1200px-Cornelis_De_Wael_-_To_Visit_the_Imprisoned_-_Google_Art_Project (4)

How to Speak the ‘Whole Language’ of Jesus

Can followers of Christ speak the “whole language” without considering the entirety of the very language of Jesus that makes us whole? A review of Fr. Gregory Boyle’s book, The Whole Language: The Power of Extravagant Tenderness.

The disconnect between our words and deeds usually flows one way: We say one thing but do another. 

Fr. Gregory Boyle’s new book, The Whole Language: The Power of Extravagant Tenderness, reverses this. He is the founder of Homeboy Industries, which claims to be the world’s largest gang rehabilitation and re-entry program. His ministry offers hope and job skills, a sure reflection of the compassionate, merciful, caring core of Jesus. But his words sometimes compromise that compassion by concealing the “whole language” of that same Jesus.

Fr. Boyle introduces us to his many “homies” (associates). Joey is grouchy but is learning, in prison, the transformative power of good works. “When I do things for people … it makes me feel good.” Abel first visits Homeboy Industries because, he says, “I heard they were having pizza”—a reflection of the truth that “we are all connected and born wanting the same things. Yes. Everyone loves pizza.” Saul was sexually abused as a child and killed his abusive stepfather when he was 13. After 23 years of prison, he says he’s “decided to grow up to be somebody I always needed as a child.” Saul’s story tells us that “sometimes our compassion is lost through fear and trauma, but it is always a few breaths away. It can be reawakened.”

These are but three of many such brief accounts throughout this 226-page text. Their grit and texture, along with Fr. Boyle’s informal, breezy, humorous style, make for easy and sometimes compelling reading. He even peppers his pages with brief quotations from some of history’s great thinkers (Rumi, St. Ignatius, and others) to give the book a veneer of intellectual depth.

A being who “chooses to live in the soul, inhabiting the tender fragrance of love…[puts] the welcome mat out so that others find a home in [him].”

Fr. Boyle’s approach shows that a flexible, holistic ministry is our only hope of effecting a change of heart in others—especially in those whose souls have known little but terror-induced languor. He has spent 30 years speaking the “whole language” to help his homies exchange darkness for light. He defines this language as “the fluency of the mystic”—the mystic being one who “chooses to live in the soul, inhabiting the tender fragrance of love,” is at home with himself, and “[puts] the welcome mat out so that others find a home in [him].”

To converse in the whole language, Fr. Boyle says, one must have a sound moral compass. He tells the story of Max, a mentally ill boy sentenced at age 18 for a murder he committed at age 16. Although the punishment is apparently illegal for a crime done by a minor, the judge metes it out anyway because, he tells the boy, “I think you’re a monster.” Fr. Boyle says “society punishes people for bad behavior, and we call it justice, but real justice restores. We’ve mistaken moral outrage for moral compass. Moral compass helps you see with clarity how complex and damaged people are. It is the whole language. Moral outrage just increases the volume and the distance that separates us. I suppose if I thought moral outrage worked, I’d be out raging. But rage just means we don’t understand yet.” 

This is beautifully said—and it’s a sentiment our age of outrage needs to drink in with its morning coffee.

The whole language also requires an expansive approach to truth—an idea that will especially resonate with members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “God holds out wholeness to us,” Fr. Boyle says, so we should embrace it. “In the time of Jesus, some people said, ‘No new gifts—we’re okay with the old ones.’ The mystic is rapturous and ferociously attentive to the new gifts that show up every day.”

Strangely, some of those gifts are the very words of Jesus that Fr. Boyle ignores or contradicts. The book occasionally veers off in unfortunate directions with several stunningly thin theological statements. They are too troubling to ignore. For example, he describes seeing a billboard in Indiana that said, “Jesus: Your Only Way to God.” A Christian familiar with the New Testament should at least see the scriptural merit of this statement. Fr. Boyle goes another way. “Fortunately for all of us,” he writes, “both God and Jesus disagree with this billboard. These are false images we ought not to have before us.” He doesn’t quote this line from the gospel of John, attributed to Jesus: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (NIV).

Perhaps Fr. Boyle is reading a different translation of the New Testament. Is any version of John 14:6 watered down enough to support him? The answer, it turns out, is no. Here is the verse in 62 English translations.

The scripturally literate will also wonder about this line: “Jesus hardly mentions ‘sins,’ and I’m not sure he’d say he died for them.” As you pick up your jaw from the floor, know that Fr. Boyle comes to this conclusion after watching the Quechua indigenous people of Bolivia take stones (representing sin) on Good Friday and place them at the foot of a cross atop a hill. Those carrying bigger stones (symbolizing bigger sins) were admired for their humility. Granted, their focus on size is perverted theology. It is, as Fr. Boyle says, “self-estranging” and shows a false understanding of sin. But to go from there to Jesus didn’t die for sins—well, that’s an illogical leap from the solid stone of scripture into a shark-filled sea of whateverism. The same gospel of John tells us Jesus is “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (NIV, emphasis mine).

