books

Bites of the Best Books: November 2020

Five books that contain sentences and paragraphs and pages full of unique ideas that move our minds, touch our hearts, and fill our souls with light.

Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks

Our politics are fractured and our ability to agree is on life support. Even so, Rabbi Sacks is a prophet of cautious hope for what lies ahead. Societal division, fragmentation, extremism, unequal economics, and anger are not, he argues, inevitable. “They have been the legacy of the misplaced belief that societies can function without a moral bond. They cannot, or at least not for long. That is why we are where we are.”

The quest to restore morality is simple, he says, compared to solving other complex global challenges, such as climate change. 

“It begins with us,” Rabbi Sacks writes. “We do not need to wait for a great political leader, or an upturn in the economy, or a new mood in society, or an unexpected technological breakthrough to begin to change the moral climate within which we live and move and have our being.” He adds that morality “cannot be outsourced. It is about taking responsibility, not handing it away. All it needs is for us to think about the ‘We,’ not just the ‘I,’ and immediately we change the tenor of our relationships.”

The Consolation of Philosophy

Boethius

This brilliant work of the sixth century A.D. has many things to say to the inhabitants of 2020. A prisoner, penning lines of lament over his unjust incarceration, is visited by Lady Philosophy. In verse, she shares time-tested wisdom to help him endure his trial with more resilience.

He who keeps composure in a life well-ordered,
Who thrusts underfoot fate’s arrogant incursions,
Confronts with integrity both good and evil fortune,
Succeeds in maintaining an undefeated outlook—
He will not be moved by the wild threats of ocean
Spilling out and churning up waves from deep recesses.

She helps the prisoner see through the mirage of political power.

Why … do wretched men stand awe-struck at tyrants?
Savage though they be, their mad rage has no real power.
If we renounce all fear and expectation,
Intemperate anger will be stripped of all its weapons.
But he who all atremble is fearful or desirous,
Through lack of inward staunchness or self-mastery,
Has thrown away his shield, and deserted his station.
He forges the chains which confine his shackled progress.

Later, in dialogue with the prisoner, she helps him rise high enough above his wretchedness to recognize the good things in his life.

“You are truly fortunate if only you would acknowledge your blessings; for while men are concerned above all to preserve their lives, no one doubts that the blessings which even now you enjoy are dearer than life itself. So come now, dry your tears. Fortune does not yet direct her hatred against all your household. The storm which has gathered over you is not too hard to endure, for your anchors still hold fast, and their grip is such that they do not allow present consolation or future hope to disappear. … Nothing is wretched unless you account it so, and conversely, the lot of all who bear it with tranquility is blessed.”

Solid counsel for all sides during a time of political hysteria and pandemic-induced paranoia.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Harriet Beecher Stowe

To read through the sufferings of Tom is to encounter one of the most profound symbols of the suffering and resilient Christ in all of literature outside of the New Testament. In one scene, Tom is stiff with the wounds and bruises suffered from a severe beating for his refusal to abuse other slaves. He is in conversation with Cassy, a fellow slave who has been sexually exploited for five years by their current master, Simon Legree. Cassy succors Tom with much-needed water in his hour of need. But she also tries to convince him that his refusal to obey Legree is futile, that Tom will not have the strength to endure such abuse for long. Why not give in? Why not make life easy for himself and obey Legree’s demands? 

“What are these miserable low dogs you work with, that you should suffer on their account?” Cassy asks. “Every one of them would turn against you the first time they got a chance. They are all of ‘em as low and cruel to each other as they can be; there’s not use in your suffering to keep from hurting them.”

But Tom, his mind always immersed in the truths of the Bible, treat’s Cassy’s taunts the same way Christ treated the devil’s temptations in Matthew 4—with a scripturally rooted, teeth-gritting, hope-filled endurance to the very end.

“I’ve lost everything in this world, and it’s clean gone, forever,” Tom tells Cassy. “And now I can’t lose Heaven, too; no, I can’t get to be wicked, besides all!” 

“But it can’t be that the Lord will lay sin to our account,” Cassy rejoins. “He’ll charge it to them that drove us to it.”

“Yes,” Tom says, “but that won’t keep us from growing wicked.”

“But why does He put us where we can’t help but sin?” Cassy asks. 

“I think we can help it,” Tom says.

The Problem of Pain

C.S. Lewis

In this brief book, C.S. Lewis helps us understand a little more of what Jesus may have meant when he described as “blessed” all those in various states of want.

“Everyone has noticed how hard it is to turn our thoughts to God when everything is going well with us,” Lewis writes. “We ‘have all we want’ is a terrible saying when ‘all’ does not include God. We find God an interruption. As St. Augustine says somewhere, ‘God wants to give us something but cannot, because our hands are full—there’s nowhere for Him to put it.’ … What then can God do in our interests but make ‘our own life’ less agreeable to us, and take away the plausible sources of false happiness? It is just here, where God’s providence seems at first to be most cruel, that the Divine humility, the stooping down of the Highest, most deserves praise.”

From experience, many of us know “the terrible necessity of tribulation is only too clear,” Lewis continues. “God has had me for but forty-eight hours and then only by dint of taking everything away from me. Let Him but sheathe that sword for a moment and I behave like a puppy when the hated bath is over—I shake myself as dry as I can and race off to reacquire my comfortable dirtiness, if not in the nearest manure heap, at least in the nearest flower bed. And that is why tribulation cannot cease until God either sees us remade or sees that our remaking is now hopeless.”

The real problem, Lewis later adds, is “not why some humble, pious, believing people suffer, but why some do not.”

