A resilient couple embraces amidst crashing waves, symbolizing the commitment to strengthening your marriage.

Fighting Relationship Entropy: An Expert’s Secret to Lasting Love

Marriage is a key for happiness and stability, but relationships don't occur in a vacuum. How does society affect our relationships? How can it help more?

Several years ago, when I was leading a faith-based marriage enrichment seminar, a couple shared a very personal story with the group. We were discussing the challenge of nurturing our relationships, including the sexual part. One brave couple admitted they had struggled with this. They had two small children to go along with two demanding jobs and very busy lives. Not too surprisingly, their sexual relationship had succumbed to these common stresses. They were so exhausted at the end of their hectic days and weeks that the desire part of sex was missing even though there was still real love. One night, they had the courage to express to each other their sense of loss and disappointment. 

But here’s what really touched me: rather than accept fate, they wanted to be more intentional rather than just wait for some future time for life to get easier. So, they decided that on Friday nights, they would get the kids to bed on time, and then they, too, would head directly to Slumberland. But they set their alarm clock for 2:00 am. Because they were so tired at the end of a busy work week, they planned to get some deep REM sleep first and then wake in the quiet and peaceful early morning to make sweet love to each other, then fall back asleep. With tears in her eyes but a smile on her face, this wife said this weekly ritual may have saved their marriage through a hard time.

Falling apart is the natural dis-order of things.

Now, she didn’t say how long this rather novel solution lasted. And it wouldn’t work for most. In fact, another woman in the seminar sharply elbowed her husband after the story and not so quietly whispered, “Don’t even think about it!” But as I pointed out to the group, this was a beautiful illustration of how we need to work on our relationships, not just passively flow with the current.

There is a Second Law of Marital Thermodynamics. Its counterpart in physics tells us that all physical systems in the universe are naturally falling apart—losing energy and headed towards chaos—unless there are regular inputs of anti-entropic energy into the system. The same principle applies to relational systems, as well. We talk a lot about why marriages fall apart, but no explanation is really needed. Falling apart is the natural dis-order of things; coasting takes you in only one direction—downhill. (Anyone with kitchen- or bathroom-cleaning duties intuitively understands this.) What requires explanation is how marriages and families stay strong and ordered. No matter how powerful the love that originally pulled two people together into one orbit, the attractive force eventually weakens unless the couple regularly reenergizes their relationship. (Think: date nights, meals together, talking, bathing brains in oxytocin—the bonding hormone—via touch and sex, forgiving, couple prayer.)  

Modern marriages need energy, especially given the high expectations we have for them. Eli Finkel at Northwestern University makes this case in his book, The All-or-Nothing Marriage. He argues that marriage has undergone dramatic shifts, changing from an institution historically tasked with helping people meet basic human needs and rearing children to one that nurtures companionship (albeit within pretty traditional gender roles), to one now that is oriented toward empowering individuals to find greater self-fulfillment and personal growth. But contemporary high-altitude marriages with summit-level expectations need a lot of oxygen, Finkel argues. They need a lot of time and effort and communication and interpersonal aptitude to ascend to the soul-level connection we seek. Without smart relationship skills, our marriages gasp for oxygen; they become stale, unsatisfying, and ultimately disappointing. Madison Avenue’s pop psychology voice echoes in our heads: “Why settle for less than you deserve?”

The need to work on our relationships and not just coast is not a new concept to the 21st century. The historian, Kristin Celello, at Queens College, in her book, Making Marriage Work, traces and critiques the history of marriage “experts” across the 20th century writing advice columns for the masses, offering marriage enrichment classes, and providing marriage counseling to help couples work on their relationships. But given the inevitable force of relational entropy and our current high expectations for marriage in the 21st century—not to mention the ever-present digital platter of alternative relationship possibilities—the need to nurture our relationships has never been greater than it is now.

Some people have never seen a healthy marriage.

And pages could be written about how so many people these days struggle to even understand what a healthy romantic relationship is and lose hope that they could ever have one. A recent report estimates that by 2050—one generation from now—one-third of American adults at age 45 will have never married (and will be unlikely to ever marry). Some people have never seen a healthy marriage growing up; it’s more of a Disney fantasy than an anticipated life marker. Nearly a quarter of high school seniors now say they “have no idea” if marriage is even in their future. The relationship work these young people need to do starts with the most elemental step of understanding what a healthy relationship and good marriage look like, why it is good for them, and building hope that they can attain it. Far too many young women (and men) experience sexual trauma and intimate partner violence that can distort even the idea of healthy romance, a distortion that bleeds over into committed relationships and undermines the capacities to form and sustain them.

But this helplessness need not be determinative. There are specific steps that both individuals and communities can take to learn how to build meaningful, healthy relationships. In this series of articles, I intend to discuss some of the public policy approaches that have been tested to help couples form and sustain healthy relationships and stronger marriages, primarily here in Utah, where I serve as the manager of the Utah Marriage Commission, but also across the country, wherever they are found.

