A solitary figure walking to a church captures the determination of religious devotion despite its demands.

The High Demands of the Devoted: “Why Do They Do It?”

How do faith demands become blessings? Devotion fosters stronger bonds with God, family, and community, transforming sacrifices into profound rewards.
Special Note From the Authors: When Orthodox Jews write the Divine Name, they typically write it “G-d” out of respect. When using their words, we follow this practice.

On their long, difficult, and sometimes discouraging journey far from the comforts of the Shire, Tolkien’s Samwise Gamgee told Frodo Baggins to remember the old stories: “Folk in those stories had lots of chances of turning back, only they didn’t. They kept going. Because they were holding on to something.” Those of us walking together on the long, difficult, and sometimes discouraging journey of faith may each ask ourselves the questions: “Why should we refuse to turn back?” or “How can we encourage others to continue the journey?”

For a devoted person of faith in a contemporary culture that tends to view such folks with mild derision if not contempt, it becomes clear that numerous sacrifices are required that are not typically expected of most people. Accordingly, members of society can reasonably pose questions about highly religious individuals who give both time and money for their faith. Two of the leading sociologists of religion, Rodney Stark and Roger Finke, have stated the biggest question of all regarding the highly religious: “Why do they do it?”

In this brief article, drawn from an in-depth study published in Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, entitled “Why Do the Devout Remain Devoted?” we will discuss the most common themes about the demands and costs of religion and note the explanations that highly religious participants offered regarding “why they do it.” 

As relational scholars interested in the ways religion and family relationships influence each other, we interviewed 198 racially diverse and religiously devoted families in the American Families of Faith project. Participants reportedly viewed the required costs of religion as “worth it” for various reasons, including the relational benefits they perceived as a result. Below we summarize some of those findings.

Research on Required Costs of Religion 

Many participants did not report the costs of religion as a sacrifice but tended to discuss their efforts to fulfill the expectations of their religion as something that they felt they should inherently do. For such persons, the “demands” imposed by religion were not burdensome loads to bear. Instead, these demands were often viewed as noble aspirations that participants wanted and that religion structurally outlined and then facilitated.  Three related themes involved: (a) marital expectations, (b) parent/child expectations, and (c) individual expectations. We will discuss each of these, along with illustrative participant quotes. 

Marital expectations included many participants reflecting on their firm desire to marry someone within their own religious denomination. A Conservative Jewish husband named Daniel talked about the importance of marriage within Judaism; he said, 

Being Jewish within a family of Jews was really important, and marrying Jewish was real important to me. I wanted to be married to someone who had as much in common with me as possible…. There’s a certain framework for life and marriage in Judaism. 

Other expectations consisted of conduct within the marital relationship. The meaning of marriage was expressed by a Christian husband named Mark, who said, “We believe that the marriage is created through vows. Vows are a covenant before God. Therefore, we have vowed before God that we would stay married.” For participants, such vows and covenants made were expected to be upheld and honored with fidelity, along with expectations to care for children born into the marriage. Yes, these are responsibilities … but they were welcomed ones.

Parent and child expectations, in most cases, consisted of the responsibility a parent felt to raise their children in the faith. Mahmoud, an Arab Shi’a Muslim father, expounded, “I think as parents, we should take care of the kids because there are rules that we have in our religion that parents are responsible to raise their kids [with] both morals and religion. It is [the parents’] responsibility.” 

Children in these families were also reportedly taught to follow the commandment to “Honor thy father and thy mother.” Jing, an Asian Christian husband, explained,

We br[ought] our kids to church and Sunday school. We read the Bible to them when they were young. This summer, my father was ill. I went back to China to take care of him. I have this responsibility to take care of my parents. Like the teachings in the Bible: “respect your parents” …. [My] children would learn and know how to treat their parents later. We should [always] respect our parents.

Religious expectations, however, are not only familial or marital. Individual expectations were often discussed in “shoulds” and “supposed to(s)” among participants. An Orthodox Jewish husband, Saul, said, 

[T]here’s a conduct you have to maintain, and there’s a modesty you have to maintain. And there’s ethics … this is how you are supposed to be, and you know in your heart and your mind that it really is G-d’s way; it’s the intended way. It’s the right way, that you’re doing the example, of living the example you are supposed to be.

In summary, some of the costs of religious devotion were alternately framed by devotees as lofty expectations or noble aims worthy of pursuit. Our research found that many religious individuals embrace these “expenses,” not as costs but as a pathway to a higher way of living and relating. 

