pexels-photo-374703

Degrading Music is Everywhere. Let’s Enjoy Something Better

Music is incredibly powerful affecting everything from our mood to our sexual behavior. But while much music today degrades, we can choose something better.

Louis Armstrong himself once said, “Music is life itself.” 

Medical science suggests that in some ways, Armstrong may be right. The work of Audiologist Michele Clements, for example, has shown that different kinds of music produce different heartbeats and kicking patterns in unborn children. And the effects appear to persist outside the womb as well. 

Studies have linked our music choices to everything from illness to how we spend; from cooperation to what we can literally see. It’s perhaps no surprise then that music plays a role in some of humanity’s most spiritually significant rituals. And yet, when it comes to efforts that seek to curb corrosive forms of music, there’s often a reluctance to acknowledge just how potent a force music can be in our lives. 

Such concerns, of course, are not new. In Plato’s Republic, the noted Greek philosopher seems to imply that the properly ordered state would, of necessity, moderate music and poetry for the youth: “Gracelessness and evil rhythm and disharmony are akin to evil speaking and the evil temper.” For the state to lift its citizenry toward virtue, music and art must be oriented toward the good in Plato’s mind. 

Meanwhile, the great Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy similarly gave voice to the need to mindfully regulate the music we consume. He wrote in The Kreutzer Sonata: In China music is under the control of the State, and that is the way it ought to be. Is it admissible that the first comer should hypnotize one or more persons, and then do with them as he likes? And especially that the hypnotizer should be the first immoral individual who happens to come along? [Music is] a frightful power in the hands of any one, no matter whom.” 

Few today would say that music should be a matter for the state to control. But while many would be quick to dismiss any concerns about music as finger-wagging (“Oh, they used to complain about my Beatles records, too!”), it’s not just the Beatles we’re talking about anymore. And given the intensity and pervasiveness of music today, it’s worth considering the manner in which individuals, families, and culture can better self-censor and encourage higher, loftier forms of song and composition. 

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints publishes its For the Strength of Youth guidelines aimed to young people. From as far back as 1965, the booklet has included the instruction to “always review” music. Today, an updated version reads: “Do not attend, view, or participate in anything that is vulgar, immoral, violent, or pornographic in any way. Do not participate in anything that presents immorality or violence as acceptable. Have the courage to walk out of a movie, change your music, or turn off a computer, television, or mobile device if what you see or hear drives away the Spirit.”

Without question, listeners bear the primary responsibility for the music they consume. But, as the music industry and digital media now provide listeners with much of the music available to purchase, download, or stream, it’s not unreasonable to believe they should also bear some responsibility for the songs youth and adults encounter. 

Let’s speak plainly: after decades of growing sexualization generally in our culture, we continue to witness an even greater increase in hyper-sexualized content quickly accessible even to young people. Have these trends had any measurable effects?     

Some 78% of college students today report “hooking up.” And while casual sexual encounters have remained stable or gone down over the last thirty years, those encounters are increasingly with friends and barely-met strangers, and less and less with a spouse. Not only do more than 7 in 10 people regret their hookup, but one cannot help but wonder whether hookups may also be contributing to increasingly severe and widespread mental distress within pockets of the rising generation. 

“Music can be used to exalt and inspire or to carry messages of degradation and destruction.”

If music has set the stage for any of this, can a different kind of music also help change this? If music seems to influence shopping habits, perhaps it can help shape the kind of culture we aspire to curate. A study published in the journal Sexuality & Culture analyzed the songs from the Billboard top 100 for forty-eight years starting in the 1960s. 

The trend over time can be pretty well summed up in the shift from the Beatles’ “I want to hold your hand” to Akon’s “I want to *expletive* you.”  The report points out that over the time frame, male pop performers became especially more sexually explicit, referencing sex in 40% of pop songs in the 2000s. 

Counterintuitively, but perhaps to hammer home the point, songs about romantic relationships dropped during the same period. At the Latter-day Saint Publishing & Media Association (LDSPMA) Conference in 2018, David Archuleta spoke about his experience recording the music video for his single “Something ‘Bout Love” for his follow up album after his American Idol success. While he wanted to cultivate a sweet innocent brand in-line with his first single “Crush,” the music video producers ignored his wishes and provided costumes and a set that Archuleta described as “sexualized.”

When he tried to push back, he was met with high-pressure guilting tactics from the producers. And while he eventually got his way, Archuleta describes it as being a major factor in his breakup with his record label.

As if to invoke Tolstoy, one Latter-day Saint religious leader said, “Music is one of the most forceful instruments for governing the mind and the spirit of man.” And yet another delivered a similar message: “Music can be used to exalt and inspire or to carry messages of degradation and destruction.” 

Unlike Archuleta, many good, well-intentioned music artists nevertheless have accepted the idea that in order to sell their music or to gain popularity, their music has to contain violence, profanity, or pornography. Sadly, this idea has infected even some “Christian” music artists who have often decided to relax their moral standards in the well-worn Faustian bargain for fame or fortune. 

Music is the universal language. During the darkest nights, in times of adversity and distress, music can soothe the aching soul and bring the calmness and peace that a person yearns for. During moments of quietness and reflection, music speaks to our souls, and at times brings to remembrance things of life that may have long since been forgotten. Music expresses our jubilation, praise, and thanksgiving to God from whom all blessings flow. Do we live up to the lofty Latter-day Saint article of faith, which declares, “If there is anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.” 

