A Man and Woman Embracing Each Other | How Does Pride Affect Relationships | The Toxic Effect of Pride in Marriages

The Poison of Arrogant Pride in Marriage … and the Antidote

Marital success hinges on humility over pride, with faith playing a key role in relationship harmony.

Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is centered on the relationship of Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy as it develops from pride, arrogance, and misunderstanding to love, sacrifice, and appreciation. What was the key ingredient that allowed this relational transformation to take place? As the plot unfolds, both Elizabeth and Darcy encounter experiences that encourage and invite them both to develop personal humility. Though they are not married for most of the book, we learn much from these characters about how the poison of pride, and later the helping and healing quality of humility, can affect a couple’s relationship.

As part of our American Families of Faith research project, we have conducted interviews with more than 250 highly religious married couples and have explored how their faith reportedly impacts their family life. These imperfect but exemplary married couples are devoted to various religions and come from diverse racial, ethnic, and regional backgrounds. When asked, “What are the greatest obstacles, either external or internal, to your marriage?”—many couples responded with answers that involved the poison of pride. 

When asked about the “greatest obstacles” to his marriage, a Catholic husband named Javier (all names are pseudonyms) responded with just one word: “Pride.” When a Native American Methodist husband named Anoki was asked the same question, he said, “The obstacles? They’re the same obstacles that every Christian has, and that’s pride and greed and thinking of one’s self.” Linda, Anoki’s wife of about 20 years, responded, “It’s the same. I agree, [pride is the problem].” An Evangelical Christian husband named Mark identified the same relational enemy:

I think the inherent imperfections that we all have get in the way…. I lean probably more toward pride than I should, and that gets in the way. 

Stephen, a Latter-day Saint husband, spoke of pride as the “great divider” in his marriage:

When you’re angry, [you] say things that you don’t mean. But you say them to [cause] hurt because you’re angry and hurt. Unfortunately, I’m guilty of that. She claims she has a short memory, but I think because of the love, she knows I didn’t mean the things I said…. I say, ‘I’m sorry.’ Most people aren’t willing to say they were wrong. In most arguments we had, [when we see] the other [person] is willing to say sorry, it eases the tension. And the other person sees, ‘[Hey] … I’m also at fault.’ But for [my wife], genuinely, when I say, ‘I’m sorry,’ it’s gone, and it’s forgotten. [Her humility and forgiveness provide] a key. 

Stephen then continued,

I think pride is the great divider. There have been times where my pride has been the focus of my life, and it makes our marriage more difficult. But when I focus on [lightening] her burdens, that’s when it seems to be better.

Responses from both wives and husbands frequently recognized pride as a stumbling block for marital connection and peace. Spontaneously (without being asked about either pride or its antidote), participants repeatedly noted humility as the countermeasure of pride. An immigrant Chinese Christian couple discussed the blessings of choosing humility over pride.

 Jing (husband): When we are humble and regard [ourselves] as imperfect, we can

tolerate each other. If you are pride[ful] and look down on the other [person], you will 

have a bad relationship. When you are near to God, you will see that you are imperfect.

 

Yaxin (wife): Sometimes I pray to God to ask for a good marital relationship. Sometimes 

I don’t know my weakness, but [God] may see my weakness.

 

Jing: I may not listen to my wife. [But] I may change when I know I am wrong in my 

heart, [and God’s] voice in my heart reminds me to repent.

 

Yaxin: Sometimes you [are] numb. You needed to be reminded.

 A Black Baptist husband named Ty discussed the healing process of moving past pride with a humble and sincere apology. He said,

Learn to apologize quickly…. I always remember that [my wife’s] on my side. She’s my advocate…. So, if I did wrong … [I need to] get over … pride, get over our individual [need] about being right all the time. Let’s go ahead and admit when you are wrong and be willing to move on.

Participants repeatedly reported that in marital relationships, the “great divider of pride” can cancerously feed selfishness while preventing healthy conflict resolution—and stunting or damaging relational trust. Participants also reported that certain sacred religious beliefs and a sense of closeness or relationship with God influenced their perception of the value and importance of humility in their relationships. 