Research on Relational Benefits from Religion

We will now further discuss reported motivations behind why some highly religious individuals desire to uphold these expectations. Relational compensators (or benefits) were the most apparent “blessing” that participants reported. The most frequently identified blessings from devotion included improvements in (a) family relationships, (b) their relationship with God, and (c) relationships in the faith community. Jocelyn, a Black Baptist wife and mother, said, 

[B]eing involved in church has strengthened my family [and] my marriage…. [T]he most important thing that [church] has done is helped us as a family and with our marital relationship, our raising of the children and bringing them, leading them, to Christ. There’s just no way that would have happened outside of a relationship in the church. 

A Christian father named Andy also talked about how his relationship with God provided him comfort and peace. He disclosed, 

I think … [our faith] provides a security blanket. You know that no matter what’s going on around you, there is some constant that’s there, and that’s God. You know that He’s never changing, and He’s going to be there. And we can bring all of our problems and cares to Him. And there is that foundation that … it’s unmovable. It’s not going to be shifted around with whatever is going on in the rest of the world. 

Many participants emphasized that their religious community provided deeply supportive relationships that they compared to extended “family.” Aaliyah, an Arab Muslim wife and mother, remarked how she viewed her faith community, 

That’s a special bond. You … feel like you are part of an extended family, [a] much bigger family … because when it comes down to [it], when we have a death in the family [or] somebody gives birth, they come together. They come and visit you. They’ll come and cook for you, that support is there…. With the community, when you are involved in the community, and you participate, and when you are in a time of need, then they come to you and give you that support. 

Not only did participants receive these benefits, but they also reported providing these benefits to others inside and outside their families. A Catholic husband and father named Malcolm illustrated this point beautifully, 

We have a motto in our community, “Make a friend, be a friend, bring a friend to [Christ].” And if you open yourself up and you are aware, and you try to be there when somebody needs help, then usually it does start friendship, and it usually grows. 

Many participants felt that when they chose to serve in their faith community, they were more than equally reimbursed for their time and effort in new or fortified relationships. Timothy, a nondenominational Christian, said, “We need each other to bless each other and build each other up and encourage each other and support each other and teach each other and all that stuff…. The unity, that’s what [God] wants.” Timothy’s reflection illustrates the Christian ideal that “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”

Again, a sense of increased unity with family, God, and the faith community reportedly strengthened many study participants in ways that were found to be worth the sacrifice of religious “costs.” 

Expectations and Benefits Build Each Other

One complex finding from our study leads us to believe that both religious expectations (costs) and relational compensators (benefits) do not function alone, but in tandem. Specifically, many religious demands or expectations also allegedly served as relationship strengtheners and fortifiers. Tucker, a father and husband from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, offered examples of expectations that lead to relational benefits. He stated, 

Whether it be keeping our [religion’s] “Word of Wisdom” which [tells us to] avoid alcoholic drinks and tobacco, [harmful drugs], coffee, tea, etc., [or] whether it be in [paying] tithing and keeping the Sabbath day holy and all these principles that are [not in line with mainstream] culture, you have to make some pretty serious commitments in order to be an active Latter-day Saint. [But] as a result of those commitments … you can go anywhere in the world as a Latter-day Saint and go into a congregation, and you will be welcomed as a family member, a long-lost family member. Someone will put their arm around you and welcome you.

For Tucker, the difficult demands and “pretty serious commitments” of his faith seem to be the dues to a cherished community that serves as a “family.”

A Seventh-day Adventist wife, Carmen, talked about her purpose in life and articulated, “You’re not here for yourself. You’re here to do, to live your life for God’s service and for other people.” Carmen struck a chord that related to the experience of the other families of faith. Many participants reportedly felt how the weighty expectation of providing service and support to others was directly correlated to the benefits that they witnessed in their own lives. 

One father we interviewed allowed us to step onto his sacred ground by discussing his beloved daughter Megan who had passed away at age six following an extended battle with leukemia. Her father recalled:

[My wife and I] went to give blood at a blood drive [at our church], and our [Bishop] was there giving blood. He’d visited Megan in the hospital a couple of times and prayed with her. … Megan went over and held his hand while he had that blood drawn, because she knew what it was like to have needles poked in your skin, and she felt for him. She couldn’t do much, but she could hold his hand, and she did that. The impact that has on me just tells me that a little bit of loving concern for others goes a long way, not just in the life of either person in the interaction but in the people who see that. It makes you want to go forth and do likewise. 

Like this father, inspired by his daughter, many American Families of Faith participants did not see service solely as a burden but rather as a source of meaning. Indeed, many reportedly viewed these religious expectations of serving others through giving money, time, and energy as an effective avenue to give blessings to others and also to themselves. We are reminded of the words of Dorothy Dix, “Make no mistake about it, responsibilities toward other human beings are the greatest blessings God can send us.”

