Man w/ Flowers, Looking at Tombstone in Cemetery | Make The Good Times Stop: Pop Culture’s Fixation on Eternal Oblivion | Public Square Magazine | Eternal Oblivion

Making Meaning of COVID Loss

Job's words, "The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord," are especially meaningful post-COVID.

The Germans would have a word for it, like they do for Sehnsuchta feeling of longing for something unknown. But so far no descriptor exists for the sensation of coming across pre-planned events scribbled on a 2020 calendar that no longer exist. April’s dental and hair appointments. May’s banquet to laud the teenager’s track team season, which disappeared after the first meet. Or trips, like the June flights to celebrate a son’s commencement, canceled after six long years of PhD work. And what of July, August, September? Will anyone really go back to school, or will this ever be over? 

Our family’s COVID losses arrived, mercifully, more in volume than in magnitude: high school’s spring rituals canceled, several college internships revoked, a church mission evacuated just as language fluency emerged, and living disruptions resulting in, at one point, eleven of us quarantined togetherreplete with in-laws, a granddaughter, all our idiosyncrasies, and grocery shortages. But we’ve hung on to our health, so far, and, also so far, our jobs, unlike many whose losses cut painfully deeper.

But we also experienced, along with the discomfiting sensation of a life unmoored and upended, some unexpected grace. During the quarantine phase, we played games, took walks, painted a weathered fence, and got out the sewing machine initially to make face masks, but also ended up sewing pajamas and a pink toddler dress. After the birth of a new grandson, we took our first family photo in five years with everyone present. And then, as restrictions lifted and everyone dispersed, the nomenclature came up short again. How to describe the phenomenon of missing the compensation that loss bestowed as the shared cooking, cleaning, and bonding came to an end and, of those still left, no one wants to go on a walk anymore?

What about the art of accepting what’s beyond our control and of harboring hope for better things to come? Can our losses at least give us that?

As if to compensate for a dearth of idioms with which to make sense of loss and its paradoxes, an abundance of literature expounds on the subject. As spring 2020’s global and personal losses persisted into summer, I revisited Rabbi David Wolpe’s contribution, Making Loss Matter: Creating Meaning in Difficult Times. Wolpe’s vision takes up Job’s refrain that Novel Coronavirus continues reiterating around the world: “The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.” There is taking, but also giving, and even in loss, nature abhors a vacuum. Our deprivations, both minor and disastrous, make room for new matternot just silver linings and opened windows to accompany closed doors, but alternate paths that replace shredded multi-colored coats with meaningful missions. If nothing else, when all is said and done, loss at least bestows wisdom if our hearts are open to it. 

After all, according to Wolpe and the biblical and personal journeys he wends through, life consists of a continual series of losses to grow from. We lose our old selvesselves which can embarrass us in retrospect even while retaining “an unrecoverable magic”yet we evolve into more mature selves and identities. We lose our childhood homes, repeating the story of leaving Eden for the threatening world at large, but find new ones, sometimes even inside ourselves. We lose in love, for as Wolpe points out, “there is no deep love without loss.” Yet we learn to love again, finding that “out of pain comes the steepest growth because the resources of the soul are most severely taxed.” And we also lose faith, both atheistic and religious, as we replace simplistic notions that the world must be just or fair, or that we will be spared suffering if we are good enough, with a deeper faith “tough and lasting…durable enough to outlast even its own periodic absence.” 

For fastidious planners like me who calendar out months, even years at a time under the illusion that goal setting will somehow hold future demons at bay, a much-needed takeaway is Wolpe’s assertion that “acceptance of the unpredictability of life, the loss of the illusion of control, is a crucial mark of maturity… [for] life refuses to be broken and tamed.” The calendar items, jobs, and health that Covid-19 keeps erasing contribute not only to our sense of loss but compound our sense of powerlessness. Here, Wolpe’s chapter on lost dreams is particularly helpful, for dreams, indeed, get deferred, careers halted, businesses downturned, and good health ravaged. But losing our dreams “of what should have been,” writes Wolpe, gives us “the gift of what might be.” Just as juvenile delusions of grandeur give way to more realistic possibilities, a dream can be transformed, at least leaving “wisdom in its wake.”

