clay-banks-Pq6_1gNwjjY-unsplash (1)

It’s Time for a Holiday Realignment

Our holidays are a reflection of who we are as a society. What do ours say about us?

Everyone looks forward to a good holiday. There is something special about a day with “no real expectations”—a day off from work and responsibility. A day to celebrate the good that has happened in the past. In light of recent events in the United States, we might be due for a couple of new holidays. And while these new holidays should definitely come with a heap of celebration, hear me out when I suggest that they should also come with a good dose of responsibility. 

According to congressional research published in 2014, the United States currently celebrates eleven federal holidays: “New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday, Inauguration Day (every four years following a presidential election), George Washington’s Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.” 

In the United States, we use most of these days to honor and celebrate great leaders in our nation’s history, as well as those who have fought on behalf of our freedoms. We’ve also enshrined Christmas, a literal holy day from the Christian and Pagan traditions. (Columbus Day and Thanksgiving have some additional complications, but that may be a conversation for another time). All of our federal holidays have been in practice for generations, with the exception of the newly added Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in 1983. 

During the American Civil War, on September 22, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued an executive order. This order, popularly known as the Emancipation Proclamation, freed all Black Americans enslaved within the rebelling Confederate States. The proclamation paved the way for the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which formally abolished slavery throughout the U.S.

But slave owners dragged their feet and were slow to comply, especially if there were no Union soldiers nearby to enforce the new mandate. Texas was the slave state furthest from Washington, D.C.; as a result, slavery did not immediately end there. Some slave owners ended up moving to Texas as the war raged, bringing enslaved people with them. 

In 1865, almost three years after Lincoln made his proclamation, federal troops were deployed to Texas to emancipate its enslaved people. The Union army arrived in Galveston on June 19 and declared: “The people of Texas are informed that, in accordance with a proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free.”

Juneteenth—a very American combination of the words “June” and “nineteenth”—is a holiday that celebrates the end of chattel slavery in the U.S. and has been in practice in various parts of the country since 1866. Cookouts, historical re-enactments, beauty pageants, stirring patriotism—this holiday has it all. And yet, until recently, many Americans had never heard of it.

As a nation, we rightfully pride ourselves in the ability of our citizens to have a voice in our government and exercise it by voting for our representatives.

By many measures, white supremacy and chattel slavery are two of this country’s greatest sins—sins that the United States cannot and should not escape. We cannot undo the horrors of slavery, but we can remember them and vow to not repeat them. 

One small step in that long journey would be to declare Juneteenth a national holiday —a day when all Americans can celebrate the sweet blessing of freedom while acknowledging that not everyone has enjoyed it throughout our history.

Another potential holiday worth considering is Election Day—honoring the fact that the United States is a republic that practices representative democracy. As a nation, we rightfully pride ourselves in the ability of our citizens to have a voice in our government and exercise it by voting for our representatives. Of course, elections happen numerous times and it’s not practical to have a national holiday for every election. But every four years, on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, the American people assemble for an especially significant vote—one that puts a single person in the highest office in the land. It’s a day when we are as citizens all at our “most American,” and hey, that’s something worth celebrating too! 

A huge part of voting is showing up. I have always loved going to my local polling place and waiting my turn to have my voice be heard. I love wearing my “I Voted” sticker and usually keep wearing it until fuzzies from my hoodie render it unsticky. I have never felt unsafe going out to vote, and I know that is a huge privilege. 

There are growing concerns in this country about voter suppression—reflected in concerning laws that have ultimately had the practical effect of preventing marginalized people from participating rightfully in democracy. Gerrymandering voting districts also keep a party’s control in those areas. And throughout our history, we’ve also experienced generations of violence and voter intimidation. We should all be embarrassed by this, and we should strive to repair it. 

Some have argued that the fact that Election Day is not a holiday is yet another subtle way of eliminating marginalized voices from our national conversation. Many polling places are only open during regular business hours, making it difficult or even impossible for a shocking number of working Americans to vote. One never knows how long the wait will be, and no one should have to give up their wages in order to embrace their right to vote. Election Day should be a national holiday as a way to make it easier for  everyone to vote. One day, every four years, to celebrate the beauty of democracy in action. That sounds like a pretty holy day to me! 

About the author

Melissa Leilani Larson

Melissa Leilani Larson is a Filipino American writer based in Salt Lake City. Her award-winning work has been seen on four continents. Her produced plays include "Pride and Prejudice," "Mountain Law," "Pilot Program" and many others. She has written the screenplay for "Jane and Emma" and "Freetown." She has an MFA from the Iowa Playwrights Workshop. melissaleilanilarson.com
On Key

You Might Also Like

Mourning Together as Morning Dawns

Much sorrow is being felt in the wake of this pandemic, by so many. How can we better “mourn with those that mourn,” while also working through our own grief in healing ways?

