Man in Sweater Holding a Menorah | Joseph Smith, Harold Bloom, & Jewish Gnosticism | Public Square Magazine | Harold Bloom Gnosticism | Harold Bloom Religion & Mormon Gnosticism

Joseph Smith, Harold Bloom, and Jewish Gnosticism

In light of Harold Bloom's passing, take a look back at his thoughts about Joseph Smith's restoration of Jewish Gnosticism.

This month America lost one of its greatest literary critics, along with one of its greatest admirers of the prophet Joseph Smith. 

Harold Bloom was known for saying that if he were born in 19th Century America, and if he were not a Jew, he’d be a Latter-day Saint. 

Why?

Bloom’s admiration, even affection, for Joseph grew from his appreciation of prophecy and poetry. 

Yes, he would write, Joseph was a religious genius. But, for Bloom he was even more. “Joseph Smith hovers in me,” he once divulged. “There cannot be too many Mormons who are as imbued with him as I am in my own odd way.”

You see, more than most, Bloom was steeped in the great literary revelators—Shakespeare and Dante; Homer and Virgil; Whitman and Blake. 

Bloom saw Joseph through this lens, and, well, he wasn’t alone. Brigham Young called Joseph  a poet, “and poets are not like other men,” he remarked, “their gaze is deeper, and reaches the roots of the soul; it is like that of the searching eyes of angels, they catch the swift thought of God and reveal it to us.” 

Bloom understood poets and a whole lot more. In one of the many recent tributes in the wake of his passing,  David Yaffe observed that he, “wrote books at the pace at which most people read them, and he read them at the pace at which most people watched TV.”

Although he was raised in an orthodox Jewish home where only Yiddish was spoken, Bloom came to a kind of Jewish Gnosticism (spiritual knowledge acquired through direct experience). The powerful and passionate God of Moses in the Torah was more appealing to him than the indulgent God of modern religion. There was a time in the late 1960s—a time of personal crisis— where he launched into a study of Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah).

  Joseph Smith hovers in me. There cannot be too many Mormons who are as imbued with him as I am in my own odd way. 


He preferred being called a Jewish Gnostic than an atheist. When asked about God, he would lament that he couldn’t avoid Him. In his books, Bloom discussed “the path of poetic influence.” He studied the work of Gershom Scholem and attempted to use the structure of Kabbalah to map the path that poets took, building upon or reacting to the work of past writers. His masterwork was The Anxiety of Influence

Kabbalah is meant to lead the mystic through a journey of knowledge to the divine. This knowledge is gained individually and is not to be trusted to the world at large but only to those who qualify as both dedicated and righteous. In descent from the divine, there are 10 “sefirot” which could be considered as channels of divine creative life force or consciousness from God to man. They are Divine Will (Crown); Conscious Intellect (Wisdom, Understanding); and Conscious Emotions (Kindness, Discipline, Beauty, Eternity, Splendor, Foundation, and Kingship). These extend downward from the Infinite God to the material world and the initiate masters these channels upward until he understands what God knows.  

In 1992, Bloom published The American Religion. The book is “religious criticism” that focuses partly on the history of various American religions, but mostly on their spiritual values. He centers on the use of religion for Americans who have grown a culture that focuses on the individual. Thus, he looked not for communal paths to salvation but for the enabling of a one-to-one confrontation with the divine. He believed Joseph prevailed in his wrestle with the angel: “Smith’s insight could have come only from a remarkably apt reading of the Bible, and there I would locate the secret of his religious genius. …So strong was this act of reading that it broke through all the orthodoxies—Protestant, Catholic, Judaic—and found its way back to elements that Smith rightly intuited had been censored out of the stories of the archaic Jewish religion. Smith’s radical sense of the theomorphic patriarchs and anthropomorphic gods is an authentic return to J, or the Yahwist, the Bible’s first author.”

Bloom had no access to the rituals of Latter-day Saint temples. If he had, he would have perhaps understood with even greater depth his own observation that “the great affinity between Judaism and 19th-century Mormonism is that each is the phenomenon not of a people becoming a religion but of a religion becoming a people.” 

Even so, he seemed to sense how Latter-day Saint temple rituals fastened themselves on ancient Merkavah (Chariot) Jewish mysticism. “I do not find it possible to doubt that Joseph Smith was an authentic prophet,” he would write, “Where in all of American history can we find this match? …I observe that his achievement as national prophet and seer is clearly unique in our history.”

The one [religion] that most vehemently and persuasively defies and denies the reality of death is the original Mormonism of the prophet, seer and revelator Joseph Smith.

Significantly, it was Joseph Smith’s rejection of death in which Bloom located Joseph’s full prophetic prowess. 

“What is the essence of religion?” Bloom asks. 

“Sigmund Freud said it was the longing for the father. Others have called it the desire for the mother or for transcendence. I fear deeply that all these are idealizations, and I offer the rather melancholy suggestion that they would all vanish from us if we did not know that we must die.”

