A Mother Holding with Her Baby | Losing Yourself in Motherhood, Discovering Who You Are | The Journey of Motherhood & Sacrifices

Losing and Finding Myself in Motherhood

As a young mother, I was a conflicted woman—torn apart by two dreams: “Where did the old me go?” This is how my struggle with children miraculously changed into joy and love unimagined.
The final installment of a series on women in a darkening world, including “Envy, The Wall Between Women,” “In Defense of Men,” “When Motherhood Devours,” and “How Jordan Peterson Made Me a Better Mother

William Adolphe Bouguereau, Mother and Child

Before getting married, I was an adventurous young woman. I had lived overseas much of my life, done 3 research trips to Africa, and taught English in China. I had been awarded several university research grants, published a paper with a professor, and looked forward to a career in environmental development. I was admitted to three prestigious postgraduate programs at Oxford and Cambridge and determined I would attend the University of Cambridge. 

Yet, despite my proclamations that I was in no hurry to get married (akin to a liberated heroine in a Jane Austin novel), deep down, I knew I wanted a family. My childhood had shown me a positive model of family life, and my religious convictions emphasized its importance. So when my knight in shining armor arrived, and the miracle of love fell upon me, I got engaged. 

Miraculously, soon after my engagement, I was selected as a finalist for the Gates Scholarship (Cambridge’s equivalent to the Rhodes Scholarship). I had the chance to have my entire education at Cambridge paid for.  After spending weeks preparing for the interview, I flew to Annapolis and competed for the scholarship with about twenty other applicants. I wasn’t among those chosen for the scholarship. I was heartbroken.

After I had my first child, a beautiful son, I knew this was no low road.

My fiance and I now faced a difficult decision. We knew we would have to take out significant loans in order to pay for my graduate degree.  My fiance, a South African, was just starting his college education.  We were poor and starting a life together. We made what was maybe the most difficult decision of my life—to forgo my graduate degree, and move to Hawaii, where we would work and focus on my husband’s degree.  For us, this was a practical and logical choice.  We wanted to be free of the $100k burden of debt, knowing that even from a prestigious university like Cambridge, it would take years to repay the debt. However, I had also taken the time to really ponder what I wanted out of life.  I felt that God was giving me a choice.  He cares about what we want—and not every choice is a simple choice between good and evil.  These forks in the road require study and prayer. I knew that I had met a wonderful man, and I saw a bright future with him. I wanted a life full of love and children. I thought that getting my degree at Cambridge muddied the waters of that dream. And so I chose what I believe was the better path.  I understood the gravity of the choice.  I knew that the course of my life would change dramatically, but I felt it was worth the sacrifice for what I would gain.

“Choose your sacrifice. Because sacrifice is inevitable. But at least you get to choose it!” ~ Jordan Peterson

When Motherhood is a Sacrifice 

Recently I asked a group of young women in church what hopes and dreams they have for the future. They went around the room and described the colleges they hoped to attend, their dream jobs, and the trips they wanted to take.  They were excited and hopeful about the future, and I encouraged them in their aspirations.  I was surprised, however, that none of these girls mentioned their desire for marriage and family. Perhaps they felt awkward admitting such hopes, which is a shame, but increasingly I find that even religious and socially conservative girls seem to have dropped “being a mom” to the bottom of their list of dreams. Many young women now see the path to womanhood as passing through universities and corporations, not the home.  

In most traditional cultures, there is a “coming-of-age” ceremony, initiation, or ritual associated with passing a boy into manhood. In the past, to be considered a man, young men had to do something difficult to prove themselves. They performed a feat of strength, went on a difficult journey, or fought in battle. These rites of passage are still common in some tribal and religious cultures today (serving missions). In these ways, boys put away “childish things” and take on the duties and responsibilities of manhood. 

For young women, the transition to womanhood has traditionally revolved around their marriage and having their first child. But times have changed, and the passageway to womanhood has become obscured. There are some obvious downsides to using marriage and childbirth as a mark of womanhood.  To name only one, not all women have the opportunity to be mothers. There are many roads to being a fully-developed woman, and those not blessed with motherhood are no less worthy of the title woman.

