A figure clutches a cup in a dark grove, evoking Christ’s suffering and the question of Why God Allows Suffering.

Drinking the Bitter Cup: ​​Finding Purpose in What Hurts Most

Pain can be spiritually and existentially productive—it wakes us up, calls us deeper, and invites us toward transformation.

Whatever else one might say about the love of God, it apparently does not demand the immediate end of suffering. Suffering is ubiquitous. Much of it seems pointless or unnecessary; much of it seems unfair. As we read in Job, “Man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward” (5:7). 

Some believers try to “save” God from the embarrassment of having created a world with so much suffering by downplaying the suffering that plainly exists.  But this won’t do. Denying the depth of suffering is a way of looking away from the world God created. The pain of the world can’t be banished just by averting our eyes. Suffering persists, and sooner or later, just about everyone will face suffering that will not be silenced or ignored.

Suffering disrupts our comfortable routines and shallow certainties.

Jesus, of course, knows suffering better than anyone. He was “a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief … he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows” (Isaiah 53:3-4). Alma teaches that Jesus would “go forth, suffering pains and afflictions and temptations of every kind; and this that the word might be fulfilled which saith he will take upon him the pains and the sicknesses of his people” (Alma 7:11).

Is all this human and divine suffering really necessary? There may not be a satisfactory answer to this question in this life. But it is possible to hazard a few guesses about why God might permit suffering to persist. 

In what follows, I am not making the case “for suffering.” I’m not suggesting that we should “like” suffering or that we should seek it out. I’m also not saying that suffering always has an upside. I am suggesting that suffering can play an important role in our path towards God, and if it does, then our personal Via Dolorosa will not have been in vain. 

One way that suffering can help us turn towards God is by humbling us and disabusing us of false beliefs. Suffering disrupts our comfortable routines and shallow certainties. In the depths of pain, we are forced to take a hard look at our lives to see what we are missing. We often find that we are not as virtuous, kind, faithful, or courageous as we thought we were. We find that we were going through the motions rather than loving God with all our heart, might, mind, and strength. God tries to speak to us in many ways, but when we are “past feeling” (1 Nephi 17:45), when we ignore the simple and profound ways that God tries to teach us, God is willing to use other means to get our attention. As C.S. Lewis says, pain is God’s “megaphone to rouse a deaf world.” In this space, there is an opening for us to turn towards God. 

Pain forces us to look beyond the mundane and the trivial. In times of ease and comfort, it is easier for us to be bewitched by fleeting pleasures. But when true difficulty comes, we are drawn to look for what Blaise Pascal calls “a firmer way out.” In these circumstances, challenges and suffering are a gift from God to disburden us from false attachments. As one bible commentator writes, “And should we not consider all crosses, all things grievous to flesh and blood, as what they really are, as opportunities of embracing God’s will, at the expense of our own? And consequently, as so many steps by which we may advance in holiness?”

Apparently, part of the price of having joy is knowing misery.

Paradoxically, suffering makes joy possible. In the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve lived a pleasant and idyllic existence, but it was ultimately joyless. As we read in 2 Nephi 2:23, if Adam and Eve had not eaten the forbidden fruit, “they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin” (emphasis added). This is one more area of life where there “must needs be … an opposition in all things” (2 Nephi 2:11). As LDS convert and scholar Arthur Henry King says, “You can’t have resurrection on Sunday without having crucifixion on Friday.” 

Pointing out that suffering is a precondition for joy might lead some readers to seek out suffering for its own sake, but this is not necessary. Like old age, suffering will find us whether we look for it or not. Further, the quest for righteous living will necessarily require us to face numerous difficult challenges. Jesus’ invitation to follow Him is upfront about the costs of discipleship: “If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me” (Matt. 16:24, emphasis added). Loving fallen human beings is its own source of sorrow, as the example of our Heavenly Father shows (Moses 7:28-33). Apparently, part of the price of having joy is knowing misery. Paul As Bruce C. and Marie K. Hafen write, “The sorrows of our lives [can] carve and stretch … caverns … that] expand the soul’s capacity for joy.” Paul gloried in the tribulations that helped him know Christ better: “Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ’s sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong” (2 Corinthians 12:10). 

Another way that suffering can work to our benefit is by making us deeper people. I don’t mean deeper in the sense of being intellectually deeper (though it may also include that), but existentially deeper. Through suffering, we become aware of the broader scope of possibilities of human existence. 

We humans are generally creatures of comfort. We avoid or ignore the terrors that lurk just beyond a functional horizon of consciousness. Though we are dimly aware of just how bad things can get—especially when a friend or family member falls prey to some great injury or misfortune—we often suppress and downplay these possibilities, flattering ourselves that such things probably won’t happen to us. But then catastrophe arrives at our door, and we descend into the underbelly of pain and suffering that shatters whatever sense of normalcy we once had. 

Down here, it’s deeply uncomfortable. No one wants to stay. But there is a sense in which we are more acquainted with reality here than when we are comfortable. Dross cannot endure the refiner’s fire. Jesus taught, “Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up” (Matthew 15:13). Here we gain perspective on what matters most. 

And, crucially, here we can find other people in a way that we cannot find them anywhere else. Everyone feels pain, and everyone wants their pain to matter. There is something deeply validating about having someone empathize with your pain, to feel it with you as you feel it yourself. When we pass through deep valleys of pain and suffering, we become capable of descending into those same valleys with other people, helping them face the terrors that seem overwhelming. According to Alma, part of the reason Jesus suffered all that He did was so that “his bowels may be filled with mercy, according to the flesh, that he may know according to the flesh how to succor his people according to their infirmities” (Alma 7:12). You never forget a friend who arrives and supports you in a moment of extremity.

