A couple walking hand in hand toward a mountain, embodying the journey of strengthening relationships and overcoming challenges together.

Policy in Partnership: Inside Utah’s Marriage Commission

How does Utah support strong marriages? Utah Marriage Commission provides innovative, accessible marriage education.

The Utah Marriage Commission is housed under the same roof as Healthy Relationships Utah in an old cottage just off the Utah State University campus. Their co-residence in the modest home office intentionally reflects the close partnership between HRU and UMC, although they are distinct organizational entities. I retired last summer after 33 years at BYU to take on the role of the day-to-day manager of UMC. I work closely with Dr. David Schramm, USU associate professor and family life extension specialist, who is the faculty director of the UMC and the primary liaison between USU and UMC. He came to USU from the University of Missouri where he directed the ShowMe Healthy Relationship program funded by a multi-million-dollar federal grant. 

Online Platform for Service Delivery

UMC emphasizes easily accessible, brief educational services or what I call “micro-interventions.” Most of these services are delivered via their digital platform, StrongerMarriage.org. This includes podcasts, webinars, blogs, YouTube channel videos, online programs, and downloadable guidebooks to reach a busy contemporary audience of digital natives. The focus of these micro-interventions is more squarely on helping couples form and sustain healthy marriages and relationships.

UMC services are best thought of as preventative.

StrongerMarriage.org has an impressive list of webinars that I have enjoyed and even used in some of my classes when I was teaching at BYU. Many of these webinars feature Utah marriage counselors and generally take on more narrow but timely topics. Some of these webinars, for example, focus on coping with race-related trauma, mixed-faith marriages, sexual relationships, and understanding postpartum stresses, to name only a few. A private, on-demand webinar is an optimal way to get help on these sensitive topics.

The StrongerMarriage Connection podcasts are a new service since 2022 that provides “tips and tools, research and resources, to strengthen relationships.” Podcast #4 featured David Schramm (“Dr. Dave”) and marriage and family therapist Dr. Liz Hale (Dr. Liz) talking about four keys to a happy marriage: “search inward” (get your own heart right, work on a healthy self); “turn outward” (express gratitude, be kind, be attentive); “look up” (have a vision for the relationship, cultivate hope, seek help for the relationship when needed); and “press forward” (stay committed, be loyal, power through the inevitable rough spots). These principles come from the positive psychology movement that emphasizes character strengths rather than pathology and are backed by good research, including some work by Dr. Dave himself. The professionally produced podcast has an upbeat vibe to it that kept me listening and smiling. I also listened to podcast #2, where Dr. Dave and Dr. Liz interviewed University of Minnesota professor Dr. Bill Doherty, one of the most influential, innovative relationship practitioner-scholars in the world. In the podcast, Doherty was engaging as he talked about the mistakes that marriage counselors sometimes make which can undermine marital commitment, and by extension, how couples can avoid those counselors. But I really zoned in when he started talking about the need for couples to be more intentional about their relationship. Doherty lives near the headwaters of the Mississippi River and likes to employ this analogy: if you get in a canoe and don’t paddle, you are pulled slowly south by the current to the Gulf of Mexico. The overall point is that you have to paddle in your marriage, or you will drift south. 

UMC services are best thought of as preventative. A prime example of this is free vouchers for Utah engaged couples to take the extensively researched ePREP program for strengthening couple relationships. ePREP is a brief, online version of the most researched couple relationship education program in the world, PREP, run by scholar-practitioners out of the University of Denver’s Center for Marital and Family Studies. UMC successfully supported legislation in 2018 to provide engaged couples who invest in premarital education a discount on their marriage license. Engaged couples who take the online ePREP course (or other approved courses) can get a discount on their marriage license. It’s our way of saying “thanks” for investing upfront in the quality of your marriage. 

