Superman Revealing S-Shield Under his Suit | The Case for Heroic Masculinity | Public Square Magazine | In Praise of Heroic Masculinity | Male Heroism | Masculine Hero

The Case for Heroic Masculinity

The problem is not that masculinity is toxic. The problem is that we have abandoned the heroic and noble masculine virtues that the world so desperately needs today.

When my little boy was four years old, he had a hard time going to school. He was in a Pre-K program and struggled tremendously with the anxiety of being away from his mama—breaking down in tears at the very idea of going to school the next day. 

I asked a therapist for help. I wasn’t sure what to expect, but at least some kind of serious therapeutic intervention.

The counselor gave me a book. A children’s book. Like, with pictures.

I was incredulous. The suggestion felt minimizing, as though my family’s dilemma was not important. My incredulity lasted until another friend, a Kindergarten teacher with plenty of experience in the ways of crying 4-year-olds, confirmed the counsel: 

“You need to read him stories.”  

But wait, I do read him stories. Plenty of them. What was I missing? You might as well have told me to look at a brazen serpent on a pole.

“They’re called social stories,” she explained. “They will give him a pattern to follow. Read him a story about how a child was nervous to go to school but was brave and how it all worked out.” 

I returned to this therapist a couple of weeks later, humbled to report that it had worked like magic. 

Like. Magic.

The story really did the trick. As it turns out, human beings are mimickers—mirroring whatever we see around us, both good and bad. And for my boy, the social story became a template to introduce a better story he could live up to.  

By small and simple things. I’m struck by how boring the most important societal solutions often are. Checklists in hospitals save lives, and exercise and good sleep are among the very best cures for a whole host of ailments (including mental ones). Yet they are overlooked precisely because they are already known—commonplace, even. And yet, they make the biggest difference of all.

You can do something morally urgent in our day. You can tell the stories of good men.

Which brings me to my point here. Somewhere, a poor saint has been asked to write a talk for Father’s Day. That person has my condolences and affection, for I once had to give a talk on Mother’s Day.

It wasn’t a bad talk. It was funny in parts and saccharine in others, and it hit the right notes—with people smiling in the right places. But it wasn’t a great talk—partly, perhaps, because of the advice I got beforehand: “Be very careful. Mother’s Day is hard. Be inclusive. And sensitive. Be sure to be kind. Don’t say anything too risky.”

Whatever compliments came afterward, I couldn’t shake the sense that it had been an utterly empty talk. When President M. Russell Ballard was asked if it is hard to give a talk at the Church’s General Conference, he said, “No. What’s hard is giving a good one.”

Preach, brother.

And so, to that poor struggling saint, who represents my tiny intended audience, here are a few words of reassurance. You have an opportunity to do something meaningful this Father’s Day. In fact, you can do something that is more than just good or encouraged or even strongly recommended; you can do something morally urgent in our day. 

You can tell the stories of good men.

Exemplary depictions. Some of our stories get this right. Let me recount two of my favorite scenes in modern cinema. You’re in for a treat, too: I’m a rather refined cinephile—no doubt due to the refined tastes of the people I choose to surround myself with. (My kids, ages 2, 5, 7, and 9.) The film in question is The Lion King. 

I asked a friend of mine which scene best portrayed masculinity in a positive light. He suggested, “It’s the one where Mufasa saves Simba, right?”

Close. It’s actually the scene directly after that one. After dispersing the ravenous hyenas and rescuing his boy with a roar, Mufasa, king of the pride lands, takes his son to the side for “a lesson.” Simba is sternly corrected by his father for putting himself (and his companions) at risk. It is a hard rebuke, even if filled with loving concern. The conversation ends with expressions of affection and playful tussling in the grass. In a moment of heavy foreshadowing, Simba asks if they will always be together. “Let me tell you something my father told me,” Mufasa says in response. “Look at the stars. The great kings of the past look down on us from those stars. So whenever you feel alone, just remember those kings will always be up there to guide you. And so will I.”

The second scene is the emotional climax of the movie: Simba, now grown, has finally come to himself. He climbs pride rock in the pouring rain, and having defeated the villainous Scar, he hears the spirit of Mufasa thunder, “Remember …” who you are. Simba takes courage and finally accepts his place as king. He roars—symbolically accepting coronation—as his kingdom roars back in assent. 

Remember these scenes. We’ll come back to them.