A Hispanic Catholic wife, Alisia, reported that her religious belief of focusing on “the other” in marriage has helped her and her husband Juan learn humility together. She said,

We learned not to be selfish [but to] be humble [a]nd caring for the other, and giving. [T]hese [are the experiences] where I think, even though I think it’s very difficult sometimes to solve [it all] … [o]ne of the messages that I remember was [love] “the other.” It’s not [so] much about your needs, but what is it you can do for others. I think it’s part of our religious foundation.

Likewise, Danielle, a Christian Scientist wife, observed that religious beliefs put in action lead to a successful marriage. She said,

Religion is not only theology [and] what you think about God. It’s also the Sermon on the Mount. Are you being meek? Are you being forgiving? Are you being kind? If you really live the Sermon on the Mount, that’s all you need for a successful marriage.

Stuart, a Latter-day Saint husband, similarly reflected: 

I think that when I am closer to God, I’m more humble and less selfish. I … keep going back to those [sacred] things…. I think that when I’m more that way, our [marital] relationship is better. I’m more humble, more teachable.

An Asian American Christian husband similarly recognized humility as the source of lower levels of conflict in his marriage. He reported, “We have no big conflicts. If we respect each other and are humble, we will be able to avoid many conflicts. We should forgive each other.”

An Irish Catholic husband named Patrick spoke of his wife’s example of humility (and other attributes), “She’s been such an example of humility and meekness and beauty and grace and strength and truth—and [she’s] put up with me the whole time.” 

Orlando, a Black Christian husband, also praised his wife’s character, “She kept me strong, kept me focused, and kept me humble, and I thank God for her.” 

Bekah, a Jewish wife, similarly described her husband Saul’s humility and how his example strengthened their marriage. She said,

I think one of the strong points of Judaism is the sense of personal responsibility, and certainly, in any conflict we’ve had, it’s been really important to own up to whatever part we have in the conflict. And that’s something that comes straight from Judaism, … [the] thought of ‘Did I do something wrong? And if so, I need to fix it and apologize for it.’ As opposed to just, ‘Well, it’ll go away, forget about it.’ And that’s one of the things that I really admire about Saul is that he will always apologize. He will always say, ‘I’m wrong.’ I talk to a lot of friends who say, ‘My husband never says he’s sorry. He’ll do nice things, he’ll go on from there, but he’ll never say he’s sorry.’ I think Saul was raised with a sense of ownership for what he’s done, and so I try to learn from him.

Based on our interviews with these families, we have observed, “Our behavior is permission to others to behave similarly, but it is more than that … it is an invitation to do so.” These latter excerpts demonstrate how spouses’ positive examples of humility, apologizing, and expelling the poison of pride can inspire their partners to do likewise. 

In conclusion, humility is an essential relational characteristic for marital success. Many of the couples we interviewed reported that humility helped in conflict resolution, promoted mutual respect, and encouraged both spouses to try and do better in areas of weakness. 

Research demonstrates that the advantages of humility are greatest when both spouses in a marriage make an effort to develop this vital virtue. Our research also demonstrates that a family member’s willingness to be humble and admit mistakes helps encourage relational reconciliation.

Like Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy, our participants demonstrated that as pride is replaced with humility and a deepened awareness of the other person, relationships find greater connection and peace.

About the authors

Loren Marks

Loren D. Marks, Ph.D. is professor of Family Life at BYU, co-director of the American Families of Faith project, and co-author of Psychology of Religion and Families. He is a Fellow at the Wheatley Institute.

David Dollahite

David C. Dollahite, Ph.D., is professor of Family Life at BYU, co-director of the American Families of Faith project, and co-author of Strengths in Diverse Families of Faith.

Laura McKeighen

Laura McKeighen is the Outreach Director for the American Families of Faith Project.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Mother Figurine Holding a Baby | Public Square Magazine | Meaning of the Lyrics Peace on Earth, Goodwill to Men

