Canva_-_Woman_Feeling_Emotional_Stress (1)

Faith and the Long Uncertainties of COVID

Long COVID brought not only disabling fatigue and brain fog but a soul-stretching challenge to my sense of self.

New data collected by the CDC and Census Bureau shows that nearly one out of five U.S. adults who got COVID have developed long COVID, with symptoms lasting at least 3 months. As a woman in my 50s, the new data reveals, I lost the demographic lottery and belong to the group most likely to develop long COVID. Sure enough, I recently hit my two-year-long COVID anniversary. 

I got sick on June 20, 2020. Two weeks went by, then three, then four. My symptoms—overpowering fatigue, fever, sore throat, swollen lymph nodes, achiness, numbness in my fingertips, lightheadedness, jumping heart rate, cognitive issues, nausea, and GI tract issues—simply never left. One load of laundry became an all-day task. Emptying my dishwasher took three tries some days because I had to take breaks to lie down.

Confronting one’s mortality is famously daunting, but the smaller uncertainty that grew by the month bled me emotionally and spiritually: will I ever get better? How do I face off with a brand-new disease that has no official diagnostic criteria or prognosis? Six weeks into a “mild” non-hospitalized infection, I saw an infectious disease specialist. Diagnosis: post-COVID syndrome. Treatment: “Call me if anything changes.”

After 20 years as a lawyer, I could no longer tuck away facts, to-do lists, and legal arguments in my brain, not with any hope of finding them again. Thinking felt like swimming through molasses. I forgot everyday words like “light fixture” and had to talk around them. On bad days, I had trouble writing a single page of text after a career of writing and editing hundreds of pages.

Chronic illness pares away the detritus of life—need-tos and should-dos evaporate, leaving a raw heart searching God.

I love my work in international human rights and religion but never thought it defined me—family, friends, and faith were always my core. Yet my sense of self became as slippery as time in a pandemic. How do you reconcile a purpose-driven life with days spent binging seasons of TV mysteries? Being is more than doing, but when doing nothing, when do you cease to be your former self?

Divine silence to my pleas for health pushed me to pray for patience instead. I should have known better. At four months, I had a heart attack scare, a debilitating blood clot at five months, some improvement at six, followed by a relapse at eight that included my hair falling out and five months of vertigo and dizziness. 

I was tangibly buoyed up by prayers and love from Muslim, Jewish, Orthodox, Protestant, Catholic, and non-religiously affiliated friends and colleagues around the world and blessed by dozens of meals and practical help from members of my own local religious community, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. But my heart hurt as I snapped at my kids. As my condition endured, I tried not to imagine the long-term implications. 

Uncertainty in an era of instant internet answers often seems an embarrassing guest, especially among faith communities. Ambiguity in life’s challenges can defy the certain answers we often hope faith will give. At times the unknowns and not-yets push and pull violently on the soul, stretching us again and again. 

For me, like most Americans, COVID did not shake my belief in God but reminded me I am not the author of my life’s story. Chronic illness pares away the detritus of life—need-tos and should-dos evaporate, leaving a raw heart searching God. Who am I? What can I expect from God? From my future?

Peace came through a phrase from the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer. While in prison, shortly before being executed by the Nazis for participating in an anti-government plot, he penned: “Whoever I am, O Lord, Thou knowest I am thine.” The line stayed on my phone’s lock screen for the better part of a year and remains a part of me.

There were no medically-tested treatments during the first year; long COVID was simply too new. Waiting, trusting, and hoping were all I had. As medical research has improved over the past year, I’ve been blessed with care from a clinic that tracks current research and works with long-haulers. To my own surprise, I have made remarkable progress, though I still struggle with post-COVID POTS and fatigue when I do too much.

For the other 1 in 13 Americans facing long COVID, I wish you likewise helpful medical care, a supportive community, and an ability to live with the hard-edged uncertainties that may come. May you, like Bonhoeffer, feel known even amidst the unknowable.

About the author

Elizabeth A. Clark

Elizabeth A. Clark works with governments, scholars, and faith groups around the world as the Associate Director of the BYU International Center for Law and Religion Studies and as a member of the OSCE Advisory Panel on Freedom of Religion or Belief.
On Key

You Might Also Like

A reflection on violence in film

Gladiator II is a serviceable historical epic. If you loved Gladiator, you’ll like Gladiator II. Gladiator II opens as Rome is about to siege the “last free city in Africa.” Our nameless hero loses valiantly with his wife dying in the battle, and he is brought to be a slave in Rome. But if our hero can perform well enough as a gladiator, he can buy his own freedom. And with that, we’re off. The beats of this film will be familiar, with a massive twist only halfway through that changes the stakes for everyone. Our hero is really the son of our hero from the last movie! Which means he has a legitimate claim to the throne of Rome. The movie tries to follow three different stories. Our hero (Paul Mescal) is trying to win his freedom and avenge his wife’s death. Acacius (Pedro Pascal), the general of the armies, wants respite and time with his wife; he also wants to lead a coup against the emperors. Macrinus (Denzel Washington) wants to work his way up in Roman power through political scheming. And then on top of all of that, we are told that our hero must deal with his father’s legacy and discover who he truly is.  It’s a lot, even for an epic, and the screenplay is not nearly tight enough to keep all the storylines coherent and moving. We are led to believe that Macrinus is successful in maneuvering to the top of Roman society because of his exceptional political skill, and Denzel Washington’s delicious performance makes that believable, but all we actually see him do is win a bet and carry out an assassination. Pedro Pascal’s excellent work as the weary general does some of the work in helping reconcile the contradictions in his character, but a look on his face here or there has to carry a lot that a simple conversation could have fleshed out.  Perhaps the reason the script doesn’t have time to breathe is also its biggest contradiction. There is something grotesque about watching audiences cheer on the brutal violence taking place in the film. And yet, the entire film is centered on having us, the audience, watch one set piece of over-the-top violence after another. We don’t get to see Macrinus manipulate the Roman senate because, instead, we need to see our hero fighting with CGI rhinos or CGI sharks. There is a place for violence in a moral movie. It can be helpful to attune our senses to recoil from violence or recognize the rare places it is justified. But the violence on display in Gladiator II is so relentless and gratuitous that it dulls the senses instead.  This is not to diminish the craftsmanship that has been used to bring this world and its many battle scenes to light. Rome feels broad and alive in true epic fashion, and it’s easy to get swept away into its world—with the exception of a few uncharacteristic pieces of clunky CGI work. The opening battle sequence is perhaps the best ever put to screen.  The best part of Gladiator II was its opening. A 1950s style opening credits are shown over a lavish dreamy animated retelling of the first film. Everything about it screams that something epic is about to be shown. But throughout the movie I stayed fixated on what it could have been. What if it had been more focused on the characters I cared about? What if it didn’t try to connect so much plot to the previous film and let this story stand on its own merits? What if they had expanded it to a TV miniseries so that its many plot points had space to breathe? In the end, despite some good acting and a beautiful setting, the movie just left so much to be wanted.  Gladiator II is R-rated. It is not appropriate for children or, in my estimation, most adults. At its core, this film has a moral message: life is hard, but it’s worth fighting for. But the way it’s presented on screen does more to drag down the spirit than to lift it up. Two and a half out of five stars. Gladiator II opens nationwide November 22, 2024.