Masculinity is the Solution

I’m struck by a recent bit of research by Jenet Jacob Erickson, James McQuivey, and Brad Wilcox. From the article: “New research finds that the happiest and strongest women self-identify as feminine.” That’s a surprising finding: I’ve always assumed that it takes courage to reject cultural gender norms. It never struck me that it might take courage to embrace them. (And those who do appear to be better off in a number of ways.)

I can’t speak to femininity, but there is certainly a degree of courage required in embracing healthy, noble, even heroic masculinity as well—and pushing back on what the larger culture says men are by nature. Some of the tropes about men are that they are doofuses, absent, irresponsible, or angry. We hear of rebellious teen boys or grown men who still live in their mothers’ basements. Some consider toxic masculinity an inability to express emotion, a need to bottle up anger or resentment until it later explodes, harming everyone within the blast radius. Another strand of toxicity is a man who is willing to use violence to get what he wants—particularly from a woman.

To be clear, there is nothing manful about anything in these examples. It’s another case of backwardness: what we call “toxic masculinity” is most often a refusal to become a man, to shoulder responsibilities, reject resentment, and face difficulty with courage. We are calling the problem “masculinity” when most often it is “juvenility.” Masculinity isn’t the problem; it’s the solution.

Meanwhile, our culture has turned not merely against men but against the manly virtues: moral accountability, courage, responsibility, and emotional stoicism. I don’t know what makes these things manly—certainly, women can (and do) exemplify all of them—but they are too often reflected in our media as bad by default. 

Let me explain just two such examples.

1. Moral Accountability. 

When the Texas shooter’s father was asked about his son, he responded, “I don’t want them calling him a monster … they don’t know nothing, man. They don’t know anything he was going through.” This parallels his mother’s statements to “please don’t judge him” and “he had his reasons.” My heart goes out to Salvador Ramos’ parents, who plead for mercy for a son who has done unspeakable horrors. I can’t imagine the hell they have gone through. 

And yet, from a Christian perspective, mercy in the face of evil is hardly merciful to either those who suffer or even to the perpetrator himself. In contrast to this father’s pleas for mercy, the mighty Mufasa corrects and rebukes his son, positively flowing with wisdom, authority, and accountability. Excusing our most despicable acts is a form of subsidy for the very worst of our behaviors. There is nothing moral about it.

We are calling the problem “masculinity” when most often it is “juvenility.”

The story of Simba being reproved by his father is one of moral accountability. It still makes me tear up. This little scene is one of the best depictions of masculinity I have come across—starting with the depiction of a father lovingly correcting his son. There is something fundamentally right and good about a man teaching a boy to be a good man.

As the youth these days are wont to say: this scene “slaps.”

And yet, that is not the message our youth are getting. Too often, they are hearing that any kind of “authority”—especially “moral authority”—is to be held in suspicion. In a recent lesson about avoiding the perils of “permissive” teaching and “authoritarian” teaching, I highlighted the research around “authoritative” teaching that combines both love and healthy structure. I was surprised by this student’s comment: “Can’t we change the name? I don’t like how it still sounds like the word ‘authority.’”

Any kind of strong judgments or emphases on consequences or accountability are likewise quickly seen as wrongheaded. Yet we must call evil that which is evil. Now, I have no interest in judging the shooter’s parents. I do, however, judge our culture, which too often maintains that when someone has committed an act of ultimate horror, they too should be given mercy and grace. This is mercy robbing justice. It is wrong. As Isaiah said of the Messiah, “He will reprove with equity for the sake of the meek.” Moral accountability isn’t for the punished; it is for the victims. We have increasingly lost our sense of moral accountability, and to the degree that continues, it will end in more suffering, not less, and that suffering will primarily land on the meekest among us.

Good times make weak men, which make hard times, which make good men, and so the story repeats. It seems to me that we are somewhere after “weak men” and just before “hard times.” Maybe I worry too much, but my work in schools has given me ample reason to be nervous. Teachers are known to grumble. (On any given day, 80% of teachers will tell you that this is the hardest batch of kids they’ve ever had.) And yet, behind the grumbling is something more sinister; something is off. Crime is up. Drinking is up. There is a feeling that America is coming apart at the seams. We feel it in the mental health crisis, in our political friction, and in a lot of other things. We’ve gone through a pandemic, and now we face a mental health crisis, a war, and major inflation. 

I don’t think the solution is mere policy. When the pandemic came around, I said on social media that it seemed to be a good idea to repent. I wasn’t joking. (And even if I’m wrong, it never hurts.) The real solution is humbling ourselves and turning again to what is good and right, but that will require us to find again our sense of moral accountability.

