adult child

The Healing Power of Humility in Parent-Child Relationships

Lots of families are hurting—with plenty of strained relationships between parents and children. Could a little more humility help us all?

In a memorable address entitled Beware of Pride, former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and religious leader President Ezra Taft Benson stated, “Pride adversely affects all our relationships—our relationship with God and His servants, between husband and wife, parent and child.” In what follows, we explore more closely the evidence in family narratives that demonstrates the healing force of humility to combat the stumbling block of pride in parent-child relationships.

We have had the honor of interviewing more than 200 highly religious and ethnically diverse families of various faiths as part of the American Families of Faith Project. The research article from which this essay draws was published in the Journal of Family Psychology and was co-authored with two of our former graduate students, Joe Chelladurai and Heather Kelley.

From women, men, and children, across denominations and races, we found that various expressions of arrogance and pride were commonly identified as enemies of connection and peace in families. Conversely, humility in family relationships was repeatedly reported to be deeply helpful—consistent with President Benson identifying humility as an “antidote for pride.”

Although no American Families of Faith Project interview questions directly asked about humility, many participants reported that humility (1) aided family members in avoiding and resolving conflict, (2) encouraged mutual respect, and (3) softened parent-child relationships. A 14-year-old Orthodox Christian daughter named Lindsay (all participant names are pseudonyms) explained that increased humility lessened conflicts in her family life. As she put it:

I think I was kind of moving into a danger zone last year [as a] preteen … But I went off, and I spent 6 weeks at a monastery, and it was just a whole different [experience]. It was really a change for me. I learned a lot about just being obedient and humble and submissive. It helps to solve a lot of problems and you end up with a lot less conflict in the family. I came back and I was just different, I think.

A Christian mother named Julie also related that humility helps with relational repair after phases of dysfunction in her family. As she said:

Well, I think we try to be pretty respectful of one another, and when that breaks down, then we feel hurt, and then we get into our dysfunctional phase . . . . [I]t doesn’t last long, though, because I think every one of us has enough of humility and conscience that we will try to repair that. And whether we say a prayer . . . or whether we just take some time and blow off steam and go off . . . separate [while we cool down], then the tension doesn’t last long. We try to repair that. But I think that our faith is what [helps] that [repairing to happen].

In a previously published work drawing from American Families of Faith interviews, we detected what we call the principle of “lived invitation,” stating there: “Our behavior is permission to others to behave similarly . . . but it is more than that. It is an invitation to do so” (Marks & Dollahite, 2017). This principle of lived invitation was reflected and exemplified time and again as participants spoke of humility since the example of a humble parent invites the child to be humble, and the example of a humble child invites the parent to be humble as well. A Baptist husband named John observed that his daughters’ examples of “softness and gentleness” invited him to be humbler, saying, “Sometimes I’ve been hard-hearted, and then the softness and gentleness of one of my daughters . . . cause me to break.”

Parents also mentioned the importance of teaching humility to their children. Many parents expressed that humility is an essential value and encouraged their children to be considerate of others. An Arab American Muslim father described parent-child discussions focused on humility, saying:

I told [my children] . . . be very modest, very humble, because what you have is not because you deserve it but because God gave [it to you in His mercy], and a lot of people work but they don’t get these things . . . . [Gratitude and humility] are values in our family.

Jiang, an Asian American Christian father, shared that one way he and his wife teach humility in their home is through discussions about money and frugality. He said:

It’s humbleness [that matters]. They form their own ideas and habits from their experience. We try to correct them, for example, their opinion on money. Sometimes they ask me if we are poor or rich . . . . I said, “We are not so poor and not so rich. Some people are poorer than us. Some people are richer.” . . . I teach them to be frugal.

In addition to the importance of teaching humility to their children, several parents reported that the responsibility of sharing their faith with their children was humbling when their own flaws and weaknesses were evident. This sense of humility prompted many parents to view parenting as a significant and holy lifework. An Orthodox Jewish father named Saul said:

I admit I am not . . . I have been far from perfect as a parent myself because I think we’re human . . . . [We try] not come across too dogmatic or doctrinaire. [It is important that we] have the sense of humility within [our religious tradition], without sounding [prideful or arrogant]. I mean . . . there can be a fine line.

An Irish/Italian Catholic couple named Brian and Angela discussed the complex nature of humility. They explained that humility allowed them to see their flaws, and it simultaneously enabled them to try and be better. Humility enabled them to mold their children, and it allowed their children to mold them in return. The father, Brian, reflected:

I think there’s no other job that I can imagine that’s been as humbling as being a parent. I realize all of my flaws only too well. And I’m reminded of them in appropriate ways . . . and my failings as a parent. But, it helps me grow . . . God . . . loved us while we were sinners, and [He is] trying to mold us.

His wife Angela added:

To echo that, humility [is something] you learn as a parent. It’s a very common[ly] held understanding that . . . parents mold their children . . . [but] the longer I’m a mother, the more I realize my children mold me to a different person . . . than I would have been if I hadn’t had children. And that’s humbling, and that’s good.

Nearly all major religions warn of pride and promote the virtue of humility. It’s no surprise that many of the highly religious mothers, fathers, and youth we interviewed suggested that pride and arrogance are obstacles to a flourishing parent-child relationship. They also agreed that when both children and parents choose humility, relationships will find greater connection and harmony, and relational repair, commitment, and trust will likely develop—consistent with studies by two other research teams (Farrell et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017).

Our final narrative related to humility comes not from our interviews but from the university classroom. Seven years ago, during a discussion related to humility and forgiveness, one of our students raised her hand and said, “There is one thing that parents can do that God cannot do.” That immediately captured the attention of those present before she then explained, “A parent can model how to quickly and sincerely apologize to their child when they are wrong.” Indeed.