“Religion,” he said, “rises inevitably from our apprehension of our own death. To give meaning to meaninglessness is the endless quest of all religion. When death becomes the center of our consciousness, then religion authentically begins.”

Of all religions, however, “the one that most vehemently and persuasively defies and denies the reality of death is the original Mormonism of the prophet, seer and revelator Joseph Smith.”

With his recent passing, I can only imagine that Bloom now sees Joseph’s prophetic defiance of death in a new light.

About the author

Gale Boyd

Gale Boyd has been a teacher, poet, author, and editor and is currently the copy editor for Public Square Magazine. Born in D.C. and raised in L.A., she joined the Church at age 16, converting from Science, which was the religion in her home. She discovered her true heritage a few years later and began her deep dive into Judaism at that point. Fifteen years into her temple marriage, her then family of seven began their 14-year adventure in international living by moving to Israel, where they lived for 8 years, adding one more child and changing the trajectory of eight lives.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Honoring The Courage of Veterans

On this Veteran’s day, we take the opportunity to not merely honor indiscriminately, but specifically on those who have made the deliberate choice to sacrifice for liberty under law in our nation.

How We Heal

The division is growing. And the American people are weary. But the truth of forgiveness and reconciliation is no less available and promising. One mediator’s perspective.

Oxidized Bronze Swords to Ploughshares Sculpture | Beating Ploughshares Into Swords | Public Square Magazine | Beat Plowshares into Swords | Ploughshares into Swords

Beating Ploughshares Into Swords

Recent criticism of Elder Holland’s remarks show us that anyone can be made an enemy, but the tradeoff is a world where the most vulnerable are taught they have very few friends.

“You’re Cordially Invited” Movie Review 2025

“You’re Cordially Invited” is a movie about terrible behavior before a wedding. In an intriguing riff on the premise, the brides are the ones on their best behavior. When Jim (Will Ferrell) calls the venue where he and his late wife were married to schedule the wedding of his daughter, the desk agent confirms,. However, her pen runs out of ink, and she falls over dead before she can replace it. So when Margot (Reese Witherspoon) calls to book the venue located on the property her grandmother used to live on for her sister’s wedding, the event is double booked. A year later, when both wedding parties arrive on the same day, explosions ensue. The screenplay tracks the goodwill between the parties cratering until it hits its nadir with Will Ferrell capturing an alligator, taking it back to the inn, and now that he’s hit rock bottom, deciding he shouldn’t actually release the gator into the other wedding reception. Phew! Character growth achieved, and crisis averted. Performances and Direction In terms of feel, quality, and laughs, I’d put this somewhere between “Bride Wars,” the clunker with Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway also fighting over a wedding venue, and “The Proposal” the serviceable feel-good that places the relationship in a broader family dynamic. The players here are all high quality. Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon are professionals putting on a good show, and they have more chemistry then I would have guessed. Jimmy Tatro who plays one of the grooms, Keyla Monterroso Mejia who plays one of the bridesmaids/wedding planners, and Vinny Thomas, who plays Margot’s assistant, all bring energy and life to the script. And it’s clear that it’s being helmed by a steady hand, Nicholas Stoller, who has built a career on raunchy middle-of-the-road comedies of decreasing quality. And I’d say, of his films, this one is really only better than “Storks” or maybe “Neighbors 2.”  Weak Writing and Cultural Commentary The movie lacks any real zest or inspiration. It’s not unfunny, I just can’t imagine remembering any of the jokes in a few days. And while the film spends a lot of time trying to make fun of woke-scolds, the film also seems too scared of them for these jokes to ever really work.   The bigger problem is that the entire film is drenched in profanity. It’s as though someone wrote a perfectly fine middle-of-the-road rom-com. The studio said it needed to be ten minutes longer, so they decided to add ten minutes of F words.  They are pointless and degrading, and makes what is otherwise a fine if uninspiring film one that is decidedly worth avoiding.  The film is also a bit of a window into how culture views marriage, and it’s not all inspiring. The film concludes that a couple who dated for several years through college, and is happy moving in together across the country, with stable jobs, are better off getting their marriage annulled because marriage is just such a big step.  This film also continues the trend of promoting family reconciliation by processing psychological trauma, by blaming whatever generation is older than whoever wrote the movie. It’s long been a trope to blame the parents, but now we’re reconciling with the parents by blaming the grandparents. “Encanto” did it well, but the new variation of the trope is already starting to wear thin. I think the only people who will truly love this film are those who buy in to the Witherspoon-Ferrell chemistry so much they are willing to watch it go anywhere. I wouldn’t watch this movie with children.  One and a half out of five stars. “You’re Cordially Invited” releases on Amazon Prime on January 30, 2025. Related Articles  In Pursuit of the Perfect Family Movie Heretic in Real Life: A Missionary’s True Story of Survival and Faith Is There Anyone Who Shouldn’t Watch “Rule Breakers”? Public Square Magazine Film of the Year: Corpus Christi 

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This