2. Embracing Responsibility. 

High epic fantasy is still defined by Tolkien’s world of elves, hobbits, men, and lesser gods in The Lord of the Rings. In the final triumphant installment of the trilogy, “The Return of the King,” the heir to the throne of Gondor, a quiet, shadowy figure named Strider, fights valiantly, embraces his true identity, and finally takes his place as Aragon II Elessar, king of Gondor.  

That saga about a man who decides to accept his role as king is, of course, the same story as Simba climbing Pride rock. They both depict a manliness that is inherently about accepting responsibility. In contrast to yet another much-debated statement by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez about “toxic masculinity” in the wake of this Texas shooting, she wasn’t just wrong. She had things backward.

I have a difficult time seeing such evil as school shootings as anything but a tantrum—throwing a fit, but with a gun. There is nothing manful about it, nothing decent nor masculine. Manliness and masculinity are about accepting responsibility and rejecting resentment, not the reverse. 

One of the benefits of speaking more of heroic masculinity is that it displaces the counterfeits. Returning to another cinematic example, among the great complaints about the portrayal of Anakin Skywalker in the prequels was that he was boring: He was just an angry teenager, a loser who refused to grow up. Little wonder, then, that he became the equivalent of a sith school shooter. Look, too, at the mediocre manager who shows his authority by flexing his bureaucratic muscles, the gym rat who shows how manly he is with literal muscles, or the jock who does it by being a “player.” If you want these stories to die, you have to do more than not tell them; you have to actively replace them. 

In The Lord of the Rings, Aragorn is more than a character; he’s a symbol—of bravery, of authority, and of the goodness that can be man’s. This is precisely the kind of story we need to hear more about. Heroic masculinity isn’t merely being a “manly man,” it’s being a good one—a godly man, a decent one, a trustworthy man, and a self-controlled one; courageous, true, and devoted to things that are far above himself. 

Simba leaves behind a childhood of Hakuna Matata and finally turns toward responsibility. Strider rises again to become Aragorn, the true ruler of Gondor. Both embrace their birthright and obligation to duty and self-sacrifice, finally taking their rightful places as mighty kings. They accept the burden of responsibility. 

Heroic Masculinity: The Return of the Kings

I asked a friend of mine what the “opposite of toxic masculinity” was. I was hoping for a word like “healthy” or “positive” or “noble” or even “heroic,” but instead, she said something far more brilliant: “Aragorn.”

She pointed me to a brilliant Cinema Therapy video that I recommend enthusiastically. It discusses toxic masculinity and how Aragorn is the opposite of it. He shows emotions. He treats women with respect. He is valiant and brave and courageous but equally humble. He is a master swordsman and poet. 

And while I give the highest marks to cinematherapy for their work, it struck me that the best word they had for Aragorn was merely “non-toxic.” I think we can do better.

Masculinity isn’t the problem; it’s the solution.

Representative Ocasio-Cortez also spoke of “healthy masculinity.” Yes. This. Shout it from the rooftops. We won’t win if we simply use the bad terms less: We need a positive tale to fill the void. If you prefer “noble masculinity” or “healthy masculinity” or “godly masculinity,” then go for it. I’m partial to “heroic masculinity” because it carries the same rhetorical force as its toxic opposite. It says that you can be good, special, and important by being decent and manly. We need a better term like this—especially for fathers like me who are raising sons (I need it equally, I think, for my daughter, but that is a discussion for another day.)

That’s why it’s so important to tell the stories of good men. If stories communicate values in such a crucial way, the stories of good men communicate what makes good men. We need those now more than ever and come Father’s Day, you will have the chance to tell those stories. I hope you will. I hope my sons will hear them.

In addition to Aragon’s story, don’t forget Theoden, king of Rohan, has been warped by the whispers of the accursed Grima Wormtongue—occupying the throne as a mere shadow of his former self—confused, twisted, and impotent. It is not until Gandalf dismisses Wormtongue and banishes the evil curse from the king that he finally regains his full stature and faculties.

The title could have been set as plural. It’s not about the return of a king but the return of kings. It is the story of the return of good men. Indeed, the end of the trilogy heralds “the age of men.”

