Welcome to Pride Month + Today’s Digest

Our daily rundown of the articles from around the web that we feel our readers would enjoy and appreciate. We hope to highlight the best of what’s around.

Public Square Bulletin recommends:

Welcome to Pride Month, Christian

Carl Trueman—World

Carl Trueman offers a full-throated call to oppose Pride month and its use of the rainbow symbol with the same drive that we oppose racist symbols such as Confederate flags and statues.

New survey: corporations failing to respect religious and political diversity

Jerry Bowyer—The Christian Post

Paging Brian Grimm of the Religious Freedom and Business Foundation. Your work is desperately needed. A new report on religious and political diversity among corporations shows disappointing results, with the average score being 12 out of 100.

Journalists might ask: Did fundamentalists actually win their debate with modernists?

Richard Ostling—Get Religion

One hundred years ago, Harry Fosdick asked if modernists or fundamentalists would win the fight for Christianity’s soul. Today many journalists seem to assume the fundamentalists won, but Richard Ostling invites them to re-examine that assumption.

A Defense of Faith Statements

Shirley Mullen—Heterodox Academy

The easy assumption is that universities that require statements of faith to attend limit academic freedom. But a former president of one such university makes the case that by creating a community with shared beliefs, they are able to articulate a voice in a larger marketplace of ideas.

The Problems of Putting off Children

Nathanael Blake—Public Discourse

The author had hoped to have children much younger than typical for highly educated, dual-career couples. But a combination of circumstances prevented that, leading him to have children at about the age many of his peers did. He has some thoughts about the drawbacks of this status-quo.

On Key

You Might Also Like

The Other Religion

The ongoing disaffection of educated church members in North America can’t be understood apart from the recent emergence of an appealing alternative religion.

Is an “Asylum Ban” really necessary?

President Biden and other leaders were recently sent a letter from numerous religious organizations pleading with them not to pursue or enact the proposed “asylum ban.” This proposal would ban asylum seekers unless they were registered prior to entering the U.S. or sought asylum in other countries along their travels.  Per the Biden administration an app would be developed that would allow travelers to register prior to entering.  An app that most would not be able to use due to lack of financial resources. One comment from the religious leaders in the letter states:  “Our diverse faith traditions compel us to love our neighbor, accompany the vulnerable, and welcome the sojourner—regardless of place of birth, religion, or ethnicity. Importantly, our faiths also urge us to boldly resist and dismantle systems of oppression.”

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This