pexels-photo-3551841

The 1965 Salt Lake City Race Riot that Never Happened

Provocative rhetoric has been sown in America’s discourse with an intentional aim to inflame tensions. Something similar took place in Utah in 1965.

In the wake of the protests in Salt Lake City, rumors circulated of impending home invasions throughout northern Utah. Protestors allegedly planned to knock doors and “if people answer when they knock, they [would shoot] to prove black lives matter.” Police departments throughout the region issued statements through social media that there seemed to be no credible threat. In fact, the rumors may have been sparked by social media posts such as one posted by “Blacklivess Matter” which promised “we will be assassinating white families until justice is served!!!” or another from “ANTIFA America” which declared “Tonight we say ‘F— The City’ and we move into the residential areas . . . the white hoods . . . and we take what’s ours.” This was frightening, except like the rumors in Utah, they were part of a hoax. For instance, NBC News discovered that the ANTIFA America account was linked to a neo-Nazi group known as Identity Evropa. The goal of such rumors was to sow discord, fear, and like actual violence among the protests, served to delegitimatize a movement and distract from its message.

This tactic of disinformation and propaganda has a long history among governments and has been employed in the United States on numerous occasions. Sadly, the rumors of BLM-inspired violence in northern Utah is reminiscent of a similar disinformation campaign leveled against Utahns in September 1965. 

We must be ever vigilant against this sort of divisive rumor.

As a student at the University of Utah then noted, “…a surprising number of supposedly intelligent residents of Salt Lake City have been taken in by rumors that a Watts-like riot will take place in Salt Lake City this weekend when the Mormon Church gathers for its general conference.” Reed Benson, then president of the Utah-chapter of the John Birch Society, had encouraged members to begin this “whispering campaign” to thwart the Civil Rights Movement which he believed was “Communist-controlled, influenced, and dominated.”

The NAACP responded by censuring the National Guard and Salt Lake City Police for spreading these rumors and restating its commitment against violence. They denied that any such demonstrations were planned in the Salt Lake City area and posited that the “rumors started with certain right-wing societies that make a practice of scaring people.” The October 1965 general conference passed without incident.

Historian D. Michael Quinn has credited this moment for turning the sympathy of Utah’s political and religious leaders from the John Birch Society. Yet, claims of an impending Salt Lake City race war remained. Three years later, the disinformation campaign resumed when someone began to circulate a new variant of a prophecy credited to the Latter-day Saint prophet John Taylor, now featuring the arrival of thousands of African Americans seeking civil rights in Salt Lake City. “They will knock down the doors of the Temple (east), enter and desecrate the Temple, even to ravishing of women therein,” before violence would be widespread in the area. The spread of this rumor among Latter-day Saints led Church President Harold B. Lee to issue an official response in 1970. It was “just another evidence of the cleverly designed motives of individuals who seize upon the emotionalism of our present day to get publicity, and agitate the feelings of Church members.”

These incidents—those from fifty years ago and those from the past week—remind us that there are some eager to manipulate us for their own ends and to cause us to imagine the absolute worst in one another. We must be ever vigilant against this sort of divisive rumor, more so now that we are in the age of social media. 

About the author

Christopher Blythe

Christopher Blythe is a Research Associate at the Maxwell Institute. He is the co-editor of the Journal of Mormon History, and co-president of the Folklore Society of Utah. He has a PhD in American Religious History from Florida State University.
On Key

You Might Also Like

A New Kind of LGBT+ Advocacy?

In the wake of Elder Holland’s BYU talk, I can’t help but wonder—what would LGBT+ Advocacy “bathed in the light of the gospel” look like?