Fr. Boyle also wants us to know that God, at least in theory, doesn’t care much about how we live. He says, “the gospel doesn’t know what a sexual ethic is; it only has an ethic of love that longs to include and foster belonging.” He tells us that “God does not test nor burden us. Ever.” He says that “God doesn’t require anything of us except to receive this love that will change everything. … God doesn’t want us to be good. We already are. God only longs for us to be joyful. God has little interest in our behavior, only in our abundant happiness.” He preaches that “God does not hope that we become something other than what we are.” And he recommends getting to a point in life where “the God of requirements has left the room.”

So bid farewell to such classics as the parable of the talents and the story of the 10 virgins. And forget that Jesus ever taught, “If you love me, keep my commands” (NIV).

Doing things, overcoming challenges, becoming better versions of ourselves—that’s what people on Earth do…It’s the essence of our existence.

I wonder: Am I really serving a person who struggles with crippling addiction (as many of Fr. Boyle’s homies do) by telling them they are good just as they are? Not only is this spiritual malpractice—it contradicts several of the stories Fr. Boyle shares in the book. Remember Joey, quoted above, who wrote, “when I do things for people … it makes me feel good.” And then there is Manuel, who chooses to forgive his estranged father who kicked him out of the house as a child (leading to a life of drugs and homelessness, and prison). “You know something,” Manuel tells Fr. Boyle, “in my six months here at Homeboy … I’m enjoying the man I’ve become … like I’ve never enjoyed anything before.” Or take Johnny, a homey with poor mental health and in need of rehab. “If I gave you money,” Fr. Boyle tells him, “that won’t help you. You need rehab. I’ll pay for it” (the emphases are mine throughout).

Doing things, overcoming challenges, becoming better versions of ourselves—that’s what people on Earth do. This is by design. It’s the essence of our existence. 

A decade ago, Elder D. Todd Christofferson said it like this: “Our Heavenly Father is a God of high expectations.” For followers of Christ (Fr. Boyle is a Jesuit priest—a Christian), this means following Christ because it is only through His grace that we progress. The Lutheran pastor and martyr Dietrich Bonhoeffer said it well in his 1937 classic, The Cost of Discipleship: “The road to faith passes through obedience to the call of Jesus. Unless a definite step is demanded, the call vanishes into thin air, and if men imagine they can follow Jesus without taking this step, they are deluding themselves like fanatics.”

I have not read Fr. Boyle’s two other books. But from this one, it’s easy to see why his writing sells. The masses eat up things that are easy, soft, and sweet. In many of the lines quoted above, our Jesuit friend offers us a meal that, like a Twinkie, fills at first with the sugary vapors of delight but over time malnourishes. 

Fr. Boyle isn’t the first (and he won’t be the last) to try to free Christians of what can sometimes feel like theological straitjackets of demanding, discomforting doctrines. The impulse is natural. God is big, His tent wide and welcoming. He is generous with His love. But to say Jesus is Lord can feel narrow in our pluralistic world. It’s true that Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, and many others find closeness to God without believing Jesus to be the Messiah. And agnostics and atheists can and do live moral, joyful lives without religion guiding them. 

Why not put the stronger doctrines through a food processor so they won’t chip the teeth of the unprepared? After all, as Fr. Boyle writes in his introduction, “the world kind of yawns at ‘religion,’ but snaps to attention when offered the authenticity and authority of the fluent mystical, nondualist view.”

Perhaps for some, a softer approach is sometimes a more suitable onramp to faith. But can a follower of Christ speak the “whole language” without considering the entirety of the very language of Jesus that makes us whole?

About the author

Samuel B. Hislop

Samuel B. Hislop is a writer in Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Under the Banner of Heaven Episode 6, “Revelation”

