Woman leading volunteers to end world hunger.

From Pews to Pantries: How a Church’s Welfare Program is Revolutionizing Global Aid

How do the Church of Jesus Christ Women-led initiatives, partnerships, and comprehensive care drive their mission?

Followers of Jesus Christ are not unfamiliar with the frequent admonition from Him to take care of the less fortunate. As President Dallin H. Oaks has said, “Giving to those in need is a principle in all Abrahamic religions.” Indeed, for members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the words of King Benjamin are recited almost anthemically, “… when ye are in the service of your fellow beings, ye are only in the service of your God.” 

Caring for those in need is a foundational principle of the gospel of Jesus Christ. From the beginning of the modern church, the Lord has clearly created a pattern of priority for the leadership in these efforts: “And they shall look to the poor and the needy, and administer to their relief that they shall not suffer.” In the effort to remain accountable and transparent about these priorities, members are able to see yearly reports and caring summaries to see exactly how leadership is highlighting this mission as disciples of Christ. 

The 2023 Caring Summary focuses on the efforts of the Church and its members, which include $1.36 billion in expenditures, 6.2 million hours volunteered, 4,119 humanitarian projects, and 191 countries and territories served. These efforts reflect the mission and purpose of the Church’s welfare program. As President Eyring has previously stated

Great temporal needs of the children of Heavenly Father have come again in our time as they have and as they will in all times. The principles at the foundation of the Church welfare program are not for only one time or one place. They are for all times and all places.

One need only look at previous summaries to see that year after year, the Church and its members continue to give more in terms of time, funds, and services. These projects, services, and funds ongoingly provide for healthcare, education, disaster relief, self-reliance education, refugees, housing, mental healthcare, and so much more.

Caring for those in need is a foundational principle of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

The continuing efforts to take care of those in need reflect and support President Nelson’s remarks: “The two great commandments can guide us: first, to love God and, second, to love our neighbor. We show our love by serving.”

Of particular note have been the efforts headed by the General Relief Society Presidency to combat hunger and malnutrition. The World Food Program estimates that every year, 3 million children die from hunger-related causes. In response to this sobering reality, the President of the General Relief Society, Camille N. Johnson, has said: “No humanitarian effort is more foundational to Christ’s Church than feeding the hungry.” 

To help reach as many families as possible, the General Relief Society Presidency and board have made efforts over the years to partner with other organizations to increase overall positive impact, including CARE, Catholic Relief Services, The Hunger Project, The World Food Program, and UNICEF’s No Time to Waste Initiative. 

The General Relief Society Presidency and board seem to be uniquely qualified and situated to head the initiative. The Church highlights on its website the needs of underserved and underprivileged women and children in particular:

Many children around the world suffer from the effects of malnutrition. Healthy nutrition is essential to proper brain, body, and immune system development, especially from the time of conception to ages 2-3. If a child does not receive the proper nutrition during this time, the child’s brain and body will not develop as they should.

Additionally, they are focused on helping “children have access to comprehensive nutrition care, including nutritious foods, safe drinking water, supported access to local clinical services, and other factors.” The photo below shows the resources listed on the Church’s website, with guides and information on helping local leadership and families become educated on the various aspects of malnutrition.

The Church of Jesus Christ has provided guides to help local leaders end world hunger
The Church’s Guides for families and local leadership.

Evidenced by this snapshot, they have been incredibly thorough in not only recognizing and supplying guides for the specific needs of the people affected by malnutrition but also creating a way for families and leaders to be proactive in their efforts to prevent such suffering in the first place. 

As I have pondered this goal further, there are, perhaps, a few other questions that may be worth exploring. The effort to eliminate malnutrition within the membership of the Church is quite amazing; however, why do they emphasize eliminating it within membership only rather than eliminating it generally? Are they reverting their efforts to focus only on the members? And what might this mean for humanitarian efforts moving forward?

The Church is in a unique position with its carefully laid infrastructure.

At first glance, these thoughts and questions certainly have merit. However, I would posit that the Church does not have to cease or redirect efforts to eliminate malnutrition for those in need generally to have a particular focus on members. The Church does not discriminate in its efforts to ease the suffering of God’s children.

Rather, the Church is in a unique position with its carefully laid infrastructure to be able to identify members in need more readily than many other organizations. The Church is designed to, ideally, look after “the one.” If we work down the ladder, Stake Presidents oversee Bishops who oversee the Elder’s Quorum and Relief Society who both oversee ministering efforts to oversee individuals and families, often both within and outside of the Church. While this is not the structure in all places depending on membership density, this example gives an idea of how they have focused on creating a system that allows for the greatest opportunity to know the needs of each member and supply them with the resources or help required.