Now is the Time for Peace on Earth, Goodwill to Men

You’ve heard it before: “Peace on earth, goodwill to men.” Whether viewed as prophecy for a hopeful future, as rebuke to a fallen world, or as the deep aspiration of many human hearts, these words invoke wonder still today, especially at a time like 2020. I believe these words point towards legitimate reasons for great hope in humanity’s future, even in the midst of our current distress. A closer look at their meaning provides a glimpse into bright possibilities. The modern-day enshrinement of these words was penned by the hand of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow during a time of deep personal sadness and grief in his 1863 poem “Christmas Bells.” Subsequently, these words have been sung by millions as the hymn “I Heard The Bells On Christmas Day.” Sadly, few choirs will sing this popular carol during the Christmas season this year as many of our most cherished traditions are disrupted by the continuing, unprecedented epidemic.  Notwithstanding the familiarity of these words in the modern context, their first recorded rendering came anciently in a most unusual setting. It was one of the few instances in all of secular or religious writings where an entire host of heavenly beings—angels—came to deliver a message to a few lucky ones on earth. Their entire message as recorded in Luke 2:14 of the New Testament was “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” If there was more to the message or not, we don’t know. But this was the message that was recorded and handed down over thousands of years since that momentous event.  It was this short heavenly song of praise that Longfellow was referring to when he lamented that “hate is strong and mocks the song of peace on earth goodwill to men.” Then as now, we join Longfellow in observing a world stricken with contention, tragic death, and human suffering with no clear end in sight. As a bold counterpoint, however, his poem and the hymn conclude with a resounding proclamation of hope that indeed there will be yet “peace on earth and goodwill to men.” Is it possible to find for ourselves this same hope of which Longfellow wrote so long ago?    Some might assume that the author had somehow arrived at more pleasant circumstances and material conditions. Yet in describing his world that Christmas morning in 1863, Longfellow was feeling the weight of personal tragedy in the death of his wife and the strife of a hot civil war spreading devastating carnage across the land. In such a heavy time, he couldn’t help but underscore how much the surrounding hate he saw in the world seemed to mock the idea of peace and goodwill – a word that suggests to “tease or laugh at in a scornful or contemptuous manner.” The hate he was referring to, and which has the power to infect us in our own day, was between groups of people and between individuals who looked at each other with scorn and contempt. In an environment that fosters hate, any suggestion that feelings of scorn and contempt might be replaced with feelings of peace and goodwill can seem to be almost laughable (another reason it’s powerful to have a heavenly host delivering this message to the world).   We sometimes think of peace and goodwill as synonyms. They are not. In fact, they represent very different human conditions – either one by itself being incomplete. But together they weave a social fabric of heavenly dimensions. There are many examples of one without the other, but relatively few of both existing and being sustained for any great length of time.  In its simplest form, peace could be defined as the absence of conflict. When this kind of peace is voluntary, due to an underlying feeling of goodwill toward all, it is a wonderfully satisfying human condition.  However, a “peaceful” absence of conflict can also be achieved through coercion, even in the notable absence of goodwill. In that case, it comes at the obvious, and dear price of freedom and liberty and represents a most cruel form of the human condition. Coerced peace is usually a political construct as it requires overwhelming use of force to constrain human behaviors. There have been modern examples of peace without goodwill in the recent past. One can reflect on Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, and other nations. For example, Yugoslavia was created after World War II as a federation of six different ethnic regions. A strong central governing party ensured that conflicts were resolved emphatically and quickly. There was “peace,” but without the underlying goodwill among the different ethnic groups. Under Josip Broz Tito the country experienced an extended period of prosperity characterized by enforced peaceful interaction among the various ethnic groups. In many ways, it was considered a model of economic success.  But after Tito died in 1980, the ability to continue the peaceful climate through coercive means declined, and the unresolved conflicts among the different ethnic groups emerged with frightening consequences in human suffering for the whole country and region. In a relatively few years, the region completely lost both its peace and prosperity.  Similar events have unfolded in other countries where peace was enforced despite the absence of “goodwill toward men.” As the power to enforce coercive peace diminishes, people are subsequently often subjected to tragic suffering that can take decades and even generations to overcome to a point of regaining a semblance of stability. In short, peace without goodwill has a terrible historical record for producing great human suffering in the end.  Unlike “peaceful” conflict suppression, goodwill to men cannot be coerced. It is almost by definition an innate feeling of each individual human heart. It can be contagious, and it often seems to be either in large supply or in short supply in a particular family, community, or nation. It would seem that goodwill to other human beings is something that would be a universal good. However, once again we find that

Remembering the Bible

If we write off the Bible as irrelevant, we lose its proposals on meaning, purpose and self-worth. Other widely embraced answers, however, are despairing. 

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This