Knowing the immense power of music, why would we seek for anything less?

About the author

Keith Brown

Keith Brown manages LatterdaySaintMusicians.com. He served as a PO1 and distinguished instructor in the US Navy. He has an MBA from American InterContinental University.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 6, “Revelation”

Summary – The detectives show up at the Lafferty home to interrogate Ma Lafferty about the whereabouts of Ron and Dan. She claims they are not there. Pyre takes Brother Brady to the basement to interrogate him about the School of the Prophets meetings there. Brady claims that he experienced a “burning of the bosom” during those meetings and questions why Pyre is so sure those revelations weren’t true. In a flashback, Ron travels to Oregon in search of “true Mormonism” from a man named John Bryant. He discovers Bryant’s commune practicing a “free love” version of polygamy and drinking wine, claiming it’s natural and spiritual and that the Word of Wisdom is an outdated part of the temperance movement. During a communal bath, Bryant explains that he’s received a revelation that he is the One Mighty and Strong and asks to baptize Ron. After he does, Ron is overcome with love and kisses Bryant. Ron returns home to find the School of the Prophets working hard to print pamphlets of warning to the Church based on Prophet Onias’s revelations. They demand that polygamy and the priesthood ban for black members be restored. Onias tells Ron he believes that the six Lafferty brothers are chosen to help him in his work. He takes Ron up the mountain to his Dream Mine, where he believes a great treasure is buried under a capstone. Onias tells Ron that he believes Ron is the One Mighty and Strong and that Diana will come back to him when she sees how blessed he is in this work. Later in the episode, Ron writes a revelation to Diana and reads it to the School of the Prophets. They vote on its authenticity and approve it as true, declaring Ron as the one mighty and strong. Meanwhile, in the present, Taba finds a recently sawed-off shotgun and takes this as evidence that Ron and Dan are nearby. When the detectives confront Ma Lafferty, she calls Taba a dark-skinned Lamanite and claims that the only law she’s subject to is the law of God. When they press her, she blames everything on two men who were with her sons, Chip and Ricky, who had long hair and smelled like skunk. In flashback, Allen comes home to Brenda who is distressed about baby Erica’s fever, but Allen refuses to let her go to a doctor until he can figure out whether his brothers are right about not trusting modern medicine. They get into an argument during which he hits her. Brenda stands up and walks out. A little while later, Brenda’s sister comes to take her to the doctor while Brenda’s dad, Bishop Wright, stays with Allen and grills him about being too extreme in his religious beliefs. Meanwhile, Brenda tells her sister she wants to leave Allen because “this is how it started with Diana,” but her sister pressures her to stay or to let her bishop make the decision for her.  At the Pyre’s home, Pyre visits with Bishop Wright and Brenda as he tries to reassure them. The Wrights wonder if Pyre will be swayed by the “power” of the Lafferty name and question what he’ll do if the case causes trouble for people “above.” Pyre swears loyalty to Brenda alone and says that the Laffertys have no hold on him. Brenda’s sister gives Pyre a pile of her sister’s letters, hoping to piece together the events leading up to the murder. After the Wrights leave, Pyre gives his mother a bath. Grandma Pyre admits that she pinched Pyre’s wife and claims “the devil made me do it.” Pyre uses a “fake” priesthood blessing to calm her and get her to rinse her hair. In flashbacks, Diana and Brenda’s letter got her a meeting with a member of the Seventy. The men offer the solution that “true revelation causes an increase in love and appreciation for the brethren.” Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as a counterargument, saying that Brigham Young commanded it and it couldn’t have been inspired. The seventies try to push the issue aside, but Allen accuses them of inconsistency and storms out. Brenda asks the seventies to approve a divorce, but instead, they give Brenda a blessing, calling her to bring the Laffertys back into the fold. Brenda takes up this cause very literally, buying forbidden store-bought goods for her sisters-in-law and sending missionaries to talk with them. As a result of this meddling, Matilda arrives on Brenda’s doorstep with a warning: “A wife who alienates her husband from her children risks her life.” Because of this threat, Bishop Low and his wife smuggle Diana and her children out of town, though Brenda insists on staying to carry out her calling. Pyre asks Allen about the likelihood that his brothers will leave Diana alone, but this conversation devolves into a discussion of Pyre’s faith crisis. Allen says he “tried to defeat the Church in my mind and see what was left.” He tells Pyre about a red book in his house that tells “a truer story of our people.” Pyre takes Allen’s book home and is reading it in the car and sobbing when his wife discovers him. He admits that he’s struggling, and she asks him to pray with her. He tries but he can’t. She tells him that she refuses to struggle through this with him and demands that he bear his testimony in church to strengthen their children’s faith.   Church History – Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as the ultimate example of how revelation is inherently unsafe and unclear. He claims that Brigham Young ordered the massacre. The historical record about whether this is the case is complex, and beyond my scope of expertise. However, I do know that the Church was much more hesitant to comment about the massacre in the 80s, whereas now it has published an essay about the topic as well as supported the publication of a thorough book

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!