The Unwomanly Face of War

Svetlana Alexievich

This book is an oral history of the experiences of Soviet women who participated in World War II. They fought on the front lines, on the home front, and in occupied territories. Given the time and circumstances, the stories are full of pain and sorrow. But even in the illogical horror of war, we can see the gift of love spring through the rubble in startling ways.

“You never know your own heart,” says Natalya Ivanovna Sergeeva, a private and nurse-aid during the war. “In winter some captive German soldiers were led past our unit. They walked along all frozen, with torn blankets on their heads, holes burnt in their overcoats. It was so cold that birds dropped in flight. The birds froze. A soldier was marching in that column. … A young boy … There were tears frozen on his face … And I was taking bread to the mess in a wheelbarrow. He couldn’t take his eyes off that wheelbarrow; he didn’t see me, only the wheelbarrow. Bread … Bread … I broke a piece off a loaf and gave it to him. He took it … Took it and didn’t believe it … He didn’t believe it! I was happy … I was happy that I wasn’t able to hate. I was astonished at myself then.”

Albina Alexandrovna Gantimurova, a sergeant major and scout, describes a similar experience in Berlin with a boy who ran toward her near the end of the war. Both were armed with submachine guns.

“He looked at me, blinked, and burst into tears. I couldn’t believe it—I was in tears, too,” she says. “I felt so sorry for him; there was this kid standing with his stupid submachine gun. And I shoved him toward a wrecked building, under the gateway: ‘Hide,’ I said. He was afraid I was going to shoot him right then—I was wearing a hat, it wasn’t clear if I was a girl or a man. He took my hand. He cried! I patted his head. He was dumbstruck. It was war after all. … I was dumbstruck myself! I had hated them for the entire war! Fair or unfair, it’s still disgusting to kill, especially in the last days of the war.”

About the author

Samuel B. Hislop

Samuel B. Hislop is a writer in Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Demanding Conversations About Violence

In the weeks since the premiere of the Under the Banner of Heaven miniseries, there has been a broad consensus that the show doesn’t quite work. Its attempt to paint Latter-day Saints as promoting violence just doesn’t land. And its depiction of Latter-day Saints simply doesn’t resonate because it’s too dissimilar. This of course must come as some disappointment to critics of the Church who had hoped the series would prompt more conversations around the issues they deem problematic such as how the Church promotes violence. Into this void comes a new argument made most prominently by Taylor Petrey, but also echoed by a student columnist at the University of Utah, and now promoted on Twitter by Benjamin Park—namely, that because there has been some violence done by some Latter-day Saints who use the language of their culture in perpetrating it, Latter-day Saints should watch the series with the intent to learn how to make their Church less violent. Both Petrey and Park had previously criticized the series for its poor job in portraying Latter-day Saints, but have since shifted. We don’t want to attack the Daily Utah Chronicle piece because it’s a student article. But Petrey and Park should know better. Some of us have been on the record defending Petrey as a serious scholar, despite the fact that his conclusions don’t often derive well from the available evidence. But Petrey seems to suggest in his article that any violence that uses the language of religion must have been inspired by that religion. We understand the temptation of this point of view. What else could we blame violence on if not the culture it arose in? But Petrey’s position assumes that human beings are naturally non-violent, and only become violent as a result of their culture. This is a major assumption in the Robert Orsi essay that Petrey relies on extensively. Parks’ tweets similarly assume that any conversation about Latter-day Saints and violence must concede that the faith contributes to the violence in some way. But the causes of violence are often complicated. Because of the importance of our innate nature in creating violence, even the most peaceful society would still produce fringe examples of extreme violence. Having a Latter-day Saint who becomes violent isn’t proof that the faith contributes to that violence, even if the perpetrator uses the language of their culture in perpetuating that violence. Cultural contexts can then increase or decrease the likelihood of that emerging, but no culture has discovered how to remove it altogether. And because Under the Banner of Heaven fails to present a clear picture of what most experience as Latter-day Saint culture, it doesn’t do much to establish whether a Latter-day Saint context is more prone to cause violence than others. Those who use Latter-day Saint or another religious language and context to perpetuate violence weren’t necessarily made violent by those cultures. But rather, violent individuals will leverage anything around them to perpetrate their violence. We’re aware of many other similar examples—of abusers, for instance, who used the language of therapy to perpetuate abuse. But it would be absurd to suggest that therapeutic culture caused that abuse. Even pacifist language has been known to be used to perpetuate violence by shaming survivors into silence. An abusive person will draw upon the most powerful language available within their given cultural context and weaponize that. This is not coincidentally the conclusion made by prosecutors in the Lafferty case, that the murder was about power and relationships and that religion was merely the pretext. Does the Church of Jesus Christ disproportionately create violent offenders? We’d be interested in reading any definitive social science research on the question, but unfortunately, those promoting this point of view or hoping to have this conversation have not yet presented any. And rather than attempt to answer this question clearly itself, Under the Banner of Heaven skips the question and takes it as a given. A study of this sort could start the conversation Petrey, Parks, and the student author hope for. Instead, we get a story about a 38-year-old murder that was notable mainly for how unusual it was among the Latter-day Saint community and perpetrated by someone who had recently been kicked out of the Church for their extremist views. It should not surprise anyone that it hasn’t prompted anyone to conclude there’s a problem with violence among Latter-day Saints.

books

Bites of the Best Books: March 2021

This month, passages about the most potent moral figure in Western culture, the influences on Augustine,
and the enduring wisdom of the prophet Jeremiah.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Stay up to date on the intersection of faith in the public square.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This