Soul-Pixar-scaled (1)

Soul and pre-existence in pop culture

While the afterlife is often seen in pop culture, the premortality is seen much less. Why? And why does the subject remain so irresistible to artists?

Spoiler Alert: This article discusses plot details of the Pixar film “Soul” in great detail.

When a self-centered character discovers a world of not-yet-born children, they see that before birth we gain purpose and personality. Not all of the not-yet-born children are anxious to come to earth, but as they find purpose in learning, our character discovers a more meaningful approach to life as well.

The summary will likely sound familiar to those who caught the Christmas release of Pixar’s newest film “Soul.” But it could just as easily describe the final vignette in the 1940 film “The Blue Bird.” 

“The Blue Bird” was Twentieth Century Fox’s attempt at recreating the surreal magic of the “Wizard of Oz.” Shirley Temple plays the ill-mannered Mytlyl who encounters a pre-mortal existence.

The after-life has been the frequent subject of the cinematic treatment. From the suburban “Defending your life” to the surrealist “What Dreams May Come” and more recently to the bureaucratic visions brought to television in “The Good Place” and “Miracle Workers” our cultural vision of the afterlife is vast and vibrant.

This stands in contrast to the eighty years between “The Blue Bird” and “Soul” with a substantially similar vision. And exempting the Latter-day Saint specific “Saturday’s Warrior” and an assembly line pre-title credit of “Boss Baby” just about comprises the entirety of cinematic takes on the pre-Earth life. 

For interfaith scholars this relative lack of depiction of premortality comes as little surprise. Terryl Givens, the author of “When Souls Had Wings”—perhaps the definitive take on the pre-earth life in Western Culture—explained that around the 6th century, premortality “was in conflict with the increasingly orthodox doctrine of creation ex nihilo. The idea of a God who summoned all of existence into being with a word.”

The many Christian faiths that came to dominate Western Culture relied on a series of ecumenical councils in the middle ages. One of these, the Second Council of Constantinople, “anathematized” the idea of premortality—essentially declaring it heretical. 

This is why among contemporary Christians, premortality is a largely unique doctrine of Latter-day Saints. 

But while the doctrine of premortality may have been off-limits to many, the idea proved impossible to quelch. 

Neal Silvester, the author of “The Hero Doctrine” believes that the ideas of the plan of salvation ring so true to the human soul that they express themselves across much of our great art. This pattern is called “The hero’s journey.” Silvester explains, “broadly speaking, pre-earth life in the hero’s journey would be at the first step known as the ‘Call to Adventure.’ This is where the hero learns of the mission he or she is being asked to complete.” 

You can recognize this step in the hero’s journey from Luke Skywalker choosing to leave Tatooine to Frodo choosing to leave the Shire. These stories do not include a literal location of premortality, but the idea echoes in its structure.

And while less common, even explicit references to premortality continued to appear. Givens explains, “Those intimations that have proven themselves irrepressible find easier access into the public sphere. Hence we find numerous poets and artists from Michelangelo to the Romantics to Robert Frost who freely and unashamedly represent premortal souls and realms.”

Into what paradoxicallys stands as both a void and tradition comes Pixar’s newest film, “Soul.”

“Soul” follows two principle protagonists. Joe, a jazz pianist and middle school band teacher, and twenty-two a not-yet-born spirit who has been resisting going to Earth.

After Joe dies in an accident, he escapes following the white light and lands in what the film calls “The Great Before.” Here Joe hopes to steal a pass back to Earth where he can return to his body so he can take advantage of his big break playing a gig with a well-respected jazz quartet.

Joe is mistaken for a mentor and is assigned to twenty-two. In “Soul’s” take on premortality, spirits are given a number when they are created, develop personalities, and “sparks” and then proceed to Earth. The role of the mentor is to help the spirit discover their spark which will give them their Earth pass and allow them to be born.

Twenty-two sees Earth as a place for pain and has long-managed to avoid it.

By seeing Joe’s desire to return to his life, twenty-two recognizes the good of living, and through twenty-two’s fresh eyes, Joe recognizes the meaning in the everyday.

Katherine Nelson, a Latter-day Saint and self-described Disney super-fan explained, “I was so excited to see Soul! The idea of a premortal existence is so rarely depicted in pop culture. [The film] reaffirmed to me that the trials we go through in life are so relatively small when compared with the eternity of our existence.”

Nelson gets at the core of why the idea of premortality remains so trenchant. Givens explained, “Premortality continues to fascinate because it answers a multitude of perplexities that conventional Christianity cannot. … The largest benefit [of this belief] is in grounding a healthy alternative to posting our existence as purely accidental.”

By giving Joe the perspective of a pre-Earth life, “Soul” demonstrates how the belief in premortality produces the grounding and joy that Latter-day Saints are so familiar with. And explains why the idea has remained so irresistible to artists.

Nelson said, “I have so many friends that I have made through the Disney community and throughout our discussions of “Soul,” I’ve had the great chance to share our faith benefits from believing that our souls existed before birth.” 

Perhaps “Soul” will prove to be a bridge for the idea of premortality into our popular culture. 

