Elder Patrick Kearon called as an Apostle

Elder Patrick Kearon was born on July 18, 1961, in Carlisle, Cumberland, England. He married Jennifer Carole Hulme in January 1991 and they have four children. Kearon joined The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in 1987. He has served in various church roles, including stake president and Area Seventy. Professionally, Kearon has worked in multiple countries and industries, and ran his own communications consultancy. He has been involved in civic and community service, including on boards of charities and educational institutions. For more details, please visit his bio on the Church’s website.

Elder Patrick Kearon’s messages in General Conference convey a strong emphasis on compassion, healing, obedience, and resilience through Christ’s Atonement. In his 2016 talk, “Refuge from the Storm,” he calls for empathy towards refugees, linking this to the Church’s history and Christian responsibilities. Kearon says, “Our response to refugees […] is a litmus test of our discipleship.” His 2022 talk, “He Is Risen with Healing in His Wings: We Can Be More Than Conquerors,” offers solace and empowerment to those facing abuse, underscoring the transformative power of Christ’s Atonement. “No matter our suffering,” he affirms, “we can find comfort in Him.” His 2010 address, “Come unto Me with Full Purpose of Heart, and I Shall Heal You,” highlights the importance of obedience to gospel teachings, using a personal story to stress the necessity of full-hearted dedication to Christ for genuine peace. These messages collectively illustrate his unwavering commitment to fostering a Christ-centered life marked by deep compassion, adherence to spiritual guidance, and the pursuit of healing and strength through faith.

For more details and the full context of these quotes, please visit the talks on the Church’s website:

On Key

You Might Also Like

Sunset with Silhouette of Kissing Couple & Man | Some Straight Talk about Polyamory | Public Square Magazine | Divorce Rate in Polyamorous Marriages | Polyamorous Divorce Rates

Some Straight Talk about Polyamory

With popular media and scholars unabashed about popularizing “consensual non-monogamy,” it’s time for some straight talk about the realities behind the alluring rhetoric of “open love.”

Christmas Renovation

So much anger. So much despair. So much fear. Could this Christmas be a time to clear the air of some of that in our own relationships, neighborhoods, and homes?

Could a Latter-day Saint Break the 2 party Monopoly? + Today’s Digest

Our daily rundown of the articles from around the web that we feel our readers would enjoy and appreciate. We hope to highlight the best of what’s around. Public Square Bulletin recommends: Will the Utah Senate Race Break the Partisan Doom Loop? Beau Tremitiere — The Bulwark Latter-day Saint politician Evan McMullin is an independent running for Senate in Utah against Mike Lee. In a very unusual move, however, McMullin has been endorsed by Utah’s Democratic party. Could this cross-partisan alliance signal a new way forward? Conflict in a Society without a Religious Consensus Rick Plasterer — Juicy Ecumenism This article certainly is not the first to suggest that a lack of moral consensus plays a major role in our current political tensions, but Plasterer does an enviable job of tracing the history of this fracturing consensus. Now in the spotlight, Dubai Jews struggle for public synagogue Isabel Debre — Associated Press With a newly announced temple in Dubai, Latter-day Saints may find this article about the Jewish search to find worship space in the city of interest as well. Bravo! The New York Times reports that evangelicals are divided, not united on politics Terry Mattingly — Get Religion The godfather of religious journalism criticism examines the silver linings in a recent article in the New York Times about the state of politics among evangelicals. How We Fought Each Other at Michigan Law Andrew Koppelman, Ilya Shapiro — Heterodox Academy Two law professors at the University of Michigan coming from very different perspectives on constitutional law questions describe how meaningful they find their debates, and how to disagree with one another better.