However, for those women who do become mothersthe transition into motherhood is often difficult, a coming-of-age of sorts.  It is a time of great sacrifice.  Yet this shifting from a young carefree girl to a nurturing mother can ennoble us. As we see the cultural shift away from marriage and mothering, it is vital that we reaffirm to young women, and to ourselves, the rewards and fulfillment that come from the sacrifices of motherhood.  

The Proper Perspective on Sacrifice

It’s okay to admit itmotherhood involves sacrifice. Sacrificethe very word carries with it a feeling of dread. No one wakes up eager for a day full of sacrifice. Some will say, “You must have the wrong perspective if you think motherhood is a sacrifice.”  I say, have you ever been awakened 6 times a night by a crying newborn? If you think that’s not a sacrifice, you are a masochist.  It doesn’t help to deny the sacrifices of motherhood. Rather than attempt to take the sacrifice out of motherhood, downplay it, or minimize it, perhaps we need to develop a new relationship and understanding of the concept. 

Much the same as we read in the New Testament, Dr. Jordan Peterson reminds people, “ultimate sacrifice produces the ultimate reward.” He goes on to describe sacrifice as a bargain we make with the futurelaying down our old life, our old desires, and trusting that something greater will one day rise.  Such a sacrifice of self means stepping into struggle, for change is always difficultbut we are promised that our investment will pay off.  

We sacrifice because we love, and we love because we sacrifice.  Love is the lasting motivatorlove of God, of our spouse, of our children, and our fellow man. Deep inside of us, there is this yearning for belonging and connection. Too often, our modern world has convinced us to point this yearning toward material pursuits or man-made ideologies rather than our families or neighbors. It is important to make sure our sacrifices are for things of most worth.  

“And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.” ~Ephesians 5:2

When we become mothers, we make a choice to sacrifice.  We lay down our carefree youth, and we pick up the duties and responsibilities of having children.  But, as I have found, our sacrifice can yield glorious returns.

The Split of Modern Women

If you see the messages young women are bombarded with by our modern culture, there is no doubt most would say that I chose the lower road. Our culture, rather than championing the duty and sacrifice performed by mothers, often demeans or disregards these sacrifices. 

But after I had my first child, a beautiful son, I knew this was no low road.  The overwhelming love I felt for this child was unlike anything I had ever experienced. But the most difficult sacrificing lay ahead.

Miraculously, the more I sacrificed my own desires for my children’s, the more my desires changed.

There is something about those early days of motherhood—full of noise, duty, and tedium—that wear on many women. When children are non-verbal, and their needs are incessant, we often grow restless.  What’s more, the immediate change in a new mother’s life is so abrupt and drastic that, in our immaturity and inexperience, we may inadvertently fall into “devouring” tendencies. Adopting unbalanced mothering may inhibit us from moving through our coming-of-age trial, keeping us from moving into joyful mothering.

I certainly wasn’t acclimating to motherhood the way I wanted.  Despite a deep, fulfilling love for my children, in my early days of motherhood, I felt like a conflicted womantorn apart by two dreams.   Sometimes as I sat down to pretend-play with my toddler, it was painful, like this wasn’t the REAL me. The REAL me was adventurous and academic … NOT into Dora the Explorer. I remember a feeling of longing descending upon me when changing dirty diapers; I thought, “Where did the old me go?  Has she been lost forever? Are all my travels, studies, and passions gonelost inside this soiled diaper?”  I imagined what might have been and all I might have achieved.  My unfulfilled life, in all its unrealistic glory, plagued me.  I never included duty, rejection, and sacrifice in these fantasies, just a land of self-fulfillment. Then I would snap back into the present and feel guilty for my pridedid I think I was too good to change diapers?  What about all the noble women throughout history who had done their duty and had not whined about it?  

I felt splitsplit between the former me, the independent and selfish child I had been, and the mother I had chosen to be. I was split between the imagined life of influence and fulfilled potential and the real life of picking up toys and disrupted sleep. 