About the author

C.D. Cunningham

C.D. Cunningham is a founder and editor-at-large of Public Square magazine.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Mother Figurine Holding a Baby | Public Square Magazine | Meaning of the Lyrics Peace on Earth, Goodwill to Men

Now is the Time for Peace on Earth, Goodwill to Men

You’ve heard it before: “Peace on earth, goodwill to men.” Whether viewed as prophecy for a hopeful future, as rebuke to a fallen world, or as the deep aspiration of many human hearts, these words invoke wonder still today, especially at a time like 2020. I believe these words point towards legitimate reasons for great hope in humanity’s future, even in the midst of our current distress. A closer look at their meaning provides a glimpse into bright possibilities. The modern-day enshrinement of these words was penned by the hand of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow during a time of deep personal sadness and grief in his 1863 poem “Christmas Bells.” Subsequently, these words have been sung by millions as the hymn “I Heard The Bells On Christmas Day.” Sadly, few choirs will sing this popular carol during the Christmas season this year as many of our most cherished traditions are disrupted by the continuing, unprecedented epidemic.  Notwithstanding the familiarity of these words in the modern context, their first recorded rendering came anciently in a most unusual setting. It was one of the few instances in all of secular or religious writings where an entire host of heavenly beings—angels—came to deliver a message to a few lucky ones on earth. Their entire message as recorded in Luke 2:14 of the New Testament was “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” If there was more to the message or not, we don’t know. But this was the message that was recorded and handed down over thousands of years since that momentous event.  It was this short heavenly song of praise that Longfellow was referring to when he lamented that “hate is strong and mocks the song of peace on earth goodwill to men.” Then as now, we join Longfellow in observing a world stricken with contention, tragic death, and human suffering with no clear end in sight. As a bold counterpoint, however, his poem and the hymn conclude with a resounding proclamation of hope that indeed there will be yet “peace on earth and goodwill to men.” Is it possible to find for ourselves this same hope of which Longfellow wrote so long ago?    Some might assume that the author had somehow arrived at more pleasant circumstances and material conditions. Yet in describing his world that Christmas morning in 1863, Longfellow was feeling the weight of personal tragedy in the death of his wife and the strife of a hot civil war spreading devastating carnage across the land. In such a heavy time, he couldn’t help but underscore how much the surrounding hate he saw in the world seemed to mock the idea of peace and goodwill – a word that suggests to “tease or laugh at in a scornful or contemptuous manner.” The hate he was referring to, and which has the power to infect us in our own day, was between groups of people and between individuals who looked at each other with scorn and contempt. In an environment that fosters hate, any suggestion that feelings of scorn and contempt might be replaced with feelings of peace and goodwill can seem to be almost laughable (another reason it’s powerful to have a heavenly host delivering this message to the world).   We sometimes think of peace and goodwill as synonyms. They are not. In fact, they represent very different human conditions – either one by itself being incomplete. But together they weave a social fabric of heavenly dimensions. There are many examples of one without the other, but relatively few of both existing and being sustained for any great length of time.  In its simplest form, peace could be defined as the absence of conflict. When this kind of peace is voluntary, due to an underlying feeling of goodwill toward all, it is a wonderfully satisfying human condition.  However, a “peaceful” absence of conflict can also be achieved through coercion, even in the notable absence of goodwill. In that case, it comes at the obvious, and dear price of freedom and liberty and represents a most cruel form of the human condition. Coerced peace is usually a political construct as it requires overwhelming use of force to constrain human behaviors. There have been modern examples of peace without goodwill in the recent past. One can reflect on Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, and other nations. For example, Yugoslavia was created after World War II as a federation of six different ethnic regions. A strong central governing party ensured that conflicts were resolved emphatically and quickly. There was “peace,” but without the underlying goodwill among the different ethnic groups. Under Josip Broz Tito the country experienced an extended period of prosperity characterized by enforced peaceful interaction among the various ethnic groups. In many ways, it was considered a model of economic success.  But after Tito died in 1980, the ability to continue the peaceful climate through coercive means declined, and the unresolved conflicts among the different ethnic groups emerged with frightening consequences in human suffering for the whole country and region. In a relatively few years, the region completely lost both its peace and prosperity.  Similar events have unfolded in other countries where peace was enforced despite the absence of “goodwill toward men.” As the power to enforce coercive peace diminishes, people are subsequently often subjected to tragic suffering that can take decades and even generations to overcome to a point of regaining a semblance of stability. In short, peace without goodwill has a terrible historical record for producing great human suffering in the end.  Unlike “peaceful” conflict suppression, goodwill to men cannot be coerced. It is almost by definition an innate feeling of each individual human heart. It can be contagious, and it often seems to be either in large supply or in short supply in a particular family, community, or nation. It would seem that goodwill to other human beings is something that would be a universal good. However, once again we find that

A reflection of royal attire symbolizes the struggle between narcissism and faith in understanding self-worth.

Book Club: Are We Special?

This book explores the concept of feeling special as both a divine truth and a false sense of superiority over others.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!