Mapping Public Disagreements about Election Challenges

Disagreements over the integrity of our recent presidential election don’t appear to be going away anytime soon. In such a heated atmosphere, there is remarkably little comprehension (on either side) as to the nuances of their opponents’ actual beliefs. That’s where a map like this might just come in handy.

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 5, “The One Mighty and Strong”

Summary – Pyre is interrogating Sam, who shouts scripture at him about the “one mighty and strong.” Pyre uses false details about the murder to trick Sam into revealing that he isn’t the murderer. The police chief is getting ready to release the brothers, so Taba stalls him while Pyre talks to Robin about his brothers’ involvement in the “School of the Prophets” and gets him to reveal two names: Bernard Brady, a Provo businessman, and Prophet Onias. The detectives follow up with Bishop Low and his wife, located at the end of the last episode, asking them about the excommunication of Dan and Ron. The bishop is reluctant to reveal details because of clergy confidentiality but eventually reveals that Dan was excommunicated based on the testimony of his daughters that he attempted to forcibly take them as polygamous wives. We get a flashback to a heartbreaking scene where Matilda has sex with Dan to distract him as her daughters escape out a window in the middle of the night. Dan was excommunicated, and the girls were placed with a family in the ward (as the bishop refused to call CPS) but later ran away, and now they and their brother are missing. At his daughter’s baby blessing, Ron confronts the bishop about his brother’s excommunication, not knowing about Dan’s attempted polygamy and thinking that it’s about his political beliefs. Brenda has a conversation with Sister Low and Diana, indicating that both know that Ron is abusing her but only Brenda is willing to do anything about it. In fact, Sister Low feeds Diana a line about how her only duty is “creating a home and environment to sustain and support our Priesthood holder.” To Detective Pyre, the bishop claims to have followed church procedure but eventually encouraged Diana to leave and gave her money to do so. The detectives follow up on Robin’s lead about Bernard Brady by arriving at his house in the foothills of Provo with a warrant. We find out that the Bradys sheltered Ron when he was having a hard time. In a flashback, Ron receives a summons to a church disciplinary court and blames Diana for it. He punches her in the face and begins throwing the food she’s preparing on the floor, saying he’ll starve her into obedience. Diana grabs a kitchen knife and drives Ron from the house, telling him not to come back. Back in the present, Bernard admits to being in the School of the Prophets study group and driving miles to pick up Prophet Onias and the Laffertys but denies being further into the group than that. But when he sends his wife out of the room to make lemonade, he produces a notarized letter he sent to himself with details of the Laffertys’ hit list, including that Diana is on the list because she wrote a letter that got Ron excommunicated. The detectives rightly chastise him for not taking this information to the police earlier. Brady reveals that he knows the location of “the farm,” a Lafferty compound. With Allen’s help in drawing a map, the detectives plan to stake out the property in the morning. Detective Pyre returns home for FHE and finds that his wife and kids have been invited to the bishop’s house for the evening and are spending the night there. Pyre believes this is an attempt to keep an eye on his family and control the narrative about the case. The next morning on the way to the raid of the farm, Pyre questions Brady about the details of Ron’s excommunication, which we see in flashback. He is indeed excommunicated after lashing out at the church leaders about them not following the “correct” doctrines of the church. When Ron returns home, he finds that his teenage daughter has cut the markings out of his garments, which he puts on anyway with only a sports coat and jeans over the top. He says goodbye to his kids and leaves the home. When the farm is raided, the only people inside are three teenage girls, who we learn are from a polygamous compound in British Columbia and were brought down by Prophet Onias to be Ron’s wives. The girls show the detectives a cupboard they had been forbidden to touch, which the detectives open to reveal a single shirt belonging to Ron with some papers in the pocket, a hit list, and a revelation directed at Diana commanding her to repent and return to him. Allen is in disbelief that Ron could have written these things, but Brady confirms that Ron is a violent man. He explains that Ron fled to his parents’ home after his excommunication, where his mother confirms his calling as “the one mighty and strong” and says he’s only a heartbeat away from his rightful place. His father is lying sick in bed and asks Ron to call a doctor, but Ron recalls his cruelty to them as children and refuses. It’s implied that he indirectly caused his father’s death in order to take over the leadership of the family. Church History—This episode contains the most fabricated piece of church history in the show. When Bernard Brady reveals that Diana’s information led to Ron’s excommunication, he makes an analogy to Joseph Smith’s martyrdom. He claims that while Joseph was in hiding after destroying the press of the Nauvoo Expositor, Emma wrote a letter to Joseph encouraging him. John Taylor intercepts this letter and adds a line meant to make Joseph turn himself in, thus indirectly causing the prophet’s death. Taylor’s motive is to put Brigham Young at the head of the church, instead of Emma’s young son, in order to continue the doctrine of polygamy, which he and Brigham are already heavily involved in. Reputable historians both in and out of the church say there is no evidence to support this interpretation of events, though the succession crisis between Brigham Young and the ten-year-old Joseph Smith III is real and