Public Square 2

Interrupting the Rhythm of Negativity: Announcing a New Venue

Our public square is hurting. Let’s do something about it.

We believe in the public square. And we believe it’s worth preserving. 

That’s not to say, of course, our faith is untested. After all, the public square these days is sometimes inhospitable territory for those who hold romantic ideas about right and wrong, the pursuit of the good, the polis as a place to cultivate virtue, and the church as a seat of salvation. But rather than sit back aghast as the storm clouds of cultural hostility collide, we feel an urgency to build more robust civic shelters. 

One of the central, most under-recognized messages of the Book of Mormon is the fragility of a society overcome by unbridled animosities. So it’s perhaps fitting for a band of members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to try in some small way to counter the accelerating vitriol and caustic rhetoric. 

Today, we announce Public Square Magazine as an effort to amplify thoughtful voices of faith and to lift the contemporary discourse; to cultivate trust amidst disagreement; to extend a call to people of goodwill and sound conscience: bring what you can and bring what’s missing. 

From the Greek Agora to the New England-style commons and “town greens” of colonial times, the public square has functioned as the seat of indispensable, ongoing communication—the core of any community. While some of these exchanges reinforce common commitments and principles, the public square is also a space for navigating disagreements in a productive, civil manner.  

That clearly hasn’t always been the case. Nor does our public discourse always instill great confidence today. More and more, those inclined to speak—religious or not—confront the prospect of capricious kinds of public backlash. We can understand why so many across the political spectrum feel exhausted, checked out, and dejected. Indeed, well-respected Christians have wondered aloud whether now is simply a season for sanctuary or a time for retreat. 

If, in fact, America’s intellectual landscape has grown less friendly to some of its religious sojourners, we say that’s all the more reason to speak with greater cogency in every byway, hill, valley, town hall and, yes, swamp.

It was theologian Stanley Hauerwas who once suggested that Christians lost the 1970’s debate around abortion because they didn’t participate sufficiently in the larger public conversation about sex and related topics, and thus, “by ceding the terms of the debate, the debate got framed in ways that made the failure of conservative Christianity a foregone conclusion.”

Into that kind of a vacuum, it’s been far too easy for terms of public conversation to be established in a manner that occasionally paints faith as incomprehensible, or even threatening, rather than as an essential aspect of life for most of humanity, deserving of studied consideration. 

As Antonio Gramsci once observed, “when one way of thinking becomes dominant enough, it renders other options unthinkable.” After underscoring the need to magnify more positive voices, Elder Quentin L. Cook, a member of The Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, described how adding a new perspective to the conversation “creates a pause in the discourse and allows people to evaluate where they stand on a particular matter.” By contrast, “Silence allows the rhythm of negativity to continue uninterrupted and unchallenged.” 

On a visit to see her missionary son in England near the end of the nineteenth century, Latter-day Saint Elizabeth McCune was alarmed to learn that anti-Mormon agitators were skewing conversation with deceptive injections of fear.  Especially effective was critics’ insistence that if people learned the truth about the Saints living in Utah, they’d understand how oppressed women were within the faith community.

Elizabeth, however, spoke up and provided her own lived experience as a woman in Utah and a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Her voice opened more productive exchanges and multiplied opportunities to share, helping begin formal sister missionary work in the Church.

You can never have enough tolerant and reasoned voices sharing what they believe to be true and beautiful.

We hope this publication will add many thoughtful, considered voices to the public square. We aim to curate the best thinking of people ready to speak, while simultaneously helping awaken future Elizabeth McCunes. We will publish a wide variety of commentaries, essays, and features, from many different stylistic approaches and perspectives. We will cultivate a stable of Latter-day Saint writers and thinkers alongside thoughtful voices of other religious persuasions. 

Despite evidence of the social benefits of religion to society, it’s not entirely uncommon to hear assertions that faith communities are little more than modern barriers to progress or that religion is already too prevalent an influence in society.  

We reply that you can never have enough tolerant and reasoned voices sharing what they believe to be true and beautiful. You can never have enough souls striving toward the divine.

Typically, not far from the American courthouse, town hall, or city square, a house of worship still stands as a reflection of the central value of faith as a community asset. In this new effort, we hope to remind a troubled nation of the continued relevance of faith in addressing so much of what ails us.  

The body of believers must now more than ever put pen to paper; click conviction into every keystroke; stand athwart history and belt “come, come, ye saints” until, in fact, all is well. 

Restoring faith in the public square requires nothing less.   

