Hardenstein_2014_-_Ready_for_Battle (1)

Live Action Role Playing and Sacred Symbolic Pedagogy

Latter-day Saints aren’t the only ones reenacting transcendent stories through symbolic, experiential pedagogy. But we may be unique in relishing these stories as God’s exalting truth.

My friend recently went off to participate in a “larping” festival, hosted at a picturesque castle overseas. She was a bit embarrassed to share the news about her tripprompting my wife and me to look up more about “Live Action Role-Playing” (LARP) to understand more about what it was.    

Inspired by popular fiction novels and table-top role-playing games, people began in the 1970s physically embodying certain characters in various fictional or symbolic settings, complete with elaborate venues and costumes. Rather than just enjoying a popular fantasy novel or movieor dressing up as a Cosplay character at a Comicon convention—this is about joining together with others to recreate key elements of a popular narrative with others who appreciate the same story.   

Although most LARPs are experienced as games for entertainment or artistic expression, they are also used for educational purposes. Bringing together roleplay simulations, improvisational theater, psychodrama, battle simulations, and historical reenactment, these immersive experiences can generate powerful insights for participants.  

None of this would be strange to many of my therapist friends, who regularly employ psychodrama, symbolic roleplay, and different imagery/visualization exercises and thought experiments to help teach people grappling with life challengescreatively nudging their clients’ minds and hearts to a better place. Neither would any of this be so unusual to any who have participated in or witnessed other live-action reenactments, from the long history of American civil war reenactments to the more recent tradition of “Pioneer Trek” among youth in the Church of Jesus Christ. 

Civil war reenactment at Kennekuk County Park, near Danville, Illinois (Daniel Schwen)

“Weird because it’s so different.” Yet especially when it comes to some of the more unfamiliar live-action role-play scenarios, there can be some worry among participants at the perception of being involved. “LARP has a branding problem,” my friend told me“it’s just mostly seen as weird by others who don’t understand the motives and purpose of the event.” 

That felt all too familiar to public perception of our own worship experiences in temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This last week, many strangers have been gawking at a popular media production dramatizing the symbolic worship experience in these sacred temples. Although producers of the show have gushed and been praised for their attention to “exquisite detail” of certain theatrical elements, the overall message to viewers (not including me—who cannot stomach it), is one of profound misrepresentation—portraying the day-to-day worship and religious life of millions of Latter-day Saints, as strange, foreign, and to be regarded with suspicion.

This is a wounding experience for many saints, especially when it comes to our temple experiencesto have something they cherish as sacred held up as a frightening spectacle for all the world to view. But as scholar Daniel Peterson notes, this can also potentially become an opportunity for clarification.

The celestial room has an “ancient counterpart” in the “holy of holies” within Israelite temples.

Certainly, the idea that things of a spiritual and symbolic nature can be confusing to the unfamiliar is not new. The apostle Paul acknowledged in his letters to Corinth that “the preaching of the cross” is “foolishness” to those who do not understand itlater explaining that these things cannot be quickly known “because they are spiritually discerned.” Jesus himself explained to confused disciples that he taught in symbolic parables precisely so that people would not be able to see what they are not ready to see.

Of course, religious communities throughout the ages have reinforced truth figuratively through sacred ritual. From the Eucharist and holy supper of communion or “sacrament,” to passion plays and the experiential enactment intrinsic to Easter week itself, people of faith the world over continue to reach in these transcendent experiences for larger insights and meaning that are surprisingly relevant to the messy realities of modern life.

Yet the value of all this remains largely indecipherable to many secular minds. And that makes sense. I wouldn’t expect unfamiliar strangers or friends to understand my own experiences in the temple, certainly not assisted by filmmakers whose entire production manifests hostile bias towards a Church many of them have already rejected. But I would hope these friends would not only recognize this biasbut hear out those of us with more direct “lived experience” of these realities. 

Describing the indescribable.  For my wife and I, even amidst the turmoil of caring for a brain-injured, sweet baby girl, we credit so much of the unusual peace, joy, and power we have received as a family to what we’ve experienced in the temple. It’s not a literary overstatement to say the learning, strength, and comfort experienced there has changed everything about our home, our marriage, and our lives.  