With the right training and access to resources, it is not unfathomable that the Church would indeed be able to end malnutrition within the membership because of this infrastructure. This is, perhaps, what makes this particular effort and goal of the General Relief Society so amazing—we can reasonably accomplish this! That is not to say that it is without great effort or that there will be no difficulties to overcome. It is to say that there is a viable path forward to end malnutrition within the vast membership of the Church on a worldwide scale in a way that has never been done before. Further, it is entirely achievable without diminishing efforts in other areas to eliminate suffering beyond membership.

About the author

Brianna Holmes

Brianna Holmes graduated with a degree in Marriage, Couples, and Family Counseling and is currently a practicing counselor in Utah. Her area of interest is how professionals can focus on the agentic nature of human beings in therapeutic practices. She and her husband are parents to four beautiful children.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Room Next Door Review

“The Room Next Door” is the latest example of arthouse social engineering.  The film is about a troubled woman, Martha, who in the midst of cancer treatments decides to commit suicide. If this bothers you, the film implies, it is because there is something wrong with you. This is all the more troubling, because the film, in many ways, is beautiful. It is directed by Pedro Almodóvar, one of the most acclaimed living film directors, in his first full-length film in English. And you can’t help but be taken by the beauty of it all. The film is suffused with the soft colors of the woods. Despite being an entire screenplay full of little except two friends talking, the camera work keeps the film alive and moving. And Julianne Moore and Tilda Swinton who play Ingrid and Martha once again give impeccable, engaging performances, that you can’t help but admire.  But all the beauty in this film is in service of a story that is decidedly ugly—but not self-awarely so. Our two main characters are old friends who met as young writers. Ingrid has published a best seller recently, where she writes about how she can’t accept death. On her publicity tour, she learns that Martha is in the hospital with cancer. She goes to visit her and reignite their friendship. We learn through the conversations that these characters aren’t bad people, necessarily, they just struggle to see a world outside of their own desires and consciousness. They have repeatedly avoided building relationships or having families. Martha does have a daughter. But she chased her father away, then lied to her about who he was her whole life, and then proceeded to be an absent mother so she could chase the romanticism of being a war correspondent.  Now that she is sick and dying, she notices that she has no one in her life. The movie comments on this like an unusual quirk, rather than the inevitable result of a life of bad decisions. We learn early on that cancer treatment can be a roller coaster with euphoric peaks, and miserable nadirs. During one such rut, Martha purchases a suicide pill, and decides she will kill herself. She reaches out to Ingrid and asks her to come on vacation with her, so that she will have someone in the house when she does it.  Ingrid agrees. And although she early on expresses some discomfort, she quickly respects Martha’s wishes to largely pretend nothing is happening. They have a lovely vacation in upstate New York watching old movies and reading books. While they are there, Ingrid reconnects with Damien (John Turturo) an ex-boyfriend of both hers and Martha’s. He is horrified at the state of the world, and seems to only live for sex (or to constantly talk about sex.) Damien is not a sympathetic character, and perhaps the audience is supposed to read that his unpleasant and helpless politics are akin to Martha’s helpless approach to life. If so the audience hardly has time to ponder it under a heavy heaping of affirmations about the power to choose, and the dignity to die.  Eventually, Martha does exactly what she promised to do. There is a brief police investigation where the officer (Alessandro Nivola) expresses concern that Ingrid would have knowingly not gotten help for her friend. A lawyer comes and helpfully tells the audience we can ignore that concern because he is a religious fanatic. This is the kind of movie that alludes to James Joyce not just once but three times. It is so pleased with just how artsy it is. And for a film with a message like “life isn’t worth fighting for,” the best comfort is that it’s so artsy not a lot of people will watch it.  The only people I would recommend watching this film is for those studying how society has devalued human life, and how good tools can be misused to harm people. The film is rated PG-13. It includes several normalized same-sex relationships, and some joking about polyamorous relationships. But obviously the biggest warning is the way it normalizes and glamorizes suicide. If you watch it with older teenagers, I would focus on questions about the choice that Martha made, and how family and relationships could have helped her make better choices. I might ask about how Ingrid could have been a better or more caring friend. One out of five stars. “The Room Next Door” will be released in theaters nationwide January 17, 2025.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!