kyiv_ukraine_temple_lds (1)

We Can’t Even Agree on Vladimir Putin?

If we can’t even agree about the threatened invasion of a democratic, sovereign nation playing out before us, what does that say about our own condition as an American people?
A temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Kiev, Ukraine.

Every once in a while—even in our contentious times—there is an inchoate sense in the air … of a unity so close we can almost taste it.  

From our shared fear and concern about getting through the disastrous pandemic to a shared sorrow and revulsion at the Afghani suffering following our withdrawal, in moments like this, we don’t seem to be all that far from a deeper unity as an American people.  

Until we look closer. With a free, sovereign nation that has openly embraced many Western ideals of democracy now surrounded by an overwhelming horde of Russian troops, you would think we would be close to that kind of unity this week. Indeed, when we started this staff piece, our working title was “A Rare Moment of American Unity?”

Until that is, we started reading more closely the national discourse. Although a surprising number of Republicans and Democrats are united in condemnation for actions taken by the Russian army, one Republican Senate candidate notably said, “I gotta be honest with you, I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another.”

Are we really our Ukrainian brother’s keeper?

This candidate went on to boast of his priorities being exclusively in his own community. After all, is he really his Ukrainian brother’s keeper?

Former secretary of state Mike Pompeo called President Putin “very talented” as a statesman—and someone who should be respected because he “knows how to use power.” Even more notably (and inexplicably), former President Trump took this dire moment—to be clear, prior to the more overt invasion—to praise Vladimir Putin’s recent actions (yes, watch for yourself) as “genius” and “smart” and “pretty savvy” and “wonderful.”

Lastly, Tucker Carlson chimed in to scold people for hating Vladimir Putin too much, reminding them of all the reasons that liberals in America were far worse than he was. While it’s true we need to be cautious about intense emotions such as hatred, it’s important to not overlook how repeatedly scripture encourages believers to “hate evil” and “hate sin.” 

Even in a day when “good is evil” and “evil is good,” surely this is still something we can find meaningful common ground … especially when any overt violence is concerned (rape, abuse, invasion of another country). 

To be clear, a great number of American conservatives are as shocked as liberal-leaning folks at the aggression we are all witnessing.  President Joe Biden said in a brief statement yesterday at the White House, “Who in the Lord’s name does Putin think gives him the right to declare new so-called countries on territory that belonged to his neighbors?” 

It’s definitely not the Lord, the Prince of Peace. 

Prayers for brothers and sisters in Ukraine. In 1994, the Ukrainian state gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for guarantees from Russia, the United States and other western countries that they would never “use force or threats against Ukraine and all would respect its sovereignty and existing borders.”  That agreement included reassurances for international action if any country did try to use force against them.

Yet as everyone inside Ukraine knows, no one is coming to defend the Ukrainian people. As the international community looks on in horror, they will be required to fight for themselves.  The New York Times described “many civilians joining territorial defense units across the country” and “lines outside of recruitment centers.” 

Imagine having to make those kinds of decisions with your family over the dinner table?  

Within this beautiful country of 42 million waiting with bated breath, there are over 11K Latter-day Saints spread out across 48 congregations (8 wards and 40 branches) across nearly every major city. A temple—considered the House of the Lord in our faith—has been dedicated and active since 2010. 

We pray for these Saints, as we do all the mothers and fathers, husbands and wives—and especially the children—who will no doubt have difficulty falling asleep in many nights ahead of them, and even more difficulty when they wake up.  

To one of our own friends living in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv, we offered a place to stay in Utah (she is resolute about remaining). What else more can we do aside from donating to refugees and praying?

Reaching for a moment of possible unity. It’s fair to wonder whether this whole Ukraine mess would have happened if our current White House administration had made different choices in Afghanistan.  It’s also fair to wonder (like many on the political right), how the different entanglements of the President himself and his son have influenced the situation. It’s equally fair to wonder (as do many on the political left) how the previous administration’s hands-off approach to Putin’s prior efforts to undo western military support for Ukraine also plays into this dire moment. But before we get carried off into yet more of the endless partisan bickering (about pretty much everything), can we not appreciate the potential way this could be a rare moment of unity? 

Vladimir Putin has done what no one else seems to be able to do — unite leaders of the free world. Yet in the United States, up until this very moment, that unity has been elusive, with much of the rhetoric focused on attacking President Biden more than President Putin.

Now that the invasion has commenced, there are signals of unity emerging.  When was the last time you saw Republicans and Democrats even tempted to be united? 

