that they need to do what their therapist recommends, even if it is against their values, in order to get better.

Indeed, among many examples, I once heard an account of a client who was encouraged to have a trial “open relationship” to help their monogamous relationship. Additionally, someone else I knew was encouraged to view their pornography use as a productive coping skill even when they personally wanted to stop watching it due to their religious values. These are certainly not the only ways in which values can be disregarded or misunderstood.

In this spirit we can look at the next line in Elder Holland’s talk that may be easy to overlook. He said

Prayerfully and responsibly consider the counsel they give and the solutions they prescribe [emphasis added].

We have not been encouraged to listen to counselors, therapists, psychiatrists, or psychologists without critically thinking about the treatments and skills they prescribe. Indeed, we have been encouraged to bring God into the process and study it out in our own minds. To do that, it may be beneficial to find a therapist who is willing and capable of talking about God and who will allow you to bring Jesus to therapy. It can feel like two separate experiences, but it does not have to be. 

If you find a good therapist, though, this does not always mean that you will be on the same page or that you will not need to talk about differences in perspectives. There were several times in my own therapeutic experience when my therapist and I talked about how my beliefs were misunderstood and misinterpreted, but they were willing and able to meet me there. That is the important thing.

It can feel like two separate experiences, but it does not have to be.

Finding a space where you can bring Jesus to therapy can feel like a daunting task. Therapists are not clergy, and certainly, you don’t want them to act like your bishop. Nor do you want anyone who is going to preach to you about how not reading your scriptures in the right way is the reason that you are depressed. Unfortunately, I have heard such encounters from clients about well-intentioned Latter-day Saint therapists.

Ultimately, though, I want to empower individuals to bring their values, their religion, and their beliefs into therapy. As members of the Church of Jesus Christ, we fundamentally believe that all change is wrought through the Atonement of Jesus Christ. We are taught that “it is only in and through the Grace of God that ye are saved” and “without a Savior to redeem and reform us, there is little hope of lasting improvement in humanity.” He provides us with ways to help us heal and to bring us closer to Him. Therapy can be an avenue to do that if we find the right therapist and we approach it with the right intent. 

Healing with Jesus and healing in therapy do not have to be two separate entities. You do not need to keep your beliefs, your values, and your religions apart from your experience in therapy. You have the right to bring these values and find a professional who can navigate that terrain with you.

About the author

Brianna Holmes

Brianna Holmes graduated with a degree in Marriage, Couples, and Family Counseling and is currently a practicing counselor in Utah. Her area of interest is how professionals can focus on the agentic nature of human beings in therapeutic practices. She and her husband are parents to four beautiful children.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Side Profile of a Young Boy's Face | How the Feeling of Peace Impacts You | Finding True Peace

Are You Feeling Peace or Just Relief?

So many stepping away from families, marriages, and faith attest to poignant emotional validation for their life-changing decisions. What exactly is this emotion they are feeling?

Abuse is Something We Should Be Able to Fight Together

Few issues hold as much universal importance as child abuse. What does it mean when we’re not only unable to come together to confront this, but also seem increasingly eager to insist that others care less about fighting this than we do?

Rainbow Colored Heart & Red Broken Heart | Coming Out & Walking Away. Why? | Public Square Magazine | Stacey Harkey Gay | Studio C Gay | Stacey Studio C

Coming Out & Walking Away. Why?

You’ve probably only ever heard one answer for why so many LGBT+ identifying brothers and sisters are walking away. But the full truth is rarely so popular—or so simple.

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven: Episode 4, “Church and State”