How we need such a return and such an age today! Our deepest stories, our holy stories, are patterns too. In the restored gospel of Christ, we are taught that our gender is eternal, a core part of both our identity and also our purpose. Men have a noble birthright as sons of a Heavenly King: A future rich with the potential of mighty and majestic roles if we can but become the men worthy of them. In describing those who receive the higher priesthood “after the order of the Only Begotten Son,” the Lord states, “They are they into whose hands the Father has given all things—They are they who are priests and kings, who have received of his fulness, and of his glory.” This is the promise of God’s kingdom on earth that “Every man will be a king” (and every woman a queen), as declared stirringly in “One Day More” from Les Miserables

When Father’s Day comes, I hope you will take the opportunity to do something truly good: Tell stories far and wide of the best men. 

About the author

Benjamin Pacini

Benjamin Pacini is a husband, father of four, and faculty at BYU-Idaho in Elementary Education. He served as a teacher and administrator in Baltimore City and Washington D.C. for ten years. He is currently pursuing an EdD from BYU.
On Key

You Might Also Like

In Awe of Creation

When was the last time you felt awe for what you see, feel, and experience around you? As easy as it is to fixate on the negatives around us, don’t miss out on the sweetness of relishing the jaw-dropping goodness and beauty all around us too.

Kingmen on January 6th

The Committee Hearings on January 6th have been ignored as a political ploy by many Americans, including people of faith. That’s a mistake.

The Room Next Door Review

“The Room Next Door” is the latest example of arthouse social engineering.  The film is about a troubled woman, Martha, who in the midst of cancer treatments decides to commit suicide. If this bothers you, the film implies, it is because there is something wrong with you. This is all the more troubling, because the film, in many ways, is beautiful. It is directed by Pedro Almodóvar, one of the most acclaimed living film directors, in his first full-length film in English. And you can’t help but be taken by the beauty of it all. The film is suffused with the soft colors of the woods. Despite being an entire screenplay full of little except two friends talking, the camera work keeps the film alive and moving. And Julianne Moore and Tilda Swinton who play Ingrid and Martha once again give impeccable, engaging performances, that you can’t help but admire.  But all the beauty in this film is in service of a story that is decidedly ugly—but not self-awarely so. Our two main characters are old friends who met as young writers. Ingrid has published a best seller recently, where she writes about how she can’t accept death. On her publicity tour, she learns that Martha is in the hospital with cancer. She goes to visit her and reignite their friendship. We learn through the conversations that these characters aren’t bad people, necessarily, they just struggle to see a world outside of their own desires and consciousness. They have repeatedly avoided building relationships or having families. Martha does have a daughter. But she chased her father away, then lied to her about who he was her whole life, and then proceeded to be an absent mother so she could chase the romanticism of being a war correspondent.  Now that she is sick and dying, she notices that she has no one in her life. The movie comments on this like an unusual quirk, rather than the inevitable result of a life of bad decisions. We learn early on that cancer treatment can be a roller coaster with euphoric peaks, and miserable nadirs. During one such rut, Martha purchases a suicide pill, and decides she will kill herself. She reaches out to Ingrid and asks her to come on vacation with her, so that she will have someone in the house when she does it.  Ingrid agrees. And although she early on expresses some discomfort, she quickly respects Martha’s wishes to largely pretend nothing is happening. They have a lovely vacation in upstate New York watching old movies and reading books. While they are there, Ingrid reconnects with Damien (John Turturo) an ex-boyfriend of both hers and Martha’s. He is horrified at the state of the world, and seems to only live for sex (or to constantly talk about sex.) Damien is not a sympathetic character, and perhaps the audience is supposed to read that his unpleasant and helpless politics are akin to Martha’s helpless approach to life. If so the audience hardly has time to ponder it under a heavy heaping of affirmations about the power to choose, and the dignity to die.  Eventually, Martha does exactly what she promised to do. There is a brief police investigation where the officer (Alessandro Nivola) expresses concern that Ingrid would have knowingly not gotten help for her friend. A lawyer comes and helpfully tells the audience we can ignore that concern because he is a religious fanatic. This is the kind of movie that alludes to James Joyce not just once but three times. It is so pleased with just how artsy it is. And for a film with a message like “life isn’t worth fighting for,” the best comfort is that it’s so artsy not a lot of people will watch it.  The only people I would recommend watching this film is for those studying how society has devalued human life, and how good tools can be misused to harm people. The film is rated PG-13. It includes several normalized same-sex relationships, and some joking about polyamorous relationships. But obviously the biggest warning is the way it normalizes and glamorizes suicide. If you watch it with older teenagers, I would focus on questions about the choice that Martha made, and how family and relationships could have helped her make better choices. I might ask about how Ingrid could have been a better or more caring friend. One out of five stars. “The Room Next Door” will be released in theaters nationwide January 17, 2025.