Ezra Taft Benson warned, “[Pride] in our families drives the Spirit of the Lord away. It also drives many of our family members away.” As parents look for ways to improve their relationships with their children, we would be wise to consider the relational powerhouse of humility as a strong antidote to the stumbling block of pride.

About the authors

Laura McKeighen

Laura McKeighen is the Outreach Director for the American Families of Faith Project.

David Dollahite

David C. Dollahite, Ph.D., is professor of Family Life at BYU, co-director of the American Families of Faith project, and co-author of Strengths in Diverse Families of Faith.

Loren Marks

Loren D. Marks, Ph.D. is professor of Family Life at BYU, co-director of the American Families of Faith project, and co-author of Psychology of Religion and Families. He is a Fellow at the Wheatley Institute.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 3 Discussion and What’s True?

Summary – The episode opens with Detective Pyre leading a group of officers up the mountain to rescue Taba, who is completely fine and sitting on the ground outside one of the cabins. (The episode doesn’t explain how he got there after having a gun pointed at his face at the end of episode 2.) Pyre calls for more backup and finds a little girl wandering in the woods, lost and scared. The officers apprehend her and she tells Pyre about how things function up at the “fort” and about “Uncle Allen and Auntie Brenda” when her mother Sara arrives. Pyre questions Sara about Brenda’s experiences in the temple. The episode then depicts the beginning of an endowment session in a pretty good imitation of the garden room in the Salt Lake Temple. Brenda shares with her sisters-in-law her worries about making a covenant to “surrender” to her husband. One of the signs is shown as well as the penalty motion. Sara claims the end of the world is nigh, that her husband Sam’s job is to separate the wheat from the tares, and that Brenda was subject to the doctrine of blood atonement. A large squadron of police officers prepares to storm the Lafferty “fort,” when Pyre realizes that the situation resembles the Haun’s Mill Massacre and decides to instead approach unarmed. A wild-looking Sam and his family are taken into custody while one man escapes into the woods.  Meanwhile, Pyre’s mother with dementia is recovered after she wandered out during the twin’s birthday party. We see a flashback to Father Lafferty confronting Dan about refusing to pay taxes and beating him with his belt. The next day, Dan receives a “revelation” that he is the rightful leader of the family. In the present, Pyre and his wife take the girls to their baptismal interview with their bishop, and Pyre stays behind to discuss his mother’s health with the bishop. He also brings up how his current case ties into difficult church history topics, which the bishop encourages him to “put on a shelf.” At home later, Pyre and his wife fight about whether to postpone the girls’ baptism until after the case is closed.  At the police station, Sam Lafferty is ranting and raving. Pyre corners Allen about his criminal record due to unpaid parking tickets. He shares how his brothers pressured him into it, and as a result, he was arrested and missed Brenda’s graduation from BYU. Brenda’s anger about this led her to confront Dan about his beliefs (which involve a lot of strange reasoning about the constitution and separation of powers), and during the confrontation, Dan reveals his plan to run for sheriff and eventually pull down most government institutions from the inside. Allen ties this story to Brigham Young encouraging Joseph Smith to fight persecution, but Allen says he made a deal with Brenda that he would leave their influence if she gave up her career to start a family.  Pyre and Tab interrogate Sam Lafferty, who claims to be the Lord’s destroying angel, murdering those who are on his “holy list.” Robin Lafferty, still in custody, overhears Sam’s rants and demands to know if Brenda and her daughter are okay. Pyre shows him pictures of their deaths and Robin breaks, revealing that the Lafferty’s are likely also planning an attack on their bishop and stake president, who tried to stop their apostasy. Flashback to Brenda finding out she is pregnant and deciding to try to help the Lafferty family back onto the path of the mainstream church. Church History – This episode has a violent depiction of the Haun’s Mill Massacre, which most members will readily recognize. Less well known is the obscure early church concept of blood atonement, which the Lafferty’s appear to believe is still in force and to be enacted by them. Allen also pins violence in the early church on Brigham Young’s influence on Joseph Smith, with Emma Smith being against it. This neatly parallels the Lafferty situation, but it’s a significant simplification of the complex web of influences and responses to constant violence against the early Saints. We also get a mention of Joseph Smith running for president, which from my understanding he mostly did to draw attention to the plight of the church rather than expecting to win and reform the government. The show also alludes to the alleged assassination attempt on Governor Boggs by Porter Rockwell. Shibboleths – Sara Lafferty asks Pyre if he “follows his covenants.” This phrasing is off: LDS members would say “keep your covenants” or “honor your covenants.” (A search for the phrase “follow the covenants” on the church website yields only one result.) In the temple, Robin’s wife remarks on the importance of “keeping our agency strong,” another formulation that makes no sense. To Latter-day Saints, agency means the God-given ability to choose. This isn’t something we can strengthen, but an inherent condition of mortality. During their fight, Sister Pyre worries that delaying the baptism will shame her in front of their “congregation.” Members would never use this word, especially in private. We exclusively refer to our congregation as a “ward.” Her concern about people wondering if her daughters “failed” their interview seems off as well. Finally, let’s talk about LDS family size. Several times in this episode we get references to “at least 10” or “dozens” of kids as though this is the typical size of an LDS family. But in actuality, in 1980, only 12% of Utahns had a family of 6 people or more, and only a fraction of that 12% would have 10+ children. The wards I have lived in have maybe one family that has more than 5 kids. It’s just not that typical. I Don’t Love to See the Temple – Alright, here we are at the biggest controversy of the series: the decision to portray sacred temple ordinances. The temple scene takes place from timestamp 14:00 to 17:00. Only three minutes long, yet

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This