Additionally, Utah couples can take two of the most researched relationship inventories in the world, READY and RELATE, for free. Developed at Brigham Young University over a 30-year period, these online instruments ask partners hundreds of questions about themselves, their personal histories, and their relationship, all of which are empirically linked to successful marriages. The READY assessment guides individuals in evaluating their personal readiness for a serious relationship and the RELATE assessment assists couples to gain a better understanding of dynamics within their relationship. When both partners have answered the questions, they get a detailed report of their relationship strengths and potential problem areas that could spark meaningful conversations. Some couples use the feedback in conjunction with pre-marital or marriage counseling as a way to work on their relationship.

UMC’s services are for all income brackets and types of relationships.

UMC’s services are for all income brackets and types of relationships, including same-sex couples. HRU prioritizes more disadvantaged individuals and families. We are sensitive as well to the growing Spanish-speaking population in Utah and are working to ensure many UMC resources will be available in Spanish. Our goal is to make StrongerMarriage.org the go-to, one-stop resource center for Utah couples in all stages of relationships and in all different circumstances.

Strategic Collaborations

Given such a Himalayan (or should I say Timpanogos) vision, UMC needs to build strategic collaborations with other organizations across the state. For instance, the Commission is weaving ties with Governor Spencer Cox’s new Office of Families that “aims to support Utah families through proactive rather than reactive strategies and policies.” Governor Cox said in his 2022 state-of-the-state address that strong marriages and families is one of the secret ingredients to Utah’s success and wants a more direct coordination of all Utah policies intended to help families succeed. UMC is also nurturing a fruitful relationship with the Utah Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, a group of 500+ trained counselors that work daily with Utah couples. With four formal MFT training programs in the state, Utah may have more well-trained MFTs per capita than any other state in the union. UMC also partners with the County Clerk Offices scattered throughout Utah to provide a printed “Marriage Handbook” to couples getting their marriage license.

A family works together to build a brick wall, representing the united effort in strengthening relationships and fostering family bonds.
A family building a brick wall together in their backyard symbolizes the collective efforts in strengthening relationships and building a strong family foundation.

History of the Utah Marriage Commission

Although it has always been a governor-appointed commission, the UMC has encountered a few host transitions in its nearly quarter of a century history. Birthed and housed within the Utah Governor’s Office by then first-lady Jacalyn Leavitt with the support of her husband, former Governor Michael Leavitt, the UMC was transferred to the Department of Workforce Services (DWS) when former-Governor Jon Huntsman took office in 2004. Mrs. Leavitt, who remains an Honorary Chair of the Commission, helped facilitate the transition to DWS, where a surplus of federal TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) funds earmarked for the purpose of strengthening two-parent families provided a fruitful opportunity for the Commission to fulfill its objectives. However, after a number of years, a shift in priorities and focus within DWS created a precarious predicament for the Commission which found itself on the verge of being homeless. Fortunately, in 2013, the Utah legislature intervened, formally placed the Commission in statute, and moved host stewardship to the Department of Human Services (DHS). With its mission of providing services aimed at helping individuals and families thrive, DHS seemed a natural fit for the UMC. Despite similar goals, differences in approach (prevention vs. intervention) and focus (couples vs child/family) hindered a fully synergetic UMC-DHS relationship. So the current UMC chair, Rep. Melissa Ballard, courted Dr. Brian Higginbotham, professor and associate vice president for Extension at USU, finding an eager adoptive parent for the Commission. The mission of USU Cooperative Extension is to take the research to the people and translate it for practical application, which aligns well with UMC’s work. Higginbotham served previously on UMC and understood the mission. 

Since 1998, the Commission has operated primarily on funds from the federal TANF program that comes to the state every year from Washington, D.C., as a block grant. The formal legislative purposes of TANF emphasize employment and strengthening marriages and two-parent families. A set of marriage scholars, practitioners, and other professionals from across Utah direct the Commission’s funding. UMC currently includes five Utah legislators representing both political parties.

UMC currently includes five Utah legislators representing both political parties.

