
Forgetting the Connection Between Law and Morality
As society becomes more secular, we’re relying on the legal system to replace personal ethical systems. But how effectively can the law actually do that?

As society becomes more secular, we’re relying on the legal system to replace personal ethical systems. But how effectively can the law actually do that?

When we look at Latter-day Saint rhetoric through the traditional heaven/hell lens it may seem overly harsh. The actual doctrine is much more welcoming.

There is great wisdom in receiving counsel and safety in seeking advisement. When a family, a community, or a nation loses this capacity, its effects ripple out in all directions.

Since my mother-in-law died ten days prior to a day many Christians call Good Friday, I have wondered what about the crucifixion of the Messiah is “good.”

The Washington Post wisely warned against worsening public dialogue. But to get there they made a weak connection to Brigham Young that missed the historical mark.

The word “tolerance” has two completely different meanings — and that’s why it’s imperative that when we say it, we clarify our intent.

The central focus today on consent is not enough. Without seeing individuals as something more than an object of sexual gratification, people will continue to be hurt and misused.

Our public square is hurting. Let’s do something about it.



