Capitol

Where Are Our Wise Advisors?

There is great wisdom in receiving counsel and safety in seeking advisement. When a family, a community, or a nation loses this capacity, its effects ripple out in all directions.

We need wise leaders at every level of government. In fact, Latter-day Saints are under scriptural command in this regard.

The Doctrine and Covenants admonishes:

“Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold; otherwise whatsoever is less than these cometh of evil.”

But much of a leader’s wisdom is derived from great advisors. Young Arthur had Merlin. King David had the prophet Nathan. When assessing our contemporary political landscape on the left and the right, I cannot help but query: Where are our wise advisors?

In her landmark book, The Highly Sensitive Person, psychologist Elaine N. Aron identified two types of leaders: “warrior kings” and “priestly advisors.” According to Aron, the personality traits of these leaders and advisors balance each other out and are necessary to long-lasting governments that promote the common good.

“If the warrior mindset is not balanced,” Aron warned, “a society can get into considerable trouble by not looking ahead to the long-term consequences.”

Queen Esther had Mordecai. Abraham Lincoln had his team of rivals.

As the United States is increasingly polarized, it may trend increasingly toward warrior leaders. Those leaders need wise advisors. It’s my hope that the two advisors inside the White House who share my faith—Robert O’Brien, the President’s incoming United States National Security Advisor, and Gregory Smith, the Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Political Affairs for Policy & Personnellive up to the mantle of being wise advisors. I hope the same can be said for all others who serve at the nation’s highest levels. 

However, I admit that my faith in this regard is being tested.

I see too many wise advisors across the political spectrum leaving important positions both in Congress and within this administration. While those who replace them can also be thoughtful and wise, there seems to be a trend where people taking power are louder and more aggressive. They appear to be warrior kings, not wise advisors. As a result, in lieu of moderating voices, our halls of power are increasingly peopled with those of impetuous, intemperate instincts, rather than advisors who might provide the balance of a “priestly advisor.” 

“I fear that those with the skills, education, and experience in wise government are no longer welcome and are less and less willing to invest their careers in public service.”

For instance, Attorney General Jeff Sessions endured months of criticism from the president after he recused himself from the Russia investigation until he was fired for this initial act of integrity. And Senator Jeff Flake, along with other moderates, has been politically sidelined. 

Franklin D. Roosevelt had Eleanor. Frodo Baggins had Gandalf.

Other wise advisors are leaving Congress, including Pennsylvania Representative Charlie Dent and Texas Representative Will Hurd, both Republicans. Without traditionally conservative and moderate voices, once again, more poisonous forms of partisanship have space to dominate. Similar patterns left Congress in near-ruins in the 1980s and 1990s. And in seemingly parallel fashion, both the left and right increasingly embrace populist fervor and a slash-and-burn, take-no-prisoners set of tactics.  

Queen Victoria had Prince Albert. Harry Potter had Albus Dumbledore.

Sweeping actions based on petty grievances and ignorance, desire for power for power’s sake and profit for profit’s sake, desire to achieve one’s own ends without the possibility of principled compromise—these seem to be leading the United States government to ignore the public good. 

I fear that those with the skills, education, and experience in wise government are no longer welcome and are less and less willing to invest their careers in public service. In the coming 2020 elections, we should seek and vote for candidates with foresight and wisdom, temperance and judgment. 

We should elect brave warriors with wise advisors who will speak up for common sense and sound principles, who will seek to moderate the damaging extremes that have overtaken our government and political processes. 

We need Merlins and Mordecais, Eleanors and Nathans. We need leaders willing to listen to the wise advisors. We even need teams of rivals who will act in civility and service of the nation’s interest. It’s time to bring the wise advisors—and the warrior kings who will listen to them—back into our federal, state, and local governments.

About the author

Lisa Bolin Hawkins

Lisa Bolin Hawkins is an editor, writer, family historian, and retired lawyer. She previously taught in the Brigham Young University School of Family Life, the Honors Program, and at the J. Reuben Clark Law School. She has a JD from BYU Law.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Jacob Adriaensz. Backer Painting of David & Bathsheba | Bathsheba Draping over David | David’s Other Sin with Bathsheba | Public Square Magazine | David & Bathsheba Story

David’s Other Sin with Bathsheba

In addition to the clear violations against chastity, David’s behavior towards Uriah and Bathsheba reflects an ancient warning against the very exploitation of the powerless we continue to see around us today.

“Deep” Norwegian Film About Nothing in the End

How does a community and the families within it respond to a nearly unspeakable accusation? How do you treat everyone with dignity? How do you suss out the truth? Do you need to? “Armand,” the Norwegian submission for The Academy Award’s best international feature film, sets out as though it is interested in answering those questions. The film opens with a young teacher, a principal, and a school staff member wondering what they are going to do. Armand has done something again. The parents are called in. The film’s premise is that Armand was accused of hitting Jon in the bathroom when Jon said he didn’t want to play with Armand. There are many additional revelations about the context, the relationship between Armand and Jon’s families, and the history of Armand’s family. There are accusations upon accusations that both indict and exonerate the boys and the adults around them. But these revelations eke out. It feels like filling up a mug from a leak in the sink. “If you want us to know what’s happening, just tell us,” I felt like shouting at the screen more than once. The film’s first act works well. The cinematography is ragged, framing its subjects well but always just off from what we’d expect. Too close, or the light is just wrong. It felt like how I imagine it would feel to have my child accused of something horrific.  And when the parents first start talking the tension is terrific. Those first few drops of exposition in the mug were thrilling. Oh there’s something happening here; it’s complicated and interesting.  Thea Lambrechts Vaulen, plays Sunna, a young teacher in over her head trying to manage the meeting between Armand’s mother, Elisabeth, played by Renate Reinsve, and Jon’s parents Sarah and Anders played by Ellen Dorrit Petersen and Endre Hellestveit.  Vaulen is particularly effective. She has been sent on a mission by her principal, Jarle, to make sure the whole thing blows over. Watching her struggle to navigate this while the parents are processing what’s been said is captivating. But it just keeps going.  The film’s entire second act consists of learning the basic facts of what has happened and the context around it. This is a complicated situation, and as a viewer I’m interested to see how the compelling characters navigate that situation. But the screenplay seems mostly interested in telling you the information. As though learning that Armand “plays doctor” at school is enough to compel me to the film’s ending. But once the audience finally understands the situation, the third act begins and flies wildly off the handle into surrealism, including two interpretive dance numbers, three over-the-top metaphors, and five straight minutes of Anders’ mother laughing.  The movie feels so desperate to be deep that it forgets to be about anything. It’s the first film of director Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel, so perhaps the bold ideas and beautiful cinematography will be wielded for a more worthwhile story next time. The film is entirely in Norwegian. And its English subtitles include a fair amount of profanity, though not an overwhelming amount. And the accusations that fly include suicide, alcoholism, and sexual assault. So these are adult themes. The film is R-rated, but not an egregious one, it pretty well all takes place in a parent-teacher conference.  I can’t imagine ever showing this to my kids. The themes are hard ones, and the film has nothing worthwhile to say about them. Two out of five stars. Armand releases in US theaters on February 14, 2025.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!