An act of empathy confronts judgment, representing the impact of LDS garment changes.

Judgment, Modesty, and Identity: Navigating Reactions to Garment Changes

How do changes to a sacred symbol like the temple garment reveal deeper concerns about judgment, modesty, and identity within the faith community?

In October 2024, changes to the temple garment and recent social media conversations brought a wide range of reactions from members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. News that several new garment styles, including sleeveless tops, were being released in hot climates such as Uganda, Kenya, South Africa, and the Philippines sparked immediate reactions. Responses ranged from “I can’t wait!” to “This hurts!” and similar sentiments were common in conversations at work, in family chat threads, and across social media platforms.

The reactions reveal a wide spectrum of perspectives within the church community. Is it possible that our reactions to the change offer some insight as to how judgment might play a significant role in how we live our faith?

This hopeful possibility illustrates how small, thoughtful adjustments can bring about greater inclusivity and devotion.

For some, excitement over new fashion options was the dominant response. These individuals are eager to embrace the possibilities the changes bring, appreciating the aesthetic appeal while also remaining fully committed to wearing garments regardless of style. This reaction, though overwhelmingly positive, tends to reflect an easygoing outlook—people whose faith is not shaken by outward changes, as their core beliefs remain firmly intact either way.

On the other end of the spectrum are those who have already distanced themselves from garment-wearing, using their clothing choices as a form of protest against church culture. For some in this group, the introduction of new garment styles complicates their ability to signal nonconformity. Some may harbor latent resentment, feeling that these changes arrived too late—after they had already made their choice to leave or distance themselves from the Church. Their response likely holds a complex blend of frustration and indifference, as the garment no longer pertains to them, but, at the same time, somehow, it still bothers them.

Will some of them return to explore the possibilities now? Or will some who struggle feel more inclined to wear garments with greater regularity, given a wider range of comfort and fashion options? It’s encouraging to imagine that these changes might deepen faith for some. This hopeful possibility illustrates how small, thoughtful adjustments can bring about greater inclusivity and devotion.

For some who are more activist in their approach, the new garment styles are seen as a validation of their efforts, interpreting the change as a victory for causes they have championed. For them, it likely represents a step forward and hope for change on other issues. However, while this enthusiasm may be understandable, it overlooks possible deeper spiritual reasons behind any change within the Church. Rather than being a response to external pressures, these adjustments more likely come from a sacred process that reflects ongoing efforts to meet the needs of members while preserving the spiritual significance of many aspects of our faith. Recognizing this nuance allows for a more thoughtful, self-reflective advocacy.

Lastly, there is a group who are grappling with how these changes affect long-held teachings about modesty. For many, the garment has served as a tangible standard of modesty, and this shift challenges understanding of those details. This group is wondering how to explain these changes to others, feeling as though the foundation of consistent teachings has been unsettled without context or direction. This group represents those earnestly seeking a deeper understanding in their faith. Their response comes from a place of sincere dedication to the values they’ve cherished, and their desire for clarity and consistency highlights the importance of thoughtful, open dialogue as changes are introduced.

Our Common Thread:  Judging and the Role of Righteous Judgment 

Within each of these groups, it is possible that judgments are made about others. People often assess one another based on thin slices of external markers such as modesty, fashion, rebellion, or activism. There are subtle and distinct ways to send signals, such as wearing rainbow or flag lapel pins. Many wear crosses to signify discipleship, though others see that as disrespectful. And, of course, there are judgments based on whether someone’s clothing indicates they are wearing garments.

Righteous judgment is not about ignoring signals. It’s about seeing beyond them.

This tendency reflects a broad human ability to make observations and a desire for safety, identity, and knowing “who is like me.” Doing so is natural and sometimes necessary for navigating social interactions and even for personal safety. However, just because something is considered natural doesn’t automatically excuse it. Indeed, there are many behaviors that could be categorized that way.

The Lord provides a higher, holier way of doing things, in this case, that of righteous judgment. Using righteous judgment and being judgmental can be considered two separate experiences. The desire of our own heart lies at the center of the difference. Righteous judgment involves discerning between good and evil, whereas being judgmental is more about casting blame, shame, or finding fault with others. Righteous judgment is used circumstantially to make observations, not to actually pass judgment on people in place of Christ. We are taught to discern situations and behaviors, not to condemn people because of them.