Why The Split?

A quick survey of media, satire, and podcasts shows that motherhood is indeed lame. Where are the portrayals of happy moms living meaningful lives with their families? There’s a reason for the lack of such portrayals. It is easy to list all the hard things about motherhood, for they are easily recognizablepiles of laundry, cooking, cleaning, and disobedient children. But how do you show the love you feel for a newborn baby, the joy you have in your children’s accomplishments, or your bond with your teenage son? Every attempt at such descriptions falls flat. The joys of motherhood are not easily described because they are spiritual and emotional in nature.  Yet these sustaining joys are the fuel for the sacrifices we make and the payback for our efforts.   

But also, we mothers don’t want to brag. With all the posturing and fakeness of social media, we want to be genuine about the true nature of life, and we don’t want other women to feel inadequate in comparison.  So we often hold back on sharing our joy, our fulfillment, or our pride in our children.  But unfortunately, we often fill that silence with something worse, something that does not give accurate expression to our experiences and can transform that experience itself. We complain about motherhood; we overemphasize the bad and minimize the good.  We share the struggles, not the successes. So the next generation continues to ask. “Why would I ever want that? It doesn’t look very fun.”

The Meaning of Motherhood

Thankfully, my upbringing, faith, and wisdom from others aided me as I transitioned my mind to motherhood. Instead of going the route I had seen some women go and decide that I was going against my true nature and quit (either by disengaging or making excuses for their deficiencies), I decided that this is what sacrifice felt like; it had to be difficultthat was part of the process.  And thus, my attitude changed.

We all have crosses to carry.   In the early years of motherhood, my cross was my longing for the “missed” opportunity of going to Cambridge. It was indeed a loss.  But I had allowed myself to get lost in the fantasy of an unfulfilled dream.  I needed to let go of the past so I could fully embrace the present and become a woman capable of finding joy in her chosen path. I had a dutya duty I had chosen. And one I loved deeplymy children.  

“To love is to suffer, and there can be no love otherwise.” ~Fyodor Dostoevsky, Notes from Underground

A Life of Influence

G.K. Chesterton, a 20th-century British social commentator, questions the modern denigration of the influence of the typical homemaker, or “Mrs. Jones,”  “How can it be a large career to tell other people’s children about the Rule of Three [a writing principle], and a small career to tell one’s own children about the universe? How can it be broad to be the same thing to everyone and narrow to be everything to someone? No. A mother’s function is laborious but because it is gigantic, not because it is minute. I will pity Mrs. Jones for the hugeness of her task; I will never pity her for its smallness.” 

Many young women dream of the glories of a future career, but reality is likely to be bleaker than their imaginings. In an interview, Jordan Peterson rightly points out that very few people will ever have a truly meaningful career.  Most people end up with jobsones they dread, ones they don’t find particularly meaningful.  “It’s a lie, as far as I am concerned, because what most people realize as they get olderis that what people find most satisfying about life is … well … love.  A good marriage, kids …”

Money is a necessity of life, and not all women can be full-time moms.  That is okay.  But let’s not tell young women the lie that a job will fill their “meaning void.”

“God sent you here not to be successful, but faithful.” ~Mother Teresa

Eventually, women figure out that the modern emphasis on careers before relationships is backward. They wonder if they made the wrong sacrifice for the wrong rewards.  Statistics show women in their 30s are fleeing demanding professional careers to try and beat their fertility deadline. 

A mother’s investment of time and energy in their young children pays off.  Their love and influence will live in their children’s minds and spirits forever.  Jordan Peterson says, “Your main job as a parent is to socialize your child in the first four years of life.” Those early years are critical in building resiliency, emotional attachment, teaching values, and guiding their perceptions.  

“All that I am, or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.”  ~Abraham Lincoln

A parenting truism is that the days are long, but the years are short. The foundation of our children’s character is laid in those long days, but the years of training fly by. As Dr. Peterson says in a podcast, “Kids are unbelievably good company; they pay you back for your care of them. You have little kids for four years, and if you miss it, it’s done! And that’s that. That period between 0-5 is a peak experience in life, and it isn’t much of your life, and if you miss itit’s gone! You miss it at your peril, and you don’t get it back.”  So yes, it is a strugglebut it’s worth it. 