If Latter-day Saints like me speak vaguely about their experiences inside, it’s not out of fear or embarrassment, like some involved in LARPing. It’s out of deep respect and love for something beautiful. In the age of heightened angst around privacy and confidentiality, you would think that kind of concern would be intuitive and immediately appreciated.  

But even with incessant secular demands that boundaries be respected for a diverse range of experiences today, too often sacred ceremonies and rituals are instead held up for mockery and lampooningwhich ridicule would be shocking in many other arenas.  

Yet once again, maybe this is an opportunity for people of faith to better explain themselves in a language we are more comfortable with, and in a way that can hopefully help people make some connections. For instance, similar to some other live, experiential role-play events, we also wear different clothing in temples that is plain, white, and which figures meaningfully in the enactment of the transcendent gospel story.  

The difference for us is we believe this story to be true. Although our temple enactments are thoroughly symbolic, they point our minds and hearts towards the reality of why we are here, what we are facing in this life, and where we aspire to be in the future. As President M. Russell Ballard told a group of reporters touring the Draper Utah temple prior to its dedication as they neared the Celestial Room—this is “like walking in, as close as we know how to depict it, into the presence of God.”

Celestial Room in the Payson, Utah Temple (churchofjesuschrist.org)

That celestial room, according to scholar Amy Hardison, has an “ancient counterpart” in the “holy of holies” within Israelite templeswhere only one high priest could enter the sanctuary each year on the Day of Atonement. The other parts of this earlier temple experience also involved various barriers and passageways that could only be accessed by limited groups of people. By contrast, lawyer Daniel Ortner points out, thanks to the rending of the veil in Christ’s crucifixion, “in our day and in our temples each and every attendee can boldly go through the veil of the temple and enter into the symbolic presence of God.”

There is profound comfort, reassurance, connection, and sense of belonging that come from this experience. But there is also an expansion of knowledge and insight that, in our experience, doesn’t stop. While the manner of immersive education can seem strange to those primarily accustomed to book-learning, this kind of experiential education can be thrilling, perhaps especially to those who appreciate the distinctive power of “live-action role-playing.”

Elder John Widtsoe called temple instruction a “wonderful pedagogy” that was uniquely appealing to him as a professional educator. In addition to careful presentation through spoken word, as we are all used to in a classroom, he emphasized the focus in temples on “representations by living, moving beings, and by pictorial representations in the wonderfully decorated rooms.”

“Every attendee can boldly go through the veil of the temple and enter into the symbolic presence of God.”

However foreign this might seem to modern minds, it’s been life-changing to those of us anxious to find something richer and deeper than often superficial modernity to guide our steps.

The greatest adventure of all. Two days ago, Matt and Brittney Maughan entered the castle-like Logan temple to divinely bless their love and marriage, after many years of fighting for both their faith and their family. They could have followed the inertia of secular societywalking away from any such commitmentbut against all odds, they kept reaching for something higher.   

And they found it. Divine power flowing into their home. And an accompanying story about their lives and their future that has been transforming their home as they’ve been living out that understanding as best they can. If you piece together the many images throughout scripture, you start to glimpse a story of storiesa mighty narrative that believers relish as underpinnings of “things as they really are” (and “as they really will be”).  It goes something like this:

Once upon a time, we all started from a place of relative innocence. Much like Adam and Eve in the garden, we begin fresh, clean, and bright-eyedas children.  Untilwell, you know what. Until everything else happens: the aching realizations that hit us all growing up. The heartache. And betrayal. The feeling used. And being abused (for way too many)The neglect. And loneliness. The grief. And anger.  The sorrow. And anxiety. Addictions and agonies. Despairs and darkness. Emptiness and numbness.  

All of this is both enormously difficult and entirely anticipated within a Christian narrative where the human family has to face a being and his followers represented throughout scripture, among other things, as a predator (a “great dragon,” “that old serpent,” “a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour”)with John channeling a piercing warning in his great Revelation, “Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath.”

