A young woman’s visible faith message on her clothing reflects public devotion and Mormon church growth.

Faith on Their Sleeves: How Christian Merch Signals a Generational Return to Belief

Is there actually a quiet comeback to religion? Faith is showing up on hoodies, playlists, and TikTok, challenging the narrative that religion is dead.

Download Print-Friendly Version

Christian Smith’s new book, Why Religion Went Obsolete, tells the depressing tale of traditional religion’s decline in America. A believer himself, Smith notes that each of the last six generations has been less observant than the one that came before. Only about 19% of Gen Z (born 1997-2012) report having a “strong” or “somewhat strong” affiliation with their religion, less than half of some older generations. Smith notes that traditional religion strikes many young people not just as wrong but as strange, outdated, and unnecessary. In a world with so many options, why spend your time or attention on religion? 

But perhaps traditional religion isn’t quite dead. Witness the curious rise of what I’ll call “Christian Merch” — clothing, accessories, and public displays that openly reference Christian symbols or themes. In my travels, I’ve noticed more wearing of cross necklaces than ever before, sweatshirts with messages like “God is Good” and “Be the Light,” backpacks adorned with turquoise ichthys symbols, and TikTok influencers filming GRWM (“get ready with me”) reels while casually sporting faith-based apparel. Am I simply noticing it more, a frequency illusion—or is there actually more of it to see? If the latter, is Christian Merch a sign that religiosity is making a comeback among young people in America? Is it more performance than conviction—just another way to grab attention? Or is it possible that it’s a little of both?

What may look to some like a surface-level display might actually reflect something far more intentional: a generation prepared to declare their faith?

Emily Belle Freeman, Young Women General President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, seems to suggest that something deeper may be happening. Speaking of today’s rising generation, she observed: “Our youth are unusually gifted in reaching out to others and sharing what they believe in a convincing fashion. These are gifts that you were born with and that you’re here in church learning to develop so that you can be a powerful magnet towards the gathering throughout your life. This is the reason for the timing of your birth. This is the role of the youth of the Church.”

In other words, what may look to some like a surface-level display might actually reflect something far more intentional: a generation prepared to declare their faith in public ways, inviting others, in a fashion uniquely suited to their moment in history.

Wearing Belief—The Rise of Christian Merchandise

History has a way of repeating itself. In the 1970s, another rising generation—caught between the materialism of their parents and the chaos of the sexual revolution—began to visibly separate themselves from the culture around them. The Jesus Movement was born, and with it came a new wave of Christian expression: T-shirts, jewelry, bumper stickers, and patches that declared “Jesus Saves.” The fish symbol became an everyday sign of personal conviction. Historian Colleen McDannell observed that Christian retail flourished during this time, summed up by a 1978 ad that read, “If it’s worth sharing, it’s worth wearing.” From that modest beginning rose the megachurch movement, Contemporary Christian Music, and decades of growing evangelical influence.

Today, a new kind of faith-driven expression is emerging from unexpected places—skateparks, start-ups, and Shopify carts. Joe Pemberton, a software designer and father, launched Nauvoo Supply Co. in 2021 after finding mainstream brands out of step with his values. What began with a minimalist “1830” tee nodding to Latter-day Saint heritage quickly grew into a catalog of over 30 unapologetically faith-rooted designs. For Joe, it’s more than business—it’s a cause. He believes public expressions of belief can spark courage in others, which is why he’s leaned into bold statements like an “Occupy Missouri” tee—a doctrinal riff on Elon Musk’s “Occupy Mars”—and a Family Proclamation line he admits is “brave,” even among the faithful. Sales have doubled annually, but what matters most to Joe is inviting connection and reflection in a world where faith is often countercultural.

The growth is not only real—it’s youth-led and peer-to-peer. While supported by institutions, it’s clearly not driven by them.

Nauvoo Supply doesn’t seem to be an outlier. Brands like Elevated Faith, God Is Dope, and Corinthians Corner have built loyal followings with bestsellers that blend faith and design. At the same time, modest clothing companies like DM Fashion, Main Street Exchange, The Reflective, and Modest Molly boutique are quietly booming—catering not only to conservative Christians, but also to Orthodox Jews and Muslims. Together, they reflect something bigger than a market trend: people want to wear what they believe.

That shift hasn’t gone unnoticed by church leaders. Elder Clark Gilbert, a General Authority Seventy and Commissioner of Education for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has spent considerable time thinking about what he calls a reawakening among the rising generation. “There’s a deeper phenomenon happening, and we think it is the hastening … These young adults are smart, and they’re turning back to religion. They’re turning back to a relationship with Jesus Christ … It’s an amazing thing to behold.” Earlier this year, Gilbert and Elder D. Todd Christofferson shared global data from Church Education programs that shows the growth is not only real—it’s youth-led and peer-to-peer. While supported by institutions, it’s clearly not driven by them. “We see, in a broader way, this happening … in Jewish schools, Catholic schools, Evangelicals, whatever. There is a movement—not quite as dramatic as we are seeing here in the Church Educational System—but it is broad.”