Accepting The Struggle

For the many young mothers who may struggle with their coming of age into motherhood, there is no shame in finding the transition difficult. Being a Mother is not simply a choice; it is someone we must become through a process of sacrifice and maturation. It often requires discipline and willpower before we find enjoyment.  I determined to sit on the floor and teach my stubborn 5-year-old to read, not because I enjoyed it, but because I wanted my child to read.  I played dress-up with my daughter not because I wanted to but because I knew I was building a bond by joining my daughter in her imaginative play.  And, miraculously, the more I sacrificed my own desires for my children’s, the more my desires changed.  As I saw my son start to read sentences, I enthusiastically bought more books. I saw that I was capable of opening a world of knowledge to him.  As I discovered that my daughter possessed a creative mind, I gloried in hearing her stories, in expanding my own imagination. I started enjoying motherhood. 

I remember how my chunky 13-month-old boy could not seem to learn how to stand up.  We tried everythinghe just wasn’t motivated.  Finally, we discovered the answerI held out a graham cracker and waved it up above my son’s head.  He would reach as high as he could on his bum, then with it just out of reach, he would get on his feet and grab it.

The sacrifice of motherhood is found in the dying of an immature and self-interested self to a more balanced and loving Woman.

I think I was just like my little boy.  I only really became a mother when I stopped looking everywhere else and realized there was a graham cracker hovering over my head.  I focused on what motivated me—my love for my kids, my hope for a happy family, and my trust that my sacrifice mattered. Our first feeble steps as mothers are halting like our toddlers, but we grow steadier when we have a firm purpose.

The sacrifice of motherhood is found in the dying of an immature and self-interested self to a more balanced and loving Woman.  This is not a sacrifice of our God-given passions and interests. Becoming a mother means we get to share ourselves with our children; we get to use our knowledge, experiences, and personality to raise up a capable child.  Choosing motherhood will result in a shifting of priorities and a delaying or adapting of certain goals, but no righteous desire need be left unfulfilled. We will be the primary influencer of our children, and we can also have a great influence on our community and the world at large.  My mother returned to graduate school after I, her youngest, started Kindergarten. I remember her sharing much of her growing knowledge of psychology with us children.  I am sure she practiced her therapy on usshe also aided hundreds of struggling patients.  Thankfully life is long; we must be patient with our virtuous dreams. The time will come if we put first things first.  (This piece outlines how women of diverse personalities and interests can rear children using their unique traits.)  

The Reward for the Sacrifice

At the risk of sounding proud, I like what motherhood has made me. Countless hours of thankless labor have taught me to be more humble and more sensitive to others’ emotions and needs.  The diverse demands of nurturing, teaching, and providing for children have helped deepen my knowledge, character, and my capabilities. The old me saw a screaming kid at the park and thought, “What a brat.” Now, I go up and smile at the child and try to calm him. The old me felt degraded by the endless cooking and cleaning. Now, I see nobility in hard work. Rearing my children well has been, for me, the ultimate responsibility and so has brought immense meaning into my life.

Now, five kids in, I do not feel like my “true self” was lost inside a soiled diaper. I no longer feel split between love and influenceI have found them both because I sacrificed for motherhood.  

 

A few more resources:

This previously published piece emphasizes that sometimes our flawed perception of a “good mother” may make the transition to motherhood more difficult.  Devouring tendencies may inhibit us from moving through our coming-of-age trial, keeping us from finding joy in motherhood.