All that sounds pretty scary, but don’t stop there, because it’s not how the story ends! Like all great sagas, there is hope on the horizon. Among the many ways that the work of Jesus is described in sacred writ, none is more thrilling than the vivid imagery of a Great Rescuefrom one who “proclaim[ed] liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound.” 

You might blame this on too many Liam Neeson and Mel Gibson movies (and Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Avengers)or perhaps these same movies are symbolically pointing to the same great reality:  our profound need for deliverance and rescue, by someone with everything needed to do the job right.  

Because of Him, check out where the story goes next:    

Illustration by J. Kirk Richards
  • The rescued are washed and cleansed from all the filthiness and rot of their prior dungeon existence.  
  • They are tenderly clothed in new garments of power and beauty.  
  • They are given a new place at a feast with “living water” and “bread of life”—and eventually the “fruit of the tree of life,” representing God’s love and the abundant life of joy and peace given to all his followers.   
  • They are all welcomed into a new home—adopted permanently into a holy family of peace, joy, and love.  
  • And they then go from rescued, to rescuer—with plentiful opportunities to serve and go to work, joining with others to build a kingdom that will one day fill the earth. (Imagine what a difference this alone would and could make to the many millions of people devoid of hope, meaning and purpose in the world—to be able to dive in, roll up their sleeves, and help build this “better world“). 

And when will that better world happen? When the Prince of Peace returns for good. Until then, as C.S. Lewis famously wrote, Christians are like a rebel force living in “enemy-occupied territorythat is what this world is.” And “Christianity is the story of how the rightful king has landed, you might say landed in disguise, and is calling us to take part in a great campaign of sabotage.”

How’s that for a mighty narrative of adventure? Name one imaginary quest or movie saga that beats this one in excitement…little wonder we do all we can to “tell the Father’s story” anywhere we can!

A prince and princess entering the “palace of God.”  The personal realization of this great saga for Latter-day Saints is an ordinance we call a “sealing,” overseen by authority in temples to unite families forever, which reflects the same power that Jesus gave to His apostles. As I witnessed Matt and Brittney committing their hearts and lives together in this sealing ordinance, the energy was otherworldly. Joy and peace filled the room.  

It was nearly impossible to shake the sense that this beautiful familyno matter what they would have to face in the tumultuous days aheadhad just planted its roots on a supernatural foundation, one that not even the “jaws of hell” could shake. All this thanks to what they had just experienced in the “palace of God.” (Scholar Amy Hardison notes that in Hebrew, the word for temple is “Hekal,” which can just as easily be translated as “palace.”)

Like all disciples of Christ, their journey of progression and learning, sanctification, and endowment would be long—but that’s true of anyone embarking on this exalting journey. What an adventure! Matt and Brittney had joined the “kingdom of priests [and priestesses], and an holy nation” described in Exodus—with an indescribably bright future. As we left the castle of the Lord’s house this week, I looked at its ramparts and thought of my other friend, nestled off somewhere by another castle enacting another, very different story than we just did.

And I smiled. 

About the author

Jacob Z. Hess

Jacob Hess is a staff writer and Latter-day Saint Voices editor at Deseret News and publishes longer-form pieces at PublishPeace.net. He co-authored "You're Not as Crazy as I Thought, But You're Still Wrong" and “The Power of Stillness: Mindful Living for Latter-day Saints.” He has a Ph.D. in clinical-community psychology from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
On Key

You Might Also Like

An elected official scolds a colleague in a government chamber, reflecting breakdowns in political leadership and dignity.

The Dignity Deficit

Political disagreement is inevitable; dehumanizing opponents is a choice that weakens us all.