Admittedly, I’m often tempted into poet Elizabeth Bishop’s more pessimistic vision. In her famous poem “One Art,” she posits that “the art of losing’s not too hard to master,” then ironically belies that premise by poignantly listing the things that “seem filled with the intent to be lost that their loss is no disaster”: “lost door keys, the hour badly spent,” “my mother’s watch,” “my last, or next-to-last, of three loved houses,” and finally, “losing you (the joking voice, a gesture I love) I shan’t have lied…though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.”

Grace persists, too, even for us twenty-first-century wimps.

The art of losing is indeed hard to master and often feels like disaster even with all the practice life bestows. But what about the art of accepting what’s beyond our control and of harboring hope for better things to come? Can our losses at least give us that?  Victor Frankl surrendered the manuscript of his life’s work when he entered a concentration camp but replaced it with the conviction that instead of writing about his ideas, he would have to live them out. He, of anyone, proved that, however powerless we find ourselves in certain conditions, we haven’t lost our ability to find meaning in them.

I should have re-visited Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl’s lived testament, as news of the pandemic escalated and I panicked over potential sickness, lost opportunities, and retirement funds, and the demise of the easily traveled pre-pandemic world we’d known. Instead, I found a strange solace in reading Caroline Moorehead’s biography of Lucie de la Tour du Pin, Dancing to the Precipice. It doesn’t get much more out-of-control and loss-filled than going from being a French noble of the ancien regime (with your mother a lady-in-waiting to Marie Antoinette) to escaping the guillotine, losing several fortunes and homes, traipsing from country to country, and, in the cruelest twist of all, burying all but one of your beloved children. 

Two centuries before Martin Seligman’s academically compelling observations on the power of positive psychology—that even after controlling for socio-economic and differing circumstances, those who rewire their thought processes toward hope over despair do better in careers, relationships, and health—Lucie seems the historical poster child for Seligman’s “learned optimism.” I particularly appreciated the biographer’s pauses after each blow to note the silence in Lucie’s correspondence or memoirs as she took time to grieve, recuperate, and reemerge with gratitude for what was left: a good marriage, a loyal friend, a new home, however small or shared, and life itself. 

My ancestors’ personal histories offer similar perspectives. They make me feel wimpy with sagas of crossing oceans and western plains alongside parents and siblings dying. My parents’ journeys, too, entail childhoods in Great Depression small towns, young adult years during life upended by World War II, and child-rearing years that included receiving Vietnam War draft lottery numbers for my older brothers. But continually interspersing their losses is grace: the security of childhood homes, falling in love, getting a job, recovering from serious illness, and finding solace in religious observance and meaning in family obligations. 

Grace persists, too, even for us twenty-first-century wimps. An online semester, a campus job, and a gig at a grocery store replaced my son-in-law’s and two college kids’ lost internships. The teenager with the forfeited track season searched in vain for a summer job until his older siblings’ former employer texted that, with business picking up in June, he could use a part-time fry cook. Nothing glamorous, but they are grateful for the work. The re-routed missionary from Asia has been temporarily reassigned, along with a small horde of other uprooted missionaries, to Bakersfield, California. His new mission president has already reached out on Zoom to welcome his displaced flock. And I’ve added a new item on the family calendar that doesn’t look like it will get erased: return to church on June 28, 2020. 

The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.

 

About the author

Betsy VanDenBerghe

Betsy VanDenBerghe is a former editor for the Ensign. She has written for First Things, National Review, Washington Post, and Real Clear Politics. She is a graduate of Harvard's Radcliffe Publishing Course.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Starting Fresh

It’s normal for any of us to get overwhelmed by the difficulties in the momentum of our lives. Let’s take hope and heart right now from God and the creative divinity He has placed right inside us.

Is it Time for Latter-day Saints to Support Same-Sex Marriage?