Everyone feels pain, and everyone wants their pain to matter.

Jesus’ suffering seems to be in a category of its own, both for its depth and intensity as well as its redeeming effects. But too often we mistake “Christ’s transfiguration of all suffering for an elimination of all suffering.” As we suffer in Christ’s service, we come closer to Him. Paul teaches that “The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together (Romans 8:16-17, emphasis added). 

When we tell the story of Easter, we rightly focus on the resurrection of Christ and the empty tomb, for joy and redemption have the last word. But that joy wouldn’t be what it is without the terrible price Jesus paid to achieve it. As Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf recently taught, “We tend to think of joy as the absence of sorrow … But what if joy and sorrow can coexist? What if they have to coexist?” Suffering prepares us for the joy Jesus won at such a high cost.

About the author

Daniel Frost

Daniel Frost is the Director of Public Scholarship in the School of Family Life at Brigham Young University and Editor-in-Chief of Public Square Magazine. He has a Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Christmas Renovation

So much anger. So much despair. So much fear. Could this Christmas be a time to clear the air of some of that in our own relationships, neighborhoods, and homes?

Black & White Photo of Jewish Family at Dinner | Sacred Experiences w/ Jewish Friends | Public Square Magazine | Do Jews Have Godparents | What to Say to Jewish Friends

Sacred Experiences with Jewish Friends

At a time of rising antisemitism, it can be especially helpful to reflect on ways in which a Latter-day Saint perspective invites robust solidarity and rich connection with Jewish friends.

Sean Astin & Ke Huy Quan Reunite, But “Love Hurts” Doesn’t Deliver

My son asked me what “Love Hurts” was about. I told him it was about how we can’t just move on from our past. “Oh,” he looked concerned, “That’s a bad movie.” Unlike my son concluded, “Love Hurts” isn’t a bad movie, but it’s not a Christian one. The theme repeated over and over is that we cannot move on from the past until we conquer it. Our main character desperately works for redemption, but the film keeps telling him he can’t have it. His aw-shucks charm in “Everything Everywhere All at Once,” combined with the nostalgia for his 80s career has combined to make Ke Huy Quan Hollywood’s “it” man of the moment. And “Love Hurts” is the star vehicle to determine if he can top the marquee of a nationwide opening.  It’s a bit of a mixed bag. The film is set over a Valentine’s Day weekend. Quan, plays Marvin Gable the regional realtor of the year. His upbeat attitude endears him to his clients and coworkers alike. Marvin used to be the enforcer for the local mob run by his brother. His brother ordered him to take out Rose, his unrequited crush, for stealing. But Marvin let her live and started a new life. Rose has decided to come back, delivering Valentine’s to the major players, dragging Marvin back into the life he tried to leave behind. The film, which runs a brisk 85 minutes, is mostly a series of choreographed fight scenes interspersed with just enough exposition to explain the plot and three love stories. So it’s worth mentioning that the fight choreography is very focused on creating tableaus showing off the imagination of the designer. And this does work to create some eye-popping visuals.  But I’m not sure if the trade-off to get those moments was worth it. To get to the visual moments it wants to show off the fights vacillate wildly between grounded brutal realism and physics so implausible it would make the Avengers blush, with no real explanation or meaning between the two. The pacing of the fights was often awkward and halting. And I never felt any stakes in the scenes because I never knew how much risk my protagonists were in.  The film uses a series of intermittent voice-overs from both Marvin and Rose to explain their attraction to one another. But the chemistry between the two never takes off. And while the film explains why Rose would be attracted to Marvin’s kindness and power, we never figure out why Marvin was willing to throw his entire life away twice at an outside chance with a woman who isn’t that interested in him.  The two grunts in the film played by André Eriksen and Marshawn Lynch, spend the time between their fights figuring out how to write a text to repair one of their marriages. The most amusing romance is between Raven, who breaks into Marvin’s office to fight him, and Ashley, the real estate assistant who finds his unconscious body and falls in love with him while reading his poetry in his notebook before he wakes up.  The movie is surprisingly funny. It leans into the cliches of the Asian mob film, and then juxtaposes it next to a bunch of odd things: suburban model homes, an all-American black belt, a poet, a pull-over sweater. It’s mostly just the one joke, but it’s enough for the film’s brisk run. My favorite part of the film was Sean Astin. Astin plays Marvin’s boss, and older brother figure who gave him the job when he escaped the mob. Astin and Quan famously shared the screen in “Goonies.” During the scene early in the film when Astin gives Quan the real estate award, you could feel the dialogue transcend the characters. It felt like Astin was so proud of the success of his old friend Quan, and this was his moment to tell him.  Quan, for his part, does everything right but doesn’t take the material to another level.  If you love fight choreography, there will certainly be some interesting things to look at here. And if you want a classic action romp with a few laughs and a Valentine’s twist this might be the film for you. But for most people, I don’t think it all comes together. It’s too gory without meaning. And while the movie seems to think it has a happy ending, I can’t imagine that most of the people watching will agree. It’s got R-rated content with no compensating uplift to make it worth the experience. Two out of five stars. “Love Hurts” opens nationwide on February 7, 2025.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This