The Supreme Court’s Textualist Temptation

The Supreme Court’s much-anticipated decision in Bostock v Clayton County may in fact tell us more about how courts decide what law is than what law says. It may also serve as an unexpected opportunity for judicial conservatives to move away from textualism and reclaim a more inclusive jurisprudential methodology. For over four decades the legal community has been arguing about first principles for interpreting our laws. In Bostock v Clayton County, a case about LGBTQ rights that the United States Supreme Court will decide this term, the central question involves an interpretation of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, which famously bans discrimination based on race, religion, sex, or national origin. The case is important because it will determine whether discrimination based upon “sexual orientation” is covered by the original prohibition in the statute against discrimination on the basis of “sex.” But the case may actually be more important for the ideas used by the court in how we interpret our laws. The case presents what may well become a textbook example of the application of textualism, and its related concept, originalism, to the interpretation of a landmark statute. Thus from the standpoint of how laws are interpreted, the case is fraught with meaning and symbolism.  That argument will take center stage in a highly ironic way. Judicial liberals will be arguing for textualism (typically the conservative position) and conservatives will be arguing for a much more broadly based contextual understanding (usually the liberal position). From my perspective as a judicial conservative, this is an opportunity to restore textualism to its traditional place in jurisprudence, which could also have the added benefit of reducing the tension between textualism and originalism, something that has received too little attention from conservatives. To understand the debate, some brief history is necessary.  Textualism, Orginalism, and the Rise of Judicial Activism For many decades the main complaint of conservatives focused on “judicial activism”—the idea that courts are reading into the language of our laws certain policies that the framers or the legislators did not address. This is typically done by using arguments based upon fairness, equality, and broad readings of the purpose of the language in question. Doing so, conservatives, argued, was to subvert democratic decision-making and turn republican government into rule by the judiciary. This further tends to foreclose the discussion, debate, give and take, and compromise that will address all the related implications of the decision. To deal with their concerns, many judicial conservatives argued for increased reliance on two particular methods of interpretation: originalism and textualism. Textualism focuses on the literal words being interpreted, their grammatical meaning and their dictionary definition, and largely, although not entirely, ignores other considerations if the meaning of the words is thought to be clear. Originalism focuses on the meaning of the words as they were understood at the time, usually in the sense of how they would have been understood by the public. Neither method was new, but various champions of these concepts who emphasized their application (particularly when it came to constitutional questions), rose to prominence. Several of them are now on the United States Supreme Court. The late Justice Antonin Scalia was especially associated with textualism, and current Justice Gorsuch has publicly associated himself with this same approach Scalia favored. Justice Thomas is a devoted originalist; and Justice Alito is sympathetic to both originalism and textualism. On the other hand, the so-called “liberals” on the court are much more in tune with what former Justice William Brennan called “living constitutionalism.” That approach takes the position that many of the provisions of constitutions are intended to have broad and evolving meanings. They are generally in favor of giving preference to judicially developed ideas of fairness, equality, and policy considerations that they believe are appropriate for the current times and circumstances. While not rejecting the ideas of originalism or textualism out of hand, they view the usual application of those concepts as too narrow —insisting that other approaches should be given equal or more weight, depending on the circumstances. In this way, what others might argue is plain, they often find ambiguous. It’s also the case that many of the tools that they would apply are broadly accepted by judicial conservatives and liberals alike, such as looking at the structure and purpose of the law, and related statutes, as well as somewhat more controversial but commonly used methods such as legislative history, or even weighing the consequences of a decision. By contrast, originalism emphasizes the long understood idea that a written constitution by definition was constructed by its framers to have fixed meaning. Constitutions provide for a means of amendment, and that process implicitly confirms that what was not amended should be understood as unchanged. The bedrock idea is that a constitution represents the will of the people, freely adopted by both representation and ratification, and not imposed by any other means. Although statutes can be freely changed by the legislature, originalists insist they should have the meaning that they had when enacted. This straightforward concept is eroded, however, by two hundred years of change, some obvious and some, as the great historian Gibbon would have said “insensible”—happening so gradually and imperceptibly that most hardly even noticed it. Major events like the Civil War and the amendments to the Constitution that it generated, introduced broadened concepts of due process and equal protection to the constitutional text and our way of thinking about laws more generally. The massive economic growth of the country also generated different ways of thinking about commerce, and how the state regulates behavior through a huge administrative process.  Together with these developments, a growing body of legal academics began to emphasize various sophisticated issues, such as the potential elasticity of some of the language of law, arguing that standards such as “cruel and unusual punishment” were intended to have an evolving meaning, not one fixed for all time unless amended. Finally, as judges and scholars have noted for over 150

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!