A resilient couple embraces amidst crashing waves, symbolizing the commitment to strengthening your marriage.

Fighting Relationship Entropy: An Expert’s Secret to Lasting Love

Marriage is a key for happiness and stability, but relationships don't occur in a vacuum. How does society affect our relationships? How can it help more?

Several years ago, when I was leading a faith-based marriage enrichment seminar, a couple shared a very personal story with the group. We were discussing the challenge of nurturing our relationships, including the sexual part. One brave couple admitted they had struggled with this. They had two small children to go along with two demanding jobs and very busy lives. Not too surprisingly, their sexual relationship had succumbed to these common stresses. They were so exhausted at the end of their hectic days and weeks that the desire part of sex was missing even though there was still real love. One night, they had the courage to express to each other their sense of loss and disappointment. 

But here’s what really touched me: rather than accept fate, they wanted to be more intentional rather than just wait for some future time for life to get easier. So, they decided that on Friday nights, they would get the kids to bed on time, and then they, too, would head directly to Slumberland. But they set their alarm clock for 2:00 am. Because they were so tired at the end of a busy work week, they planned to get some deep REM sleep first and then wake in the quiet and peaceful early morning to make sweet love to each other, then fall back asleep. With tears in her eyes but a smile on her face, this wife said this weekly ritual may have saved their marriage through a hard time.

Falling apart is the natural dis-order of things.

Now, she didn’t say how long this rather novel solution lasted. And it wouldn’t work for most. In fact, another woman in the seminar sharply elbowed her husband after the story and not so quietly whispered, “Don’t even think about it!” But as I pointed out to the group, this was a beautiful illustration of how we need to work on our relationships, not just passively flow with the current.

There is a Second Law of Marital Thermodynamics. Its counterpart in physics tells us that all physical systems in the universe are naturally falling apart—losing energy and headed towards chaos—unless there are regular inputs of anti-entropic energy into the system. The same principle applies to relational systems, as well. We talk a lot about why marriages fall apart, but no explanation is really needed. Falling apart is the natural dis-order of things; coasting takes you in only one direction—downhill. (Anyone with kitchen- or bathroom-cleaning duties intuitively understands this.) What requires explanation is how marriages and families stay strong and ordered. No matter how powerful the love that originally pulled two people together into one orbit, the attractive force eventually weakens unless the couple regularly reenergizes their relationship. (Think: date nights, meals together, talking, bathing brains in oxytocin—the bonding hormone—via touch and sex, forgiving, couple prayer.)  

Modern marriages need energy, especially given the high expectations we have for them. Eli Finkel at Northwestern University makes this case in his book, The All-or-Nothing Marriage. He argues that marriage has undergone dramatic shifts, changing from an institution historically tasked with helping people meet basic human needs and rearing children to one that nurtures companionship (albeit within pretty traditional gender roles), to one now that is oriented toward empowering individuals to find greater self-fulfillment and personal growth. But contemporary high-altitude marriages with summit-level expectations need a lot of oxygen, Finkel argues. They need a lot of time and effort and communication and interpersonal aptitude to ascend to the soul-level connection we seek. Without smart relationship skills, our marriages gasp for oxygen; they become stale, unsatisfying, and ultimately disappointing. Madison Avenue’s pop psychology voice echoes in our heads: “Why settle for less than you deserve?”

The need to work on our relationships and not just coast is not a new concept to the 21st century. The historian, Kristin Celello, at Queens College, in her book, Making Marriage Work, traces and critiques the history of marriage “experts” across the 20th century writing advice columns for the masses, offering marriage enrichment classes, and providing marriage counseling to help couples work on their relationships. But given the inevitable force of relational entropy and our current high expectations for marriage in the 21st century—not to mention the ever-present digital platter of alternative relationship possibilities—the need to nurture our relationships has never been greater than it is now.

Some people have never seen a healthy marriage.

And pages could be written about how so many people these days struggle to even understand what a healthy romantic relationship is and lose hope that they could ever have one. A recent report estimates that by 2050—one generation from now—one-third of American adults at age 45 will have never married (and will be unlikely to ever marry). Some people have never seen a healthy marriage growing up; it’s more of a Disney fantasy than an anticipated life marker. Nearly a quarter of high school seniors now say they “have no idea” if marriage is even in their future. The relationship work these young people need to do starts with the most elemental step of understanding what a healthy relationship and good marriage look like, why it is good for them, and building hope that they can attain it. Far too many young women (and men) experience sexual trauma and intimate partner violence that can distort even the idea of healthy romance, a distortion that bleeds over into committed relationships and undermines the capacities to form and sustain them.

But this helplessness need not be determinative. There are specific steps that both individuals and communities can take to learn how to build meaningful, healthy relationships. In this series of articles, I intend to discuss some of the public policy approaches that have been tested to help couples form and sustain healthy relationships and stronger marriages, primarily here in Utah, where I serve as the manager of the Utah Marriage Commission, but also across the country, wherever they are found.

About the author

Alan J. Hawkins

Alan J. Hawkins is manager of the Utah Marriage Commission and an emeritus professor in the Brigham Young University School of Family Life. His work focuses on educational interventions and public policies to help couples form and sustain healthy relationships and stronger relationships, and prevent unnecessary divorce.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Unique Mission of BYU

Ben Paccini speaks about Elder Holland’s address to BYU faculty and staff and the various responses to it. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Baseball Does Religious Freedom

Two stories out over the past several days seem deserving of attention. In one, Walmart settled a religious freedom complaint that seemed likely to end up before the Supreme Court. While in the other, the Major League Baseball team, the Tampa Bay Rays, had a temporary team uniform celebrating sexuality as an identity that several players had religious objections to wearing. The similarities between the two cases are clear. In both, employees sought religious accommodations at work. And in our opinion, these represent a positive step forward for religious freedom. The Walmart case is more complicated. One employee was offered an assistant manager position, but because he was a Seventh-day Adventist, he chose not to work from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. This meant that Walmart would need to rearrange schedules by asking other managers to cover unpopular shifts, leave the store understaffed, or hire an additional manager. All of these potential accommodations would impose some cost on Walmart. The current law on this issue is that employers do not need to accommodate religious employees if there is more than a trivial cost attached. This is a much lower standard of accommodation than is required in other cases, and so some have suggested that the Supreme Court might intervene to make the standard for religious accommodations the same as other kinds of accommodations. While Walmart’s settling prevents that Supreme Court case, for now, it does suggest perhaps a changing tide that employers may be recognizing the prudence of a fairness for all approach. The Tampa Bay Rays situation is in much murkier legal waters. Private employers can compel speech in most cases, even if it’s not directly related to the job, but does asking for a specific religious exemption constitute more than a trivial cost? The Rays sidestepped this question entirely by putting their diversity policies where their mouth is. While some fans opposed anything other than total conformity from the players, the coach said that conversations in the clubhouse were what the Associated Press described as “constructive and emphasized the value of differing perspectives.” It is certainly always difficult to be part of the small group that opts out of the popular statement, but I think it is a sign of progress that in both the cases of Walmart (eventually through litigation) and the Rays, employers recognized the need to appreciate the religious diversity in their workplace.