I wanted to thank Blair Hodges for calling attention to an article we ran earlier this year by Professor Robert P. George.  Blair has been a frequent critic of the magazine, and we appreciate his engagement and efforts in drawing attention to the work we’re doing. As one of the pre-eminent political philosophers working today, Professor George’s decision to publish with us was a major sign of legitimacy.  Hodge’s article was, in many ways, perceptive. He noticed that Professor George, and by extension, many of our editors here, is concerned that many people, especially religious people, struggle to justify their beliefs about family, marriage, and sexuality through anything other than appeals to religious authority. (We kindly disagree that these positions are anti-LGBT+ as Blair describes them.) And he’s right about that motivation. Church leaders have been very clear about the doctrine of the family for more than a generation, as we highlighted earlier this year. But where the cultural messaging on sexuality is so dominant, it’s easy for Latter-day Saints to feel overwhelmed and struggle to explain to others why they accept what prophet leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ teach what they do.   And Hodges is right that we hope to make a difference in this regard with our work. But otherwise, his article falls into the same traps of many before him that George and others have largely dealt with. Conflating “Hyper-Individualism” with “Expressive-Individualism” Hodges attempts to address George’s concern with individualism. But he makes a category error. Individualism, as Hodges uses it, seems to be a synonym for selfish. Individualism, as George uses it, means how we define the individual. These are two substantially different concepts. On this basis, Hodges raises concerns about hyper-individualism (hyper-selfish)—pointing out this issue is no more relevant to LGBT+ issues than to anyone else. That’s a fine argument to make, but it really has nothing to do with the point George makes. His point being, how we define the individual is of crucial importance to issues of sexuality. Because today the predominant cultural approach to defining the self is expressive individualism. Expressive individualism is a philosophy that holds that who we are is defined by what we feel we are at our psychological core. And that the greatest good is expressing that psychological core to the world, including through our behavior.  As described by Carl Trueman in his recent book The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self, this idea has its roots in the work of Romantic philosophers like Jean-Jaques Rousseau and like-minded poets, literary figures, and artists of the 18th and 19th centuries, but largely took off in the 1960s at the beginning of the sexual revolution. Expressive individualism has substantially become our culture’s default approach to defining identity. But many Christians push back on this idea as we choose to make our central identities based on a different foundation.  As articulated by President Nelson in a recent devotional for young adults, he explained that the three identities we should prioritize (and not allow to be obscured) are 1) Child of God 2) Child of the Covenant 3) Disciple of Christ As Latter-day Saints, then, we choose to make those our central identities and base our choices on that foundation.  Hodges also suspects that “queerness would be less ‘central’ to a person’s identity the less social pressure and regulation they’d face about it.”  But what does Hodges mean by less central? If identity powerfully influences the choices we make, then the less central an identity, the less influence it has over our choices. These choices include why, how, when, and with whom someone has sexual relations. Prioritizing disciple of Christ and child of the covenant as identities, as Russell M. Nelson suggests, would lead to different choices about sex than prioritizing sexuality as identity. Love and Disagreement One of Hodges’ main requests is that George “spent more time saying how a person can be loving towards someone while also condemning an important part of their identity.” In our view, this is a tired argument in an already wearisome conversation. Sexuality is not an inevitably central part of identity.  Our editorial team falls across the political spectrum. In each of our lives, we have people who love us despite having serious concerns with that political part of our identity.  Our editorial team are all Latter-day Saints. In each of our lives, we have people who love us despite harboring serious questions about the important religious part of our identity. We’ve also felt loved by people who thought it was a dangerous and outdated idea not to have sex until marriage, constituting an important part of all our sexual identities. But Hodges’ argument suggests it’s somehow impossible to love someone while having honest concerns about how they prioritize the sexual part of their identity.  But of course, it’s not. Not only is it possible, but Christian believers are under clear command to love those we disagree with.  It’s those who demand “you can’t love me unless you agree with my paradigm for identity” that are preaching an extreme and radically alternative  approach to tolerance in a pluralistic society, not those who say, “I love you, but I disagree.” That has been the durable default of pluralistic tolerance that has helped make our diverse nation possible. Race and Sexuality Blair also goes to the old tired well of comparing race and sexuality. This is a comparison that many civil rights activists have rejected.  Dr. Alveda King, Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece, and William Avon Keen, president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Virginia, the organization Martin Luther King Jr. started, have rejected the connection between sexuality and race in civil rights.  In fact, George takes on Blair’s point at length in his article in Harvard’s Journal of Law and Public Policy: Revisionists today miss this central question—what is marriage? when they equate traditional marriage laws with laws banning interracial marriage. … But the analogy fails: antimiscegenation was about whom to

Most Religious Groups Support Abortion

Nearly 2/3 of Americans support legal abortion,  This even includes religious Americans.  The outliers are white evangelicals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Latter-day Saints and Hispanic Protestants.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!