Summary – The detectives show up at the Lafferty home to interrogate Ma Lafferty about the whereabouts of Ron and Dan. She claims they are not there. Pyre takes Brother Brady to the basement to interrogate him about the School of the Prophets meetings there. Brady claims that he experienced a “burning of the bosom” during those meetings and questions why Pyre is so sure those revelations weren’t true. In a flashback, Ron travels to Oregon in search of “true Mormonism” from a man named John Bryant. He discovers Bryant’s commune practicing a “free love” version of polygamy and drinking wine, claiming it’s natural and spiritual and that the Word of Wisdom is an outdated part of the temperance movement. During a communal bath, Bryant explains that he’s received a revelation that he is the One Mighty and Strong and asks to baptize Ron. After he does, Ron is overcome with love and kisses Bryant. Ron returns home to find the School of the Prophets working hard to print pamphlets of warning to the Church based on Prophet Onias’s revelations. They demand that polygamy and the priesthood ban for black members be restored. Onias tells Ron he believes that the six Lafferty brothers are chosen to help him in his work. He takes Ron up the mountain to his Dream Mine, where he believes a great treasure is buried under a capstone. Onias tells Ron that he believes Ron is the One Mighty and Strong and that Diana will come back to him when she sees how blessed he is in this work. Later in the episode, Ron writes a revelation to Diana and reads it to the School of the Prophets. They vote on its authenticity and approve it as true, declaring Ron as the one mighty and strong. Meanwhile, in the present, Taba finds a recently sawed-off shotgun and takes this as evidence that Ron and Dan are nearby. When the detectives confront Ma Lafferty, she calls Taba a dark-skinned Lamanite and claims that the only law she’s subject to is the law of God. When they press her, she blames everything on two men who were with her sons, Chip and Ricky, who had long hair and smelled like skunk. In flashback, Allen comes home to Brenda who is distressed about baby Erica’s fever, but Allen refuses to let her go to a doctor until he can figure out whether his brothers are right about not trusting modern medicine. They get into an argument during which he hits her. Brenda stands up and walks out. A little while later, Brenda’s sister comes to take her to the doctor while Brenda’s dad, Bishop Wright, stays with Allen and grills him about being too extreme in his religious beliefs. Meanwhile, Brenda tells her sister she wants to leave Allen because “this is how it started with Diana,” but her sister pressures her to stay or to let her bishop make the decision for her.  At the Pyre’s home, Pyre visits with Bishop Wright and Brenda as he tries to reassure them. The Wrights wonder if Pyre will be swayed by the “power” of the Lafferty name and question what he’ll do if the case causes trouble for people “above.” Pyre swears loyalty to Brenda alone and says that the Laffertys have no hold on him. Brenda’s sister gives Pyre a pile of her sister’s letters, hoping to piece together the events leading up to the murder. After the Wrights leave, Pyre gives his mother a bath. Grandma Pyre admits that she pinched Pyre’s wife and claims “the devil made me do it.” Pyre uses a “fake” priesthood blessing to calm her and get her to rinse her hair. In flashbacks, Diana and Brenda’s letter got her a meeting with a member of the Seventy. The men offer the solution that “true revelation causes an increase in love and appreciation for the brethren.” Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as a counterargument, saying that Brigham Young commanded it and it couldn’t have been inspired. The seventies try to push the issue aside, but Allen accuses them of inconsistency and storms out. Brenda asks the seventies to approve a divorce, but instead, they give Brenda a blessing, calling her to bring the Laffertys back into the fold. Brenda takes up this cause very literally, buying forbidden store-bought goods for her sisters-in-law and sending missionaries to talk with them. As a result of this meddling, Matilda arrives on Brenda’s doorstep with a warning: “A wife who alienates her husband from her children risks her life.” Because of this threat, Bishop Low and his wife smuggle Diana and her children out of town, though Brenda insists on staying to carry out her calling. Pyre asks Allen about the likelihood that his brothers will leave Diana alone, but this conversation devolves into a discussion of Pyre’s faith crisis. Allen says he “tried to defeat the Church in my mind and see what was left.” He tells Pyre about a red book in his house that tells “a truer story of our people.” Pyre takes Allen’s book home and is reading it in the car and sobbing when his wife discovers him. He admits that he’s struggling, and she asks him to pray with her. He tries but he can’t. She tells him that she refuses to struggle through this with him and demands that he bear his testimony in church to strengthen their children’s faith.   Church History – Allen brings up the Mountain Meadows Massacre as the ultimate example of how revelation is inherently unsafe and unclear. He claims that Brigham Young ordered the massacre. The historical record about whether this is the case is complex, and beyond my scope of expertise. However, I do know that the Church was much more hesitant to comment about the massacre in the 80s, whereas now it has published an essay about the topic as well as supported the publication of a thorough book

What Sex Really Is + Today’s Digest

Our daily rundown of the articles from around the web that we feel our readers would enjoy and appreciate. We hope to highlight the best of what’s around. Public Square Bulletin recommends: What Sex Really Is Aubrey Pollnow—First Things The latest from First Things is remarkable for two reasons. First, it explores implicature and the lengths Amia Srinivasan goes to in her most recent book to avoid being seen talking to the wrong people. Second, it provides a pithy but complete defense of a traditional sexual ethic. Tibet: No Religion Allowed in Social Media Short Videos and Webcasts Lopsang Gurung—Bitter Winter China has set new regulations for social media use in Tibet. Videos shared there cannot mention religion. The rules around this regulation are ambiguous, and enforcement remains to be seen, but this should spark major concerns for any religious freedom advocates. Is “Be True to Yourself” Good Advice? Brian S. Rosner—Crossway Rosner answers the title’s question by basically saying it depends on how you define “yourself.” And then spends the bulk of the article look at the new and sometimes problematic approaches to defining the self that have become socially dominant. The recent prophetic focus on identity from Russell M. Nelson suggests this kind of analysis may be helpful. What is the Church? Chad Nielsen—Times & Seasons An exploration of the remarks most meaningful to the author from general conference, Chad Nielsen examines Reyna Aburto’s talk, tying it into the larger picture of her ministry and earlier remarks. Pro-Abortion Rights Protesters Hit Catholic Churches: Why You Didn’t Read About It Clemente Lisi—Get Religion In the wake of a leaked Supreme Court ruling implication abortion, many have chosen to channel their frustration with hateful and bigoted acts targeted at Catholic churches, including in some cases vandalism and theft. But this story was largely missing from the popular press. The essential religion in media critics at Get Religion have an insightful answer.