Maybe at the beginning of the pandemic. For sure, 9/11.  And perhaps again now? As Sen. John McCain said in 2014, during the last Russian invasion of Ukraine, “We are all Ukrainians.”

By many measures, President Biden has shown some steady and reassuring leadership during this crisis—and we can be grateful for that. In addition to providing significant military resources for Ukraine, the president has had to grapple with enormously sensitive dynamics of our own involvement. When explaining why American soldiers would not be intervening for now, he emphasized, “That’s a world war when Americans and Russia start shooting at one another.”

 We are all Ukrainians.”

There is some wisdom to appreciate here. Yet we’ve been surprised and saddened at the reluctance among some conservatives to concede any positive steps in the current administration—and the attempt to unify around only one thing: blaming President Biden for everything. In a moment when we could at least empathize for the difficult burden of leadership our current president carries, Tucker Carlson went out of his way to remind viewers of the president’s senility and took pains to mock the folksy language of his vice president.

Don’t let yourself get pulled into the partisan vortex so much that your mind is no longer able to see any good in your political opposite. If we can no longer see any such virtues even in a difficult moment of real courage and resolve, what does that really say about us?  

We can do better. Let’s do that. All of us.

About the author

Public Square Staff

Our core team, including our Editor, Managing Editor, Communications and Media Directors, Visual Display Director and Copy Editor.
On Key

You Might Also Like

A reflection on violence in film

Gladiator II is a serviceable historical epic. If you loved Gladiator, you’ll like Gladiator II. Gladiator II opens as Rome is about to siege the “last free city in Africa.” Our nameless hero loses valiantly with his wife dying in the battle, and he is brought to be a slave in Rome. But if our hero can perform well enough as a gladiator, he can buy his own freedom. And with that, we’re off. The beats of this film will be familiar, with a massive twist only halfway through that changes the stakes for everyone. Our hero is really the son of our hero from the last movie! Which means he has a legitimate claim to the throne of Rome. The movie tries to follow three different stories. Our hero (Paul Mescal) is trying to win his freedom and avenge his wife’s death. Acacius (Pedro Pascal), the general of the armies, wants respite and time with his wife; he also wants to lead a coup against the emperors. Macrinus (Denzel Washington) wants to work his way up in Roman power through political scheming. And then on top of all of that, we are told that our hero must deal with his father’s legacy and discover who he truly is.  It’s a lot, even for an epic, and the screenplay is not nearly tight enough to keep all the storylines coherent and moving. We are led to believe that Macrinus is successful in maneuvering to the top of Roman society because of his exceptional political skill, and Denzel Washington’s delicious performance makes that believable, but all we actually see him do is win a bet and carry out an assassination. Pedro Pascal’s excellent work as the weary general does some of the work in helping reconcile the contradictions in his character, but a look on his face here or there has to carry a lot that a simple conversation could have fleshed out.  Perhaps the reason the script doesn’t have time to breathe is also its biggest contradiction. There is something grotesque about watching audiences cheer on the brutal violence taking place in the film. And yet, the entire film is centered on having us, the audience, watch one set piece of over-the-top violence after another. We don’t get to see Macrinus manipulate the Roman senate because, instead, we need to see our hero fighting with CGI rhinos or CGI sharks. There is a place for violence in a moral movie. It can be helpful to attune our senses to recoil from violence or recognize the rare places it is justified. But the violence on display in Gladiator II is so relentless and gratuitous that it dulls the senses instead.  This is not to diminish the craftsmanship that has been used to bring this world and its many battle scenes to light. Rome feels broad and alive in true epic fashion, and it’s easy to get swept away into its world—with the exception of a few uncharacteristic pieces of clunky CGI work. The opening battle sequence is perhaps the best ever put to screen.  The best part of Gladiator II was its opening. A 1950s style opening credits are shown over a lavish dreamy animated retelling of the first film. Everything about it screams that something epic is about to be shown. But throughout the movie I stayed fixated on what it could have been. What if it had been more focused on the characters I cared about? What if it didn’t try to connect so much plot to the previous film and let this story stand on its own merits? What if they had expanded it to a TV miniseries so that its many plot points had space to breathe? In the end, despite some good acting and a beautiful setting, the movie just left so much to be wanted.  Gladiator II is R-rated. It is not appropriate for children or, in my estimation, most adults. At its core, this film has a moral message: life is hard, but it’s worth fighting for. But the way it’s presented on screen does more to drag down the spirit than to lift it up. Two and a half out of five stars. Gladiator II opens nationwide November 22, 2024.