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 6, “Revelation”

Summary – The detectives show up at the Lafferty home to interrogate Ma Lafferty about the whereabouts of Ron and Dan. She claims they are not there. Pyre takes Brother Brady to the basement to interrogate him about the School of the Prophets meetings there. Brady claims that he experienced a “burning of the bosom” during those meetings and questions why Pyre is so sure those revelations weren’t true. In a flashback, Ron travels to Oregon in search of “true Mormonism” from a man named John Bryant. He discovers Bryant’s commune practicing a “free love” version of polygamy and drinking wine, claiming it’s natural and spiritual and that the Word of Wisdom is an outdated part of the temperance movement. During a communal bath, Bryant explains that he’s received a revelation that he is the One Mighty and Strong and asks to baptize Ron. After he does, Ron is overcome with love and kisses Bryant. Ron returns home to find the School of the Prophets working hard to print pamphlets of warning to the Church based on Prophet Onias’s revelations. They demand that polygamy and the priesthood ban for black members be restored. Onias tells Ron he believes that the six Lafferty brothers are chosen to help him in his work. He takes Ron up the mountain to his Dream Mine, where he believes a great treasure is buried under a capstone. Onias tells Ron that he believes Ron is the One Mighty and Strong and that Diana will come back to him when she sees how blessed he is in this work. Later in the episode, Ron writes a revelation to Diana and reads it to the School of the Prophets. They vote on its authenticity and approve it as true, declaring Ron as the one mighty and strong. Meanwhile, in the present, Taba finds a recently sawed-off shotgun and takes this as evidence that Ron and Dan are nearby. When the detectives confront Ma Lafferty, she calls Taba a dark-skinned Lamanite and claims that the only law she’s subject to is the law of God. When they press her, she blames everything on two men who were with her sons, Chip and Ricky, who had long hair and smelled like skunk. In flashback, Allen comes home to Brenda who is distressed about baby Erica’s fever, but Allen refuses to let her go to a doctor until he can figure out whether his brothers are right about not trusting modern medicine. They get into an argument during which he hits her. Brenda stands up and walks out. A little while later, Brenda’s sister comes to take her to the doctor while Brenda’s dad, Bishop Wright, stays with Allen and grills him about being too extreme in his religious beliefs. Meanwhile, Brenda tells her sister she wants to leave Allen because “this is how it started with Diana,” but her sister pressures her to stay or to let her bishop make the decision for her.  At the Pyre’s home, Pyre visits with Bishop Wright and Brenda as he tries to reassure them. The Wrights wonder if Pyre will be swayed by the “power” of the Lafferty name and question what he’ll do if the case causes trouble for people “above.” Pyre swears loyalty to Brenda alone and says that the Laffertys have no hold on him. Brenda’s sister gives Pyre a pile of her sister’s letters, hoping to piece together the events leading up to the murder. After the Wrights leave, Pyre gives his mother a bath. Grandma Pyre admits that she pinched Pyre’s wife and claims “the devil made me do it.” Pyre uses a “fake” priesthood blessing to calm her and get her to rinse her hair. In flashbacks, Diana and Brenda’s letter got her a meeting with a member of the Seventy. The men offer the solution that “true revelation causes an increase in love and appreciation for the brethren.” Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as a counterargument, saying that Brigham Young commanded it and it couldn’t have been inspired. The seventies try to push the issue aside, but Allen accuses them of inconsistency and storms out. Brenda asks the seventies to approve a divorce, but instead, they give Brenda a blessing, calling her to bring the Laffertys back into the fold. Brenda takes up this cause very literally, buying forbidden store-bought goods for her sisters-in-law and sending missionaries to talk with them. As a result of this meddling, Matilda arrives on Brenda’s doorstep with a warning: “A wife who alienates her husband from her children risks her life.” Because of this threat, Bishop Low and his wife smuggle Diana and her children out of town, though Brenda insists on staying to carry out her calling. Pyre asks Allen about the likelihood that his brothers will leave Diana alone, but this conversation devolves into a discussion of Pyre’s faith crisis. Allen says he “tried to defeat the Church in my mind and see what was left.” He tells Pyre about a red book in his house that tells “a truer story of our people.” Pyre takes Allen’s book home and is reading it in the car and sobbing when his wife discovers him. He admits that he’s struggling, and she asks him to pray with her. He tries but he can’t. She tells him that she refuses to struggle through this with him and demands that he bear his testimony in church to strengthen their children’s faith.   Church History – Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as the ultimate example of how revelation is inherently unsafe and unclear. He claims that Brigham Young ordered the massacre. The historical record about whether this is the case is complex, and beyond my scope of expertise. However, I do know that the Church was much more hesitant to comment about the massacre in the 80s, whereas now it has published an essay about the topic as well as supported the publication of a thorough book