About the author

On Key

You Might Also Like

Better than Self-Esteem? + Today’s Digest

Our daily rundown of the articles from around the web that we feel our readers would enjoy and appreciate. We hope to highlight the best of what’s around. Public Square Bulletin recommends: Jesus’ Alternative to Self-Esteem H. Wallace Goddard—Meridian Magazine While the gospel has some similarities with the self-esteem movement, Goddard, a parenting expert, looks at the research, and suggests that there may be weaknesses to the self-esteem movement that the gospel can rectify. Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment John Witte Jr.—Canopy Forum An excerpt from the upcoming book of the same name, this fascinating take gives a whirlwind tour of religious freedom, the role the founders and courts have played in developing it, and what we might expect in the next decade. The Perils of Heterodoxy Adam M. Wakeling—Areo Increasingly the information we get is filtered through a smaller and smaller group of individuals, so being independent-minded is important. But this route also comes with dangers that, left unchecked, could prove problematic. Exercising the Virtues Allen Porter—Law & Liberty Physical fitness is an important expression of a virtuous life. The patterns we develop should be consciously chosen and acted on and should be done to shape our minds and bodies in accordance with a higher purpose. Six Theologians Every Thoughtful Person Should Read Bruce Riley Ashford—First Things Excuse the uncharacteristic click-bait headline. This article outlines some of the most influential thinkers in orthodox Christian thought. While none come from the Church of Jesus Christ, each makes thoughtful observations that can not only increase your inter-faith understanding but provide fresh insights into your own faith as well.

“You’re Cordially Invited” Movie Review 2025

“You’re Cordially Invited” is a movie about terrible behavior before a wedding. In an intriguing riff on the premise, the brides are the ones on their best behavior. When Jim (Will Ferrell) calls the venue where he and his late wife were married to schedule the wedding of his daughter, the desk agent confirms,. However, her pen runs out of ink, and she falls over dead before she can replace it. So when Margot (Reese Witherspoon) calls to book the venue located on the property her grandmother used to live on for her sister’s wedding, the event is double booked. A year later, when both wedding parties arrive on the same day, explosions ensue. The screenplay tracks the goodwill between the parties cratering until it hits its nadir with Will Ferrell capturing an alligator, taking it back to the inn, and now that he’s hit rock bottom, deciding he shouldn’t actually release the gator into the other wedding reception. Phew! Character growth achieved, and crisis averted. Performances and Direction In terms of feel, quality, and laughs, I’d put this somewhere between “Bride Wars,” the clunker with Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway also fighting over a wedding venue, and “The Proposal” the serviceable feel-good that places the relationship in a broader family dynamic. The players here are all high quality. Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon are professionals putting on a good show, and they have more chemistry then I would have guessed. Jimmy Tatro who plays one of the grooms, Keyla Monterroso Mejia who plays one of the bridesmaids/wedding planners, and Vinny Thomas, who plays Margot’s assistant, all bring energy and life to the script. And it’s clear that it’s being helmed by a steady hand, Nicholas Stoller, who has built a career on raunchy middle-of-the-road comedies of decreasing quality. And I’d say, of his films, this one is really only better than “Storks” or maybe “Neighbors 2.”  Weak Writing and Cultural Commentary The movie lacks any real zest or inspiration. It’s not unfunny, I just can’t imagine remembering any of the jokes in a few days. And while the film spends a lot of time trying to make fun of woke-scolds, the film also seems too scared of them for these jokes to ever really work.   The bigger problem is that the entire film is drenched in profanity. It’s as though someone wrote a perfectly fine middle-of-the-road rom-com. The studio said it needed to be ten minutes longer, so they decided to add ten minutes of F words.  They are pointless and degrading, and makes what is otherwise a fine if uninspiring film one that is decidedly worth avoiding.  The film is also a bit of a window into how culture views marriage, and it’s not all inspiring. The film concludes that a couple who dated for several years through college, and is happy moving in together across the country, with stable jobs, are better off getting their marriage annulled because marriage is just such a big step.  This film also continues the trend of promoting family reconciliation by processing psychological trauma, by blaming whatever generation is older than whoever wrote the movie. It’s long been a trope to blame the parents, but now we’re reconciling with the parents by blaming the grandparents. “Encanto” did it well, but the new variation of the trope is already starting to wear thin. I think the only people who will truly love this film are those who buy in to the Witherspoon-Ferrell chemistry so much they are willing to watch it go anywhere. I wouldn’t watch this movie with children.  One and a half out of five stars. “You’re Cordially Invited” releases on Amazon Prime on January 30, 2025. Related Articles  In Pursuit of the Perfect Family Movie Heretic in Real Life: A Missionary’s True Story of Survival and Faith Is There Anyone Who Shouldn’t Watch “Rule Breakers”? Public Square Magazine Film of the Year: Corpus Christi