About the author

Alan J. Hawkins

Alan J. Hawkins is manager of the Utah Marriage Commission and an emeritus professor in the Brigham Young University School of Family Life. His work focuses on educational interventions and public policies to help couples form and sustain healthy relationships and stronger relationships, and prevent unnecessary divorce.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven

In an age that claims to value “own voices” media, it is sad that Under the Banner of Heaven is probably going to be the biggest story that the public sees about members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints this year or this decade. While the tale it tells is based on an actual occurrence and about some actual problems within the broader movement of people hearkening back to Joseph Smith, one thing that can’t be said for either the book or the show was that they were written by a member of our community. The producer may have “grown up” as a Latter-day Saint, but he left the faith before he was an adult. If you’ve never had the experience of holding a calling, making temple covenants, or negotiating the relationships that make up a ward (Latter-day Saint congregation), are you really the best person to interpret our community? So I’m stepping in to offer my perspective. I am not a historian or theologian. So, though I try to be informed about the difficult parts of our religion’s past, I can only give you the perspective of what an average member would know or believe about these situations. I undoubtedly will get some of the nuances wrong. This will not be the best place if you’re looking for information about the historical accuracy of the show. (Consider checking FAIR’s guide or Book of Mormon Central.) However, I am an active participant in the larger Latter-day Saint literary community. I’ve written essays about my own life as a woman in the Church and fictional stories about others. I studied Latter-day Saint literature in college and continue reading contemporary Latter-day Saint literature. I am on the board of the Association for Mormon Letters, an organization that promotes literature written by, for, or about those who tie back to the prophet Joseph (including members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but not exclusive to our denomination). So you might say I have some experience with portrayals of the Latter-day Saints and separate fundamentalist communities. The purpose of this series of recaps is two-fold. First, I want to summarize the series for ordinary Latter-day Saints who don’t intend to watch it so they won’t be surprised around the metaphorical watercooler this week. Second, I will catalog the series as it compares to Latter-day Saint literature more broadly. As a writer, reader, and advocate of Latter-day Saint literature, this is my home turf. I am interested to see where the show gets things right and wrong. Granted, my experience isn’t the experience of every member; like any community, Latter-day Saints are not a monolith. But I will compare the show to my personal knowledge of our community and talk about what sticks out. Without further ado, here are my impressions of the first two episodes of Under the Banner of Heaven. Episode 1, “When God Was Love”  Summary—The episode opens with Detective Pyre being called away from his family’s Pioneer Day celebrations to visit a crime scene. At an ordinary suburban house, he finds a scene of chaos with a mother (Brenda Lafferty) and her 15-month-old daughter (Erica) murdered in a gruesome way. (Luckily, we are only shown large quantities of blood on the floor and walls; the show shies away from showing the bodies, though we will get hints through dialogue about the exact method of killing.) Soon the husband (Allen Lafferty) is taken into custody, his clothes soaked in his wife’s blood. The killer claims that his wife was murdered by men with beards like “Mormon prophets” and continually ties his wife’s murder back to early church history stories, particularly Joseph and Emma marrying against her father’s will. We then get a flashback to a young Brenda. She is an energetic and ambitious young woman who transfers to BYU after being tired of “holding girl’s hair back while they puked” at her party school in Idaho. Allen introduces Brenda to his family at a large family dinner. His brothers seem both strangely attracted to her and judgmental of her for her ambition and less strict faith (caffeinated soda is mentioned). The Lafferty family band together to clear a neighbor’s land to prevent it from being seized by the federal government to build a highway. In the present, Detective Pyre’s partner Bill visits Allen’s brother Robin’s home and finds the house abandoned and papers burning. They arrest Robin after a chase through a motel. This episode depicts the First Vision. It shows Joseph going to the woods to pray and a light shining down on him. The script draws parallels between Joseph’s prayer and Robin’s prayer in the woods before he is caught by the police, which doesn’t really make much sense except that they are both kneeling in a natural setting. We also get a scene of Joseph and Emma discussing whether to marry against her father’s wishes. The show tries to make a big deal of them choosing between “God’s will” and her father’s authority, implying that the problem is that they can justify almost anything as God’s will. I found this assertion pretty strange, given that Joseph and Emma were hardly the first couple to marry against a parent’s wishes. It seems a thin justification on which to hang a condemnation of trusting God. Shibboleths—It’s apparent that the showrunners have made an effort to try to include jargon of Latter-day Saints in the dialogue. Sometimes this works: the Pyre family prayer scene feels exactly like the ones that take place in my family. Others make it apparent that the writers are not members of the community. While we do refer to God as Heavenly Father, particularly in prayer, we don’t use this term exclusively like the characters in the show. I regularly hear members refer to him as “God” or “the Lord,” and a brief search of the church’s 1980’s general conference talks shows that this isn’t a new innovation. While there is

Struggle Doesn’t Make You Special

Those who wrestle are not a separate category of humans. That describes all of us. If so, the key question is not whether we are “willing to wrestle,” but rather, where that wrestle ultimately takes each of us.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This