Righteous judgment is not about ignoring external signals that someone is maybe struggling with a certain doctrine or practice. Righteous judgment is about using love, empathy, and understanding to see beyond these signals. As Elder Hirst observed, “If someone we care about seems distant from a sense of divine love, we can follow this pattern—by doing things that bring us closer to God ourselves and then doing things that bring us closer to them.” 

It is not our place to look down or cast shame on individuals who may not be doing things in the way we feel they ought to or even the way that we have been instructed to by the prophet himself. Christ teaches the way to judge and tells us it is as plain as night and day. He offers this indication as counsel, “By their fruits ye shall know them,” and presents these questions to help our discernment, “Does it invite good and persuade belief in Christ?”  

Moving Beyond the Surface: Modesty, Identity, and Faith in the Modern World

Those feeling confusion—members who are struggling to pivot from the modesty standards they’ve long adhered to—are deeply affected by the changes. For them, garments have been more than just fabric; they have served as a powerful symbol of faith, representing obedience and modesty, and adopted as part of their identity as a covenant-keeping people. The shift feels unsettling because it touches on something they have deeply integrated into both their spiritual and daily lives.

While the outward form may change, the sacredness and purpose behind it do not.

Changes to something so intimate can naturally stir feelings of uncertainty. In those first moments, we may wonder if the meaning is shifting, too. Ultimately, we come to recognize that while the outward form may change, the sacredness and purpose behind it do not. This announcement comes with an opportunity to revisit personal understanding of why one wears the garment and what it truly represents, inviting a deeper understanding of modesty and sacred identity. Ultimately, we understand that modesty isn’t only about covering our bodies in a specific way but about how we carry ourselves, how we view our bodies, and how we honor the covenants we have made to wear the garment.

It’s natural to feel a sense of loss when familiar practices change. But we are reminded time and again that it is the Lord who leads His Church through ongoing revelation. Just as temple practices and ordinances have adapted over time, this change in the garment invites us to trust in His direction while staying grounded in the eternal principles that have not changed. Sometimes, things change to help us better live the principles we’ve been taught. 

Perhaps one of them is empathy, to view each other with charity—to righteously judge ourselves, our faith, and others around us. Through this process, we can signal our discipleship and a higher, holier way of facing changes and navigating our reactions to them. Because, after all, there’s likely more coming.

About the author

Carol Rice

Carol Rice serves as the Director of Communications for Public Square Magazine, a collaborative project of the Elizabeth McCune Foundation. She holds a Master of Arts in Professional Communications and a Bachelor of Arts in Marriage and Family Relations with an emphasis in family advocacy. Carol's work focuses on advancing public discourse around family dynamics, communication, and social issues. She and her husband are parents to five children and reside in Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Will Latter-day Saints find Themselves on the Left on Abortion?

This week Fr. Thomas Reese called on US Catholic bishops to start supporting the Democratic party if they do end up victorious on the issue of abortion. Reese argues that while ending abortion is an important priority for these bishops, once that goal has been passed they may find themselves more generally aligned with Democrats. Reese’s article got me thinking about how a major change in abortion law may affect Latter-day Saints’ political leanings. This will likely depend in part on how abortion law is settled. Whether a national legislative compromise can be reached or it does go to the states. But if the Supreme Court rules in Dobbs that there is no constitutional right to an abortion and the matter returns to the states, we may see Latter-day Saints shift significantly. There are currently ten states that, in this scenario, would outlaw abortion without exceptions for rape or incest. While the Church’s position emphasizes opposition to elective abortion for convenience, it does allow exceptions for pregnancies that result from rape or incest. To be clear, the Church itself does not favor or oppose specific legislative proposals. And yet if the large question on abortion shifts from whether or not elective abortion should be legal to whether or not there should be exceptions to allow abortion for rape or incest, Latter-day Saints may find their sympathies on the opposite side of the abortion debate. Just as not all Latter-day Saints today advocate that the law match the Church’s position today, some Latter-day Saints might argue that while the Church’s position is for the whole world, not every country needs to allow those exceptions. So I certainly don’t mean to suggest that every Latter-day Saint must shift, but it’s certainly worth noting as a potential future trend.    

Art of Black Christian Pastor Preaching to a Congregation | Strong Black Families: God, Relationships, & Deep Faith | Public Square Magazine | Black Christians & Their Deep Faith

Strong Black Families: God, Relationships, and Deep Faith

In contrast to the negative scrutiny of African American families in the past, and consistent with the current focus on hearing the voices of Black Americans, the words and experiences of Black Christian American families of faith are both refreshing and profoundly instructive.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This