Although the UMC’s services continue to be supported with TANF funds, additional sources of funding have emerged. In 2018, the Utah legislature passed a bill that allows counties that offer online marriage license applications to charge a $20 fee to support the work of the Utah Marriage Commission. With approximately 30,000 couples marrying each year in Utah, this fee has the potential to be a significant funding stream for the UMC. In addition to TANF and marriage license fees, the Commission, under the stewardship of USU, is now positioned to fill a third fiscal pot through public-private partnerships and revenue-generating services (e.g., sponsors, donors, affiliate agreements with podcast guests, and other collaborators). Cultivating relationships with businesses and philanthropists who share the UMC’s passion for promoting strong marriages and families is an exciting new financial frontier for the Commission that might prove a great boon to its work.

Comparing Utah’s Efforts to Other State Initiatives

Over the last 25 years, several other states have tried to integrate marriage-strengthening policies into state government. But a few failed to launch, and a few others were short-lived. A new Kansas initiative was quickly attacked in the media and was quietly disbanded within a year. An initiative in Florida did not survive a political transition and the Texas initiative collapsed in the Great Recession and was never revived. In the late 1990s, then-governor of Oklahoma, Frank Keating, formed the Oklahoma Marriage Initiative and hired a public relations firm, Public Strategies, to run the initiative under the direction of the OK Department of Human Services. For more than a decade, the Oklahoma Marriage Initiative was the premier model for a state public-private partnership to provide relationship education services to the state, eventually reaching hundreds of thousands of Oklahomans. But it too collapsed when oil tax revenue tanked during the Great Recession. Public Strategies still runs impressive programs for low-income new parents and co-parents in Oklahoma City funded by federal grants, and it cooperates with state agencies to provide services. However, there is no formal state-level entity in Oklahoma that coordinates and supports relationship-strengthening education. A few states, such as Alabama and California, have federally funded initiatives that reach across the state to provide relationship education services. Healthy Relationships California has been especially effective in reaching a large number of Spanish-speaking families in the state but does not have a formal relationship with the state government. The Alabama Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education initiative, like Healthy Relationships Utah, is located within the state’s Cooperative Extension Service at Auburn University, but it is not officially in statute. 

Utah is unique among states in supporting for nearly 25 years a state-level public policy effort that provides relationship education services to its citizens. Additionally, it is an initiative that now appears to have a model for financially sustaining the operation and continues an ongoing relationship with the legislature. The UMC has been resilient, persevering through early growing pains, and is now under new management. It is also integrated with Healthy Relationships Utah with its broader mission of strengthening families, supported by state and federal grants. While time will tell how effective this new union will be, I and other observers are confident that the Commission is just now hitting its stride as it begins to celebrate its silver anniversary, anticipating its best days in the decade ahead. 

Looking Forward

The public policy path has been a winding path with a slow pace. There are still potential potholes and barricades UMC could face in looking to the future. Legislative priorities can change and not all officials support government funds being allocated for family life education services. Libertarian Republicans and Progressive Democrats often distrust these efforts, although for distinctly different reasons. I worry even more about these initiatives becoming collateral damage in never-ending, always-expanding culture wars or drowning in the unintended undertow of important diversity and inclusion policies and politics. Still, I’m optimistic, believing that UMC can give families the knowledge and skills they need to improve their relationships for decades to come. 

 

About the author

Alan J. Hawkins

Alan J. Hawkins is manager of the Utah Marriage Commission and an emeritus professor in the Brigham Young University School of Family Life. His work focuses on educational interventions and public policies to help couples form and sustain healthy relationships and stronger relationships, and prevent unnecessary divorce.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Ordinary Saint’s Guide to Under the Banner of Heaven