About the author

Allyson Flake Matsoso

Allyson Flake Matsoso has a degree in Environmental/African Studies and has published research in Social Work. She runs the celebrated "Philosophy of Motherhood" blog.
On Key

You Might Also Like

The Room Next Door Review

“The Room Next Door” is the latest example of arthouse social engineering.  The film is about a troubled woman, Martha, who in the midst of cancer treatments decides to commit suicide. If this bothers you, the film implies, it is because there is something wrong with you. This is all the more troubling, because the film, in many ways, is beautiful. It is directed by Pedro Almodóvar, one of the most acclaimed living film directors, in his first full-length film in English. And you can’t help but be taken by the beauty of it all. The film is suffused with the soft colors of the woods. Despite being an entire screenplay full of little except two friends talking, the camera work keeps the film alive and moving. And Julianne Moore and Tilda Swinton who play Ingrid and Martha once again give impeccable, engaging performances, that you can’t help but admire.  But all the beauty in this film is in service of a story that is decidedly ugly—but not self-awarely so. Our two main characters are old friends who met as young writers. Ingrid has published a best seller recently, where she writes about how she can’t accept death. On her publicity tour, she learns that Martha is in the hospital with cancer. She goes to visit her and reignite their friendship. We learn through the conversations that these characters aren’t bad people, necessarily, they just struggle to see a world outside of their own desires and consciousness. They have repeatedly avoided building relationships or having families. Martha does have a daughter. But she chased her father away, then lied to her about who he was her whole life, and then proceeded to be an absent mother so she could chase the romanticism of being a war correspondent.  Now that she is sick and dying, she notices that she has no one in her life. The movie comments on this like an unusual quirk, rather than the inevitable result of a life of bad decisions. We learn early on that cancer treatment can be a roller coaster with euphoric peaks, and miserable nadirs. During one such rut, Martha purchases a suicide pill, and decides she will kill herself. She reaches out to Ingrid and asks her to come on vacation with her, so that she will have someone in the house when she does it.  Ingrid agrees. And although she early on expresses some discomfort, she quickly respects Martha’s wishes to largely pretend nothing is happening. They have a lovely vacation in upstate New York watching old movies and reading books. While they are there, Ingrid reconnects with Damien (John Turturo) an ex-boyfriend of both hers and Martha’s. He is horrified at the state of the world, and seems to only live for sex (or to constantly talk about sex.) Damien is not a sympathetic character, and perhaps the audience is supposed to read that his unpleasant and helpless politics are akin to Martha’s helpless approach to life. If so the audience hardly has time to ponder it under a heavy heaping of affirmations about the power to choose, and the dignity to die.  Eventually, Martha does exactly what she promised to do. There is a brief police investigation where the officer (Alessandro Nivola) expresses concern that Ingrid would have knowingly not gotten help for her friend. A lawyer comes and helpfully tells the audience we can ignore that concern because he is a religious fanatic. This is the kind of movie that alludes to James Joyce not just once but three times. It is so pleased with just how artsy it is. And for a film with a message like “life isn’t worth fighting for,” the best comfort is that it’s so artsy not a lot of people will watch it.  The only people I would recommend watching this film is for those studying how society has devalued human life, and how good tools can be misused to harm people. The film is rated PG-13. It includes several normalized same-sex relationships, and some joking about polyamorous relationships. But obviously the biggest warning is the way it normalizes and glamorizes suicide. If you watch it with older teenagers, I would focus on questions about the choice that Martha made, and how family and relationships could have helped her make better choices. I might ask about how Ingrid could have been a better or more caring friend. One out of five stars. “The Room Next Door” will be released in theaters nationwide January 17, 2025.

Is it Time for Latter-day Saints to Support Same-Sex Marriage?