Summary — The episode begins with the detectives checking in on Bishop Low’s home, which they find ransacked and deserted. Pyre finds a letter written by Ron’s wife to the Prophet expressing concern about her husband’s refusal to pay taxes. The detective contacts the Church about the letter and is told the letter was handed down to one of the bishop’s counselors, LeConte Bascom, who works at the bank. Brother Bascom says he had to turn Ron down for a loan because his brother’s refusal to pay taxes made him a liability, though it’s heavily implied that the real reason is that his wife’s letter was seen as an embarrassment to the Church. In flashbacks, we see Dan marching in a Pioneer Day parade, shouting about the government’s illegal taxes, as well as smoking and kissing a woman who isn’t his wife. Dan’s father says he’s ashamed of his immoral behavior and anti-tax nonsense and advises him to study the scriptures to set himself back on the right path. This unfortunately drives Dan into researching more obscure history of the Church, including information on polygamy.  He makes a business trip down to Colorado City to visit the breakaway polygamist sect there and manages to get the name of a pro-polygamy pamphlet called “The Peace Maker.” He reads this pamphlet and brings up the idea to his wife Matilda, telling her she’s limiting his spiritual power if she doesn’t let him marry a second wife.  During this conversation, Dan is pulled over for speeding and refuses to cooperate with the officer, leading them on a police chase that ends with his arrest. At the jail, Dan’s brothers try to convince him to stop his resistance to the government. Ron feels it’s his responsibility to show Dan the error of his ways, but instead, Dan runs circles around him, leaving him speechless and admitting that he’s going to lose his business and home. Dan somehow turns this fact into evidence that his views are correct and ends up winning over Ron to his side. In the present, Detective Pyre is being leaned on by the Laffertys’ stake president to release them into his custody but refuses. The detectives have identified the car the killers were probably using and plan to hold a press conference to ask for tips when the police chief returns from vacation and demands that all mentions of fundamentalism Mormonism be scrubbed from the press briefing. (It’s implied he’s being leaned on by the Church.) Pyre tries to toe the line at the conference but eventually caves to a persistent reporter and admits that he thinks that the murders may have something to do with fundamentalist beliefs. The next day at church, the ward is shunning the Pyres, and a specific couple is assigned to keep an eye on their faith. Meanwhile, a police officer has located Bishop Low fly fishing in the mountains and safe. Church History — During Dan’s explanation of polygamy, we get flashbacks to the infamous scene where Emma finds out about the doctrine of polygamy for the first time and throws the revelation in the fire. Though church members will be familiar with this story, the tone is portrayed very differently than we are used to. Emma is shown as being absolutely skeptical of Joseph’s translation of the Book of Mormon and other prophetic acts, even though she firmly testified of the truth of these things even after her break with the Church after Joseph was murdered. Joseph is portrayed as proclaiming the doctrine of polygamy only for his own physical gratification, which is a common anti-Mormon trope with little evidence behind it. While it is true that one of Joseph’s wives was only 14, the facts behind the situation are more complex than portrayed in the show. The pamphlet “The Peace Maker” is portrayed by Dan Lafferty as an “essential LDS tract” written by Joseph Smith, and no one in the show ever corrects this perception. In fact, the tract was not written by Joseph Smith, and he repudiated it during his lifetime. This episode presents a slanted view of church history, giving only one side of the conversation and showing the modern church as trying to hush it up rather than having its own interpretation of events. Shibboleths — Pyre claims that writing a letter to the prophet is like writing to “Heavenly Father himself,” which is absolutely wrong. While members of the Church do revere the prophet and listen to his teachings, he is not God, and this equivalency is not one Saints would make (though outsiders think we do). The idea that doing business with fundamentalists is like “doing business with the mafia” is totally alien to me. They are regarded as somewhat of an oddity in Utah, but not dangerous like organized crime. One unusual phrase occurs when the stake president claims that the Laffertys need to be released into his custody for “healing prayer.” I honestly have no idea what this phrase refers to and have never heard it in an LDS context. And the formal type of shunning portrayed happening to the Pyres is not something we do. Though obviously, wards vary in their culture, there is no formal instruction not to talk to those who have questions. Rather, we are encouraged to keep being friends with those who are struggling with faith and support them however we can. Changing History — It is interesting to note that in the actual chain of events, it was Sister Low, not Bishop Low, who was on the Lafferty hit list. Sister Low was a Relief Society President who supported Dan’s wife as she sought a divorce. Why does the show change this? Perhaps the idea that the Church has female leaders doesn’t fit well with the show’s depiction of the oppression of women in the LDS church. Brenda Lafferty’s sister has also expressed her disappointment with the way the show is misconstruing her sister’s murder in pursuit of an

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!