Tolkien’s wizard Gandalf said, “Some believe it is only great power that can hold evil in check. But that is not what I’ve found. I found it is the small things. Everyday deeds by ordinary folk that keeps the darkness at bay.” These “small things” and “deeds” of service seem to have helped many of the highly religious individuals we interviewed to find deeper purpose. 

Conclusion

In closing, we return to Stark and Finke’s burning question about the highly devoted: “Why do they do it?” From some participants, enriched relationships with family, God, and their faith community were seen as compensators or blessings that were well worth the sacrifice, the trouble, the labors of the journey, and the “fight” with the world. Such persons and families, like Samwise Gamgee, believe “that there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.”

About the authors

Loren Marks

Loren D. Marks, Ph.D. is professor of Family Life at BYU, co-director of the American Families of Faith project, and co-author of Psychology of Religion and Families. He is a Fellow at the Wheatley Institute.

David Dollahite

David C. Dollahite, Ph.D., is professor of Family Life at BYU, co-director of the American Families of Faith project, and co-author of Strengths in Diverse Families of Faith.

Savannah Lowe

Savannah Lowe is a student in the BYU School of Family Life.

Ellie R. Kimball

Ellie R. Kimball works in the Division of Epidemiology at the University of Utah as a Research Analyst.
On Key

You Might Also Like

A Gospel Foundation for Common Ground on Social Justice

Social justice has become a point of aching division in America, and even among Latter-day Saints—with different sides claiming Jesus’s message as justifying their own view. Could that same gospel, however, offer some ways to find vital common ground instead?

Kinda Pregnant, Kinda Forgettable, Mostly Raunchy

Amy Schumer is a mood.  About ten years ago it seemed like she was about to break out as the next great all-American comedian. But her material never softened. She never found a safe sitcom to mold her jokes into something that would be network-approved. She had her hard stand-up audience and she kept it. “Kinda Pregnant” is perhaps the most Amy Schumer film yet made, and certainly the most since “Trainwreck.” If you like the Amy-Schumer schtick, I imagine you will like this movie. The film is mostly an extension of Schumer’s 2019 special “Growing,” in which she talked about her own pregnancy and her experience with it.  In this film we learn that Schumer’s character Lainy has always wanted to be a mom, but she is now forty and her boyfriend is finally ready to propose. But alas he wasn’t proposing marriage, but proposing having sex with another woman. She soon learns that her best friend Kate is pregnant. Worried that Kate is becoming closer friends with their also pregnant co-worker, Lainy tries on a fake pregnancy belly at a maternity store, and when the clerk accidentally sees her wearing it and is very kind, Lainy decides she’ll pretend to be pregnant. She goes to a pregnancy yoga class, and meets Megan who she makes instant friends with. This means Lainy is living a split life, one pregnant and one unpregnant. There is not a lot of territory left to mine in the fake pregnancy category. Between “Glee,” “Gone Girl,” “Labor Pains,” “Preggoland,” “Desperate Housewives,” and “Baby Mama” the plot device has gone from comedy to drama to action and back again. In typical Schumer fashion she goes gross-out raunchy, which occasionally lapses into a serious talk about the physical and emotional realities of pregnancy and how society treats them.  On that final front, the film does have some interesting observations. The physical realities of pregnancy are weirdly under-discussed, for a society that seems to hold pregnancy as a high honor. But ultimately whatever positive message was there falls apart for two reasons. First the film wants to celebrate family and child birth, but feels the constant need to hedge its endorsement so as not to risk Schumer’s progressive bona fides. And the entire thing is lost in a cavalcade of profanity and gross out jokes about everything from masturbation to farting. I watched “Dog Man” a few weeks ago, a movie for 8-year-old boys, and I’m honestly not sure which movie had more juvenile fart jokes.  The movie does have a few very funny scenes, but for a Happy Madison production, it’s unusually slow. And the writing doesn’t give us the kind of endlessly quotable lines Happy Madison is usually known for. In terms of the comedy, the movie is less bad and more just forgettable. The movie has a very female sensibility, given its subject matter, but it’s presented with the kind of raunchy comedy that has a smaller female audience. If you love Amy Schumer’s comedy, especially if you’ve loved her more recent materials, and you have recently had a baby and feel like no one else really gets what you’re going through, there is a good chance this movie will be among your favorites. Though I’d still recommend using a service that will clean up the worst excesses of the vulgarity—this is a film that earns its R-rating. But if you aren’t in that small group, I imagine the movie might amuse you, but otherwise it will leave you feeling insipid and put off.  One and a half out of five stars. “Kinda Pregnant” premiers on Netflix today, February 5, 2025.

Trauma in The Family of Abraham

The story of Abraham sacrificing Isaac teaches obedience, but believers can benefit from wrestling with this text, as Jews have done for centuries.