In an age that claims to value “own voices” media, it is sad that Under the Banner of Heaven is probably going to be the biggest story that the public sees about members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints this year or this decade. While the tale it tells is based on an actual occurrence and about some actual problems within the broader movement of people hearkening back to Joseph Smith, one thing that can’t be said for either the book or the show was that they were written by a member of our community. The producer may have “grown up” as a Latter-day Saint, but he left the faith before he was an adult. If you’ve never had the experience of holding a calling, making temple covenants, or negotiating the relationships that make up a ward (Latter-day Saint congregation), are you really the best person to interpret our community? So I’m stepping in to offer my perspective. I am not a historian or theologian. So, though I try to be informed about the difficult parts of our religion’s past, I can only give you the perspective of what an average member would know or believe about these situations. I undoubtedly will get some of the nuances wrong. This will not be the best place if you’re looking for information about the historical accuracy of the show. (Consider checking FAIR’s guide or Book of Mormon Central.) However, I am an active participant in the larger Latter-day Saint literary community. I’ve written essays about my own life as a woman in the Church and fictional stories about others. I studied Latter-day Saint literature in college and continue reading contemporary Latter-day Saint literature. I am on the board of the Association for Mormon Letters, an organization that promotes literature written by, for, or about those who tie back to the prophet Joseph (including members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but not exclusive to our denomination). So you might say I have some experience with portrayals of the Latter-day Saints and separate fundamentalist communities. The purpose of this series of recaps is two-fold. First, I want to summarize the series for ordinary Latter-day Saints who don’t intend to watch it so they won’t be surprised around the metaphorical watercooler this week. Second, I will catalog the series as it compares to Latter-day Saint literature more broadly. As a writer, reader, and advocate of Latter-day Saint literature, this is my home turf. I am interested to see where the show gets things right and wrong. Granted, my experience isn’t the experience of every member; like any community, Latter-day Saints are not a monolith. But I will compare the show to my personal knowledge of our community and talk about what sticks out. Without further ado, here are my impressions of the first two episodes of Under the Banner of Heaven. Episode 1, “When God Was Love”  Summary—The episode opens with Detective Pyre being called away from his family’s Pioneer Day celebrations to visit a crime scene. At an ordinary suburban house, he finds a scene of chaos with a mother (Brenda Lafferty) and her 15-month-old daughter (Erica) murdered in a gruesome way. (Luckily, we are only shown large quantities of blood on the floor and walls; the show shies away from showing the bodies, though we will get hints through dialogue about the exact method of killing.) Soon the husband (Allen Lafferty) is taken into custody, his clothes soaked in his wife’s blood. The killer claims that his wife was murdered by men with beards like “Mormon prophets” and continually ties his wife’s murder back to early church history stories, particularly Joseph and Emma marrying against her father’s will. We then get a flashback to a young Brenda. She is an energetic and ambitious young woman who transfers to BYU after being tired of “holding girl’s hair back while they puked” at her party school in Idaho. Allen introduces Brenda to his family at a large family dinner. His brothers seem both strangely attracted to her and judgmental of her for her ambition and less strict faith (caffeinated soda is mentioned). The Lafferty family band together to clear a neighbor’s land to prevent it from being seized by the federal government to build a highway. In the present, Detective Pyre’s partner Bill visits Allen’s brother Robin’s home and finds the house abandoned and papers burning. They arrest Robin after a chase through a motel. This episode depicts the First Vision. It shows Joseph going to the woods to pray and a light shining down on him. The script draws parallels between Joseph’s prayer and Robin’s prayer in the woods before he is caught by the police, which doesn’t really make much sense except that they are both kneeling in a natural setting. We also get a scene of Joseph and Emma discussing whether to marry against her father’s wishes. The show tries to make a big deal of them choosing between “God’s will” and her father’s authority, implying that the problem is that they can justify almost anything as God’s will. I found this assertion pretty strange, given that Joseph and Emma were hardly the first couple to marry against a parent’s wishes. It seems a thin justification on which to hang a condemnation of trusting God. Shibboleths—It’s apparent that the showrunners have made an effort to try to include jargon of Latter-day Saints in the dialogue. Sometimes this works: the Pyre family prayer scene feels exactly like the ones that take place in my family. Others make it apparent that the writers are not members of the community. While we do refer to God as Heavenly Father, particularly in prayer, we don’t use this term exclusively like the characters in the show. I regularly hear members refer to him as “God” or “the Lord,” and a brief search of the church’s 1980’s general conference talks shows that this isn’t a new innovation. While there is

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!