I wanted to thank Blair Hodges for calling attention to an article we ran earlier this year by Professor Robert P. George.  Blair has been a frequent critic of the magazine, and we appreciate his engagement and efforts in drawing attention to the work we’re doing. As one of the pre-eminent political philosophers working today, Professor George’s decision to publish with us was a major sign of legitimacy.  Hodge’s article was, in many ways, perceptive. He noticed that Professor George, and by extension, many of our editors here, is concerned that many people, especially religious people, struggle to justify their beliefs about family, marriage, and sexuality through anything other than appeals to religious authority. (We kindly disagree that these positions are anti-LGBT+ as Blair describes them.) And he’s right about that motivation. Church leaders have been very clear about the doctrine of the family for more than a generation, as we highlighted earlier this year. But where the cultural messaging on sexuality is so dominant, it’s easy for Latter-day Saints to feel overwhelmed and struggle to explain to others why they accept what prophet leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ teach what they do.   And Hodges is right that we hope to make a difference in this regard with our work. But otherwise, his article falls into the same traps of many before him that George and others have largely dealt with. Conflating “Hyper-Individualism” with “Expressive-Individualism” Hodges attempts to address George’s concern with individualism. But he makes a category error. Individualism, as Hodges uses it, seems to be a synonym for selfish. Individualism, as George uses it, means how we define the individual. These are two substantially different concepts. On this basis, Hodges raises concerns about hyper-individualism (hyper-selfish)—pointing out this issue is no more relevant to LGBT+ issues than to anyone else. That’s a fine argument to make, but it really has nothing to do with the point George makes. His point being, how we define the individual is of crucial importance to issues of sexuality. Because today the predominant cultural approach to defining the self is expressive individualism. Expressive individualism is a philosophy that holds that who we are is defined by what we feel we are at our psychological core. And that the greatest good is expressing that psychological core to the world, including through our behavior.  As described by Carl Trueman in his recent book The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self, this idea has its roots in the work of Romantic philosophers like Jean-Jaques Rousseau and like-minded poets, literary figures, and artists of the 18th and 19th centuries, but largely took off in the 1960s at the beginning of the sexual revolution. Expressive individualism has substantially become our culture’s default approach to defining identity. But many Christians push back on this idea as we choose to make our central identities based on a different foundation.  As articulated by President Nelson in a recent devotional for young adults, he explained that the three identities we should prioritize (and not allow to be obscured) are 1) Child of God 2) Child of the Covenant 3) Disciple of Christ As Latter-day Saints, then, we choose to make those our central identities and base our choices on that foundation.  Hodges also suspects that “queerness would be less ‘central’ to a person’s identity the less social pressure and regulation they’d face about it.”  But what does Hodges mean by less central? If identity powerfully influences the choices we make, then the less central an identity, the less influence it has over our choices. These choices include why, how, when, and with whom someone has sexual relations. Prioritizing disciple of Christ and child of the covenant as identities, as Russell M. Nelson suggests, would lead to different choices about sex than prioritizing sexuality as identity. Love and Disagreement One of Hodges’ main requests is that George “spent more time saying how a person can be loving towards someone while also condemning an important part of their identity.” In our view, this is a tired argument in an already wearisome conversation. Sexuality is not an inevitably central part of identity.  Our editorial team falls across the political spectrum. In each of our lives, we have people who love us despite having serious concerns with that political part of our identity.  Our editorial team are all Latter-day Saints. In each of our lives, we have people who love us despite harboring serious questions about the important religious part of our identity. We’ve also felt loved by people who thought it was a dangerous and outdated idea not to have sex until marriage, constituting an important part of all our sexual identities. But Hodges’ argument suggests it’s somehow impossible to love someone while having honest concerns about how they prioritize the sexual part of their identity.  But of course, it’s not. Not only is it possible, but Christian believers are under clear command to love those we disagree with.  It’s those who demand “you can’t love me unless you agree with my paradigm for identity” that are preaching an extreme and radically alternative  approach to tolerance in a pluralistic society, not those who say, “I love you, but I disagree.” That has been the durable default of pluralistic tolerance that has helped make our diverse nation possible. Race and Sexuality Blair also goes to the old tired well of comparing race and sexuality. This is a comparison that many civil rights activists have rejected.  Dr. Alveda King, Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece, and William Avon Keen, president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Virginia, the organization Martin Luther King Jr. started, have rejected the connection between sexuality and race in civil rights.  In fact, George takes on Blair’s point at length in his article in Harvard’s Journal of Law and Public Policy: Revisionists today miss this central question—what is marriage? when they equate traditional marriage laws with laws banning interracial marriage. … But the analogy fails: antimiscegenation was about whom to