If the youth of the seventies were rejecting materialism and moral confusion, it’s worth asking: what is this rising generation rejecting? And what new spiritual expressions might rise from it?

Music as Merchandise—Faith in the Charts

This cultural shift isn’t limited to what young people wear—unless you include wearing their earbuds.  Music has become another form of spiritual self-expression. Take Forrest Frank, for example, whose 2024 album “Child of God” debuted at No. 1 on Billboard’s Top Christian Albums chart. His breakout song “No Longer Bound” found its way to number 2 on Spotify’s U.S. Viral 50. What seems to be resonating is that Frank is genuinely living what he sings. Josiah Queen topped the same chart with “The Prodigal.” and when Megan Woods released “The Truth,” hers shot to number one.  Lauren Daigle, whose powerful vocals and spiritual themes consistently land her on the Billboard 200—not just the Christian charts—performed at this year’s Super Bowl pre-show, indicating how mainstream faith-infused content has become.  It seems that this raw, faith-centered music, especially when it is more than performative—and delivered by their peers, is mirroring a generational vibe shift.

This same appetite for faith that shows up in music and merch extends to the world of podcasts. According to Edison Research’s Q1 2024 report, the Religion & Spirituality category now ranks ninth among podcast genres in the U.S. for weekly listeners aged 13 and older. Clearly, Gen Z is leaning in: those ages 18–24 make up a growing share of the podcast audience. There is also the success of shows like The Bible in a Year with Fr. Mike Schmitz, which topped Apple’s charts in both 2021 and 2022. Many young people appear to be seeking spiritual insight and connection through platforms they’ve grown up with, and formats that are native to them—streaming faith into their lives one song, one episode at a time.

More Than a Trend: From Statement to Identity

Not everyone sees this trend as a sign of spiritual depth. Some critics argue that faith-themed fashion can veer into performative religion and trivialize sacred belief. There’s a subtle but striking disconnect when a large cross dangles in a plunging neckline, or when Christian slogans are printed on muscle tees alongside aggressive or politically charged symbols that feel out of step with the teachings of Christ. These contradictions raise fair questions: Is this faith, fashion, or a new kind of cultural identity? Whichever, for many, these public signals of belief are sincere entry points into a faith their parents may have neglected or taken for granted.

Young people appear to be seeking spiritual insight and connection through platforms they’ve grown up with, and formats that are native to them—streaming faith into their lives one song, one episode at a time.

What might all this mean—culturally, spiritually? Perhaps something as simple, and as seismic, as the hastening of a rising generation that refuses to keep belief to themselves. For many young people today, Christian merch isn’t just aesthetic—it’s identity. It’s belonging. It’s a way to publicly own belief in a world where symbols matter. They grew up surrounded by flags, filters, and profile bios that signal who we are and what we stand for. Why wouldn’t rising faith join the mix? What some might dismiss as surface-level is actually consistent with broader Gen Z patterns: a craving for authenticity, a resistance to pretense, and a boldness in broadcasting values through image and action. This creates both an opportunity and a challenge for parents, youth leaders, and churches. How do we nurture this impulse—to express, to share, to signal spiritual belonging—without losing reverence at the heart of it?

Importantly, this isn’t just an American moment. Across the UK and Australia, similar shifts are underway. In Australia, reports of rising conversions and Gen Z-led interest in church are challenging narratives of decline. In the UK, many describe a subtle but growing “rebirth” of faith. That conversation may take more than one article. But what’s clear is that something is shifting. Across TikTok feeds, playlists, and hoodies, a vibe shift is unfolding.

Faith is not fading, it’s trending. Baader-Meinhoff Phenomena aside, there is more Christian Merch to see—because more are choosing to be seen.

About the author

Carol Rice

Carol Rice serves as the Director of Communications for Public Square Magazine, a collaborative project of the Elizabeth McCune Foundation. She holds a Master of Arts in Professional Communications and a Bachelor of Arts in Marriage and Family Relations with an emphasis in family advocacy. Carol's work focuses on advancing public discourse around family dynamics, communication, and social issues. She and her husband are parents to five children and reside in Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven: Episode 4, “Church and State”

Summary — The episode begins with the detectives checking in on Bishop Low’s home, which they find ransacked and deserted. Pyre finds a letter written by Ron’s wife to the Prophet expressing concern about her husband’s refusal to pay taxes. The detective contacts the Church about the letter and is told the letter was handed down to one of the bishop’s counselors, LeConte Bascom, who works at the bank. Brother Bascom says he had to turn Ron down for a loan because his brother’s refusal to pay taxes made him a liability, though it’s heavily implied that the real reason is that his wife’s letter was seen as an embarrassment to the Church. In flashbacks, we see Dan marching in a Pioneer Day parade, shouting about the government’s illegal taxes, as well as smoking and kissing a woman who isn’t his wife. Dan’s father says he’s ashamed of his immoral behavior and anti-tax nonsense and advises him to study the scriptures to set himself back on the right path. This unfortunately drives Dan into researching more obscure history of the Church, including information on polygamy.  He makes a business trip down to Colorado City to visit the breakaway polygamist sect there and manages to get the name of a pro-polygamy pamphlet called “The Peace Maker.” He reads this pamphlet and brings up the idea to his wife Matilda, telling her she’s limiting his spiritual power if she doesn’t let him marry a second wife.  During this conversation, Dan is pulled over for speeding and refuses to cooperate with the officer, leading them on a police chase that ends with his arrest. At the jail, Dan’s brothers try to convince him to stop his resistance to the government. Ron feels it’s his responsibility to show Dan the error of his ways, but instead, Dan runs circles around him, leaving him speechless and admitting that he’s going to lose his business and home. Dan somehow turns this fact into evidence that his views are correct and ends up winning over Ron to his side. In the present, Detective Pyre is being leaned on by the Laffertys’ stake president to release them into his custody but refuses. The detectives have identified the car the killers were probably using and plan to hold a press conference to ask for tips when the police chief returns from vacation and demands that all mentions of fundamentalism Mormonism be scrubbed from the press briefing. (It’s implied he’s being leaned on by the Church.) Pyre tries to toe the line at the conference but eventually caves to a persistent reporter and admits that he thinks that the murders may have something to do with fundamentalist beliefs. The next day at church, the ward is shunning the Pyres, and a specific couple is assigned to keep an eye on their faith. Meanwhile, a police officer has located Bishop Low fly fishing in the mountains and safe. Church History — During Dan’s explanation of polygamy, we get flashbacks to the infamous scene where Emma finds out about the doctrine of polygamy for the first time and throws the revelation in the fire. Though church members will be familiar with this story, the tone is portrayed very differently than we are used to. Emma is shown as being absolutely skeptical of Joseph’s translation of the Book of Mormon and other prophetic acts, even though she firmly testified of the truth of these things even after her break with the Church after Joseph was murdered. Joseph is portrayed as proclaiming the doctrine of polygamy only for his own physical gratification, which is a common anti-Mormon trope with little evidence behind it. While it is true that one of Joseph’s wives was only 14, the facts behind the situation are more complex than portrayed in the show. The pamphlet “The Peace Maker” is portrayed by Dan Lafferty as an “essential LDS tract” written by Joseph Smith, and no one in the show ever corrects this perception. In fact, the tract was not written by Joseph Smith, and he repudiated it during his lifetime. This episode presents a slanted view of church history, giving only one side of the conversation and showing the modern church as trying to hush it up rather than having its own interpretation of events. Shibboleths — Pyre claims that writing a letter to the prophet is like writing to “Heavenly Father himself,” which is absolutely wrong. While members of the Church do revere the prophet and listen to his teachings, he is not God, and this equivalency is not one Saints would make (though outsiders think we do). The idea that doing business with fundamentalists is like “doing business with the mafia” is totally alien to me. They are regarded as somewhat of an oddity in Utah, but not dangerous like organized crime. One unusual phrase occurs when the stake president claims that the Laffertys need to be released into his custody for “healing prayer.” I honestly have no idea what this phrase refers to and have never heard it in an LDS context. And the formal type of shunning portrayed happening to the Pyres is not something we do. Though obviously, wards vary in their culture, there is no formal instruction not to talk to those who have questions. Rather, we are encouraged to keep being friends with those who are struggling with faith and support them however we can. Changing History — It is interesting to note that in the actual chain of events, it was Sister Low, not Bishop Low, who was on the Lafferty hit list. Sister Low was a Relief Society President who supported Dan’s wife as she sought a divorce. Why does the show change this? Perhaps the idea that the Church has female leaders doesn’t fit well with the show’s depiction of the oppression of women in the LDS church. Brenda Lafferty’s sister has also expressed her disappointment with the way the show is misconstruing her sister’s murder in pursuit of an

Abortion, the Courts, and Compromise

When we stop depending on legislatures as the place Americans can hash out their disagreements, it should perhaps not